Slovenia - PrvaLigaStadion StožiceData current as of 13 September 2026

Bravo vs Celje: match statistics

Bravo crest
Bravo
2 : 1half-time 0:1
Celje crest
Celje

Bravo vs Celje: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Bravo played Celje in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: Stadion Stožice. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Bravo: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Celje: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Bravo scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Celje scores 1.43 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.54 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Bravo 38%, Celje 57%. Over 2.5: Bravo 38%, Celje 43%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Celje has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.57. Bravo: 13.6 shots per match, Celje: 13.7.

Match halves

Bravo: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50. Celje: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Bravo: 16-30 (3 goals). Celje: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

PrvaLiga: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-1. Average goals 2.75, BTTS 25%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Celje have the clearer edge in away fixtures: they average 2 goals per match, while Bravo score just 1 at home. The visitors also create more high-quality chances, as reflected by an xG of 1.86 compared with 1.67, 5.33 shots on target per match, and a conversion rate of 14% versus the hosts’ 8%. Bravo concede an average of 1.33 goals at home, while their defence allows opponents an xG of 1.86, suggesting that Celje’s attack should have room to find the net. Neither side’s recent form is particularly convincing, but Celje have won 2 of their 3 away matches and have scored in every one of them. Home advantage and Bravo’s three draws in their last five matches keep the possibility of a share of the points significant, but the overall evidence points more strongly towards the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Celje have a season BTTS rate of 67%, higher than Bravo’s 50% and the league-wide figure of 49%, while they are yet to record a match without scoring. The visitors average 2.0 goals per game, generate 1.86 xG and register 5.33 shots on target, whereas Bravo keep a clean sheet in only 25% of matches. Bravo score an average of 1.0 goal, but Celje’s defence concedes as many as 1.67 goals per game, giving the home side a realistic route to finding the net. Recent form has been less attacking, with Bravo scoring 0.8 goals and Celje 1.0 over their previous five matches, so the BTTS - Yes scenario remains only moderately supported. The higher quality of both teams’ chance creation, reflected in season xG figures of 1.56 for Bravo and 1.86 for Celje, provides slight support for BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Celje average 2.0 goals away from home, but in their last five matches they have managed only 1.0 goal per game, while Bravo record 1.0 and 0.8 goals respectively. The hosts have seen fewer than 3.5 goals in 75% of their matches this season, and their last five outings produced just 1.6 total goals per game. Celje’s attack remains the main argument against a very low-scoring game, as they create an average of 1.86 xG and record 5.33 shots on target per match, while Bravo concede only 1.0 goal on average. The projected total of 2.51 goals points to a realistic chance of three goals, but the four-goal threshold is clearly less likely; therefore, the best option is Under 3.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Celje holds a clear edge in the seasonal data: they have won 67% of their matches, scored an average of 2.0 goals and recorded an xG of 1.86, compared with Bravo’s 1.0 goals and 1.56 xG. The visitors tend to start matches well, having never been behind at half-time, while 67% of their games were level at the break; Bravo, by contrast, were trailing at half-time in as many as 75% of their home matches. The strongest scenario remains a draw at half-time followed by a Celje win (X/2), as Bravo have kept a clean sheet before the break in 80% of their last five matches, increasing the likelihood of a cautious opening. After the interval, however, Celje’s superior quality should prove decisive: they average 5.33 shots on target per match compared with Bravo’s 3.0 and have a finishing efficiency of 14%, versus 8% for the hosts.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

42Possession (%)58
BravoCelje
6Shots8
BravoCelje
4Shots on target1
BravoCelje
1.16xG1.1
BravoCelje
2Corners6
BravoCelje
68Dangerous attacks71
BravoCelje
-1Fouls-1
BravoCelje
2Cards1
BravoCelje

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match1.43
BravoCelje
1Goals conceded / match1.29
BravoCelje
41%Average possession62%
BravoCelje
4.5Shots on target / match4.14
BravoCelje

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.63Shots per match13.71
BravoCelje
4.5Shots on target4.14
BravoCelje
7.3%Shot conversion10.4%
BravoCelje
41%Possession62%
BravoCelje
1.57xG for1.71
BravoCelje
1.86xG against1.35
BravoCelje

Shooting quality

Bravo: BalancedCelje: Balanced
BravoCelje
Accuracy (shots on target)33%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Celje is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Bravo · 1.8 pts / match - Celje

Bravo
DDLWD
Season result split
38% W38% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-2
1.50 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 at home
1-1-1
LDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Celje
WWLWL
Season result split
43% W29% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-2
1.57 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 away
2-0-1
WLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Celje is 43% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Bravo · 1.43 goals / match - Celje

Bravo is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Bravo · 1.29 goals / match - Celje

Bravo scoring profile: strong

Bravo scores in 63% of matches (5 of 8 matches), while Celje keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).

Celje scoring profile: strong

Celje scores in 86% of matches (6 of 7 matches), while Bravo keeps a clean sheet in 50% (4 of 8 matches).

8Goals scored (season)10
BravoCelje
8Goals conceded (season)9
BravoCelje
2Average goals in match2.71
BravoCelje
4Goals scored (last 5)7
BravoCelje
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
BravoCelje

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal86%
BravoCelje
38%2 goals43%
BravoCelje
0%3 goals14%
BravoCelje
0%4 goals0%
BravoCelje

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal71%
BravoCelje
25%2 goals29%
BravoCelje
25%3 goals14%
BravoCelje
0%4 goals14%
BravoCelje

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time29%
BravoCelje
0%BTTS in both halves0%
BravoCelje
38%Scored in both halves14%
BravoCelje

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
BravoCelje
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
BravoCelje
40%BTTS - last 540%
BravoCelje

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
BravoCelje
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
BravoCelje
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
BravoCelje

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
BravoCelje
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
BravoCelje
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
BravoCelje

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Bravo is 103% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.75 pts / match - Bravo · 0.86 pts / match - Celje

Bravo - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing
Celje - half-time state
14% leading43% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.75Points per match (1st half)0.86
BravoCelje
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.43
BravoCelje
0.25Goals conceded (1st half)0.71
BravoCelje
0.75Average goals (1st half)1.14
BravoCelje
75%Clean sheet before half-time29%
BravoCelje
50%No goal before half-time71%
BravoCelje

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)2.29
BravoCelje
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)1
BravoCelje
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
BravoCelje
1.25Average goals (2nd half)1.57
BravoCelje
63%Clean sheet after half-time71%
BravoCelje
50%No goal after half-time29%
BravoCelje

Bravo - second-half results

38% W38% D25% L
14
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding76%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 38%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Celje - second-half results

71% W14% D14% L
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding307%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Bravo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Celje - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.00
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Bravo
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
3
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
3
0
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Celje
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
2
2
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
3
46-60
2
0
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.36
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+17%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Bravo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.57
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.86
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Celje

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).

Teams vs league

BravoLigaCelje
Average goals in match 2.002.54 2.71
Both teams scored 38%51% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%44% 43%
Clean sheets 50%29% 29%
Goal before half-time 75%68% 71%
Goal after half-time 75%80% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.54
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.27
Home goals / match
1.27
Away goals / match
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defence advantage
+-7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. BravoYellow cardArinze James Inyere
  2. CeljeSubstitutionOn: Svit SešlarOff: Mario Kvesić
  3. CeljeSubstitutionOn: Yaya DukulyOff: Benjamin Verbič
  4. CeljeYellow cardPijus Sirvys
  5. BravoYellow cardAldin Jakupović
  6. CeljeSubstitutionOn: Veton TushaOff: Matic Ivanšek
  7. BravoSubstitutionOn: Olanrewaju Ojo MoladeOff: Marwann Nzuzi
  8. BravoGoalAndrej Pecar
  9. BravoGoalJon Ficko

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Bravo 2 - 1 - 1 Celje. Average goals 2.75, both teams scored in 25% matches.

NK Celje
2 : 3
AŠK Bravo Publikum
AŠK Bravo Publikum
1 : 0
NK Celje
NK Celje
0 : 0
AŠK Bravo Publikum
AŠK Bravo Publikum
0 : 5
NK Celje

FAQ

What was the result of Bravo vs Celje?

The PrvaLiga match finished Bravo 2:1 Celje. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Bravo and Celje?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Bravo won 2, Celje won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Bravo vs Celje?

Bravo score 1.00 goals per game on average and Celje 1.43. The PrvaLiga average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Bravo's matches and 57% of Celje's.

What form are Bravo and Celje in?

Over the last 5 games Bravo have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Celje 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bravo vs Celje?

The statistical background for Bravo vs Celje — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.