Slovenia - PrvaLigaStadion StožiceData current as of 03 September 2026

Bravo vs Mura: match statistics

Bravo crest
Bravo
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Mura crest
Mura

Bravo vs Mura: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Bravo played Mura in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The match was played on 29 August 2026. Venue: Stadion Stožice. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Bravo: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Mura: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Bravo scores 1.00 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Mura scores 1.33 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.43 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Bravo 50%, Mura 67%. Over 2.5: Bravo 50%, Mura 67%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 40%.

xG, shots and style

Bravo has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.55. Bravo: 14.3 shots per match, Mura: 12.7.

Match halves

Bravo: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50. Mura: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Bravo: 16-30 (2 goals). Mura: 16-30 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

PrvaLiga: 2.43 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 40%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-1. Average goals 2.25, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Mura have a clear offensive edge away from home: they average 2.0 goals per match, while Bravo average just 0.5 at home. The visitors also record an average of 7 shots on target per game compared with 3 for the hosts, and they have yet to finish an away match without scoring; Bravo have failed to score in 50% of their home fixtures. However, Mura’s defence remains vulnerable, conceding 2.67 goals per away match and keeping no clean sheets, which boosts the hosts’ chances of finding the net. Bravo have also failed to keep a clean sheet at home, while their average xG against stands at 1.82, so the visitors’ more effective attack should prevail in a match where both teams are likely to score. Mura also have a slightly better recent points record, averaging 1.2 points per game over their last five rounds compared with Bravo’s 1.0.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - Yes pick is primarily supported by Mura’s very weak defence, having yet to keep a clean sheet, conceding an average of 2.67 goals and allowing opponents an xG of 1.38. Bravo have scored just 0.67 goals per match this season, but their recent attacking form has improved to 1.0 goal per game, while BTTS landed in 80% of their last five matches. Mura are clearly more dangerous in attack, averaging 2.0 goals, 1.86 xG and 7 shots on target per match, whereas Bravo conceded 1.6 goals in their last five matches, with an opposition xG of 1.94. The visitors have seen BTTS in 100% of their matches this season and 60% of their last five, while both teams conceded an average of 1.6 and 2.0 goals per match, respectively, across those recent runs. Despite Bravo’s weaker season-long scoring record, the combination of the hosts’ attacking strength and Mura’s lack of clean sheets makes a Goal/Goal scenario more likely than No Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Mura demonstrate clear attacking potential: they average 2.00 goals, create chances worth 1.86 xG, and register 7.0 shots on target per match. Bravo’s defense allows opponents 1.37 xG, while they have conceded an average of 1.60 goals in their last five matches, supporting the likelihood of at least one away goal. The hosts score just 0.67 goals per match, but their average of 1.24 xG, along with 1.27 xG across their last five appearances, indicates a realistic chance of adding a goal of their own against a Mura side conceding an average of 2.67 goals. Over 1.5 goals has landed in all of Mura’s matches and in 60% of the last five meetings involving both teams, while the projected total of 2.78 goals provides a clear margin of safety for this line. The strongest selection is Over 1.5 goals, as even with Bravo’s lower attacking efficiency, Mura’s offensive profile and the defensive vulnerabilities of both sides significantly reduce the likelihood of a match finishing with no more than one goal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Mura have the stronger attacking profile, scoring an average of 2.00 goals per match with an xG of 1.86, while Bravo score just 0.67 goals and generate xG of 1.24. The visitors led at the break in 2 of their 3 matches so far, equivalent to 67% of games, while Bravo have scored before half-time just 0.33 times on average. Mura’s superiority is not beyond doubt, however, as they concede an average of 2.67 goals per match, while over their last five appearances the two teams have conceded 2.00 and 1.60 goals respectively. The 2/2 outcome therefore remains the most likely: Mura should capitalise on their superior chance creation in the first half, and their attack gives them the best chance of preserving the lead until full-time despite the risk of conceding.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
BravoMura
9Shots17
BravoMura
5Shots on target4
BravoMura
1.27xG1.93
BravoMura
4Corners6
BravoMura
48Dangerous attacks80
BravoMura
15Fouls18
BravoMura
4Cards2
BravoMura

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match1.33
BravoMura
1.33Goals conceded / match2
BravoMura
41%Average possession45%
BravoMura
4.33Shots on target / match5
BravoMura

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.33Shots per match12.67
BravoMura
4.33Shots on target5
BravoMura
7%Shot conversion10.5%
BravoMura
41%Possession45%
BravoMura
1.63xG for1.55
BravoMura
2xG against1.37
BravoMura

Shooting quality

Bravo: AttackingMura: Balanced
BravoMura
Accuracy (shots on target)30%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mura is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Bravo · 1.2 pts / match - Mura

Bravo
LWDDL
Season result split
33% W33% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-2
1.33 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 at home
0-1-1
LD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.91BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Mura
WLLWL
Season result split
33% W17% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-3
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 away
1-1-1
DLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mura is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Bravo · 1.33 goals / match - Mura

Bravo is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.33 goals / match - Bravo · 2 goals / match - Mura

Bravo scoring profile: very strong

Bravo scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Mura keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

Mura scoring profile: very strong

Mura scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Bravo keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).

6Goals scored (season)8
BravoMura
8Goals conceded (season)12
BravoMura
2.33Average goals in match3.33
BravoMura
4Goals scored (last 5)6
BravoMura
8Goals conceded (last 5)10
BravoMura

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal83%
BravoMura
33%2 goals50%
BravoMura
0%3 goals0%
BravoMura
0%4 goals0%
BravoMura

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal83%
BravoMura
33%2 goals50%
BravoMura
33%3 goals33%
BravoMura
0%4 goals17%
BravoMura

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time17%
BravoMura
0%BTTS in both halves17%
BravoMura
33%Scored in both halves50%
BravoMura

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
BravoMura
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
BravoMura
60%BTTS - last 560%
BravoMura

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
BravoMura
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
BravoMura
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
BravoMura

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
BravoMura
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
BravoMura
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
BravoMura

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Bravo - half-time state
50% leading17% draw33% trailing
Mura - half-time state
50% leading17% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per match (1st half)1.67
BravoMura
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.67
BravoMura
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
BravoMura
0.83Average goals (1st half)1.17
BravoMura
67%Clean sheet before half-time67%
BravoMura
50%No goal before half-time33%
BravoMura

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)0.33
BravoMura
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
BravoMura
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.5
BravoMura
1.5Average goals (2nd half)2.17
BravoMura
50%Clean sheet after half-time17%
BravoMura
50%No goal after half-time33%
BravoMura

Bravo - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
10
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding66%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mura - second-half results

0% W33% R67% P
10
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding66%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Bravo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Mura - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.40
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.61.4
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Bravo
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Mura
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
1
4
46-60
2
0
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
116%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Bravo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.63
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.67
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Mura

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.85
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.63
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
171%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).

Teams vs league

BravoLigaMura
Average goals in match 2.332.43 3.33
Both teams scored 50%50% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%40% 67%
Clean sheets 33%30% 17%
Goal before half-time 83%73% 83%
Goal after half-time 83%83% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.43
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.17
Home goals / match
1.27
Away goals / match
+-8%
Home attack advantage
+-9%
Home defence advantage
+-7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
17%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. BravoGoalMarwann Nzuzi
  2. MuraSubstitutionOn: Žiga FermišekOff: Adnan Golubović
  3. MuraSubstitutionOn: Kristjan TrdinOff: Lovro Kitin
  4. MuraYellow cardFlorjan Jevšenak
  5. BravoYellow cardAldin Jakupović
  6. MuraSubstitutionOn: Šimun ButićOff: Niko Kasalo
  7. BravoGoalRok Kopatin
  8. MuraYellow cardFaad Sana
  9. BravoYellow cardSandi Nuhanović
  10. BravoYellow cardMatjaž Rožman
  11. BravoYellow cardJakob Brunnhofer

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Bravo 2 - 1 - 1 Mura. Average goals 2.25, both teams scored in 50% matches.

NŠ Mura
1 : 2
AŠK Bravo Publikum
AŠK Bravo Publikum
0 : 2
NŠ Mura
NŠ Mura
1 : 1
AŠK Bravo Publikum
AŠK Bravo Publikum
2 : 0
NŠ Mura

FAQ

What was the result of Bravo vs Mura?

The PrvaLiga match finished Bravo 2:0 Mura. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Bravo and Mura?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Bravo won 2, Mura won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Bravo vs Mura?

Bravo score 1.00 goals per game on average and Mura 1.33. The PrvaLiga average is 2.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Bravo's matches and 67% of Mura's.

What form are Bravo and Mura in?

Over the last 5 games Bravo have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Mura 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bravo vs Mura?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.