El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 23 July 2026

Cacahuatique vs CD Platense: match statistics

Cacahuatique crest
Cacahuatique
1 : 1half-time 0:0
CD Platense crest
CD Platense

Cacahuatique vs CD Platense: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cacahuatique play CD Platense in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match date is 5 April 2026 at 23:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Cacahuatique: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. CD Platense: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cacahuatique scores 1.18 and concedes 1.37 goals per match. CD Platense scores 1.22 and concedes 1.43. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cacahuatique 57%, CD Platense 57%. Over 2.5: Cacahuatique 55%, CD Platense 41%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Cacahuatique has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.24. Cacahuatique: 8.9 shots per match, CD Platense: 8.5.

Match halves

Cacahuatique: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.55. CD Platense: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.70.

Goals by minute

Cacahuatique: 16-30 (12 goals). CD Platense: 31-45+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 1-1-1. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 67%.

Match description

Cacahuatique has the advantage in chance creation: home xG averages 1.53 versus 1.12 xG for Platense away, and the hosts average 9.68 shots per match with 4 on target, while Platense records 7.32 shots and 3.63 on target. In the last 5 matches Cacahuatique scored 7 and conceded only 3, averaging 1.4 points per game, whereas Platense scored 6 and conceded 8, averaging 1.0 point per game, indicating better defensive form for the hosts. Nevertheless, Platense has a higher shot conversion rate of 17% versus 11% for the hosts, and the away goals average for the visitors is 1.26 versus 1.05 for the hosts at home, so the visitors can still make use of their chances. The hosts are less likely to be shut out at home (clean-sheet-less rate 35% vs 42% for Platense away) and maintain higher possession (53% vs 46%), which favors game control. Considering the higher xG, greater shot volume and better defensive metrics over the last 5 matches, I forecast a Cacahuatique win; I assess probabilities at approximately 55% for the hosts, 25% for a draw and 20% for Platense.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
11Shots11
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
6Shots on target3
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
1.48xG1.15
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
2Corners3
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
50Dangerous attacks34
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
-1Fouls-1
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
-1Cards-1
CacahuatiqueCD Platense

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CacahuatiqueCD Platense
1.18Goals scored / match1.22
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
1.37Goals conceded / match1.43
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
47%Average possession48%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
4.27Shots on target / match3.72
CacahuatiqueCD Platense

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.88Shots per match8.48
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
4.27Shots on target3.72
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
13.3%Shot conversion14.4%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
47%Possession48%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
1.4xG for1.24
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
1.57xG against1.33
CacahuatiqueCD Platense

Shooting quality

Cacahuatique: Counter-attackingCD Platense: Efficient finishing
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
Accuracy (shots on target)48%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cacahuatique is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Cacahuatique · 1 pts / match - CD Platense

Cacahuatique
LDWDD
Season result split
29% W31% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-15-20
1.16 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-10-11
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
WDLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.82BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
CD Platense
LDWDL
Season result split
20% W41% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-19-18
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-8-10
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DDDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cacahuatique scoring profile: very strong

Cacahuatique scores in 73% of matches (36 of 49 matches), while CD Platense keeps a clean sheet in 22% (10 of 46 matches).

CD Platense scoring profile: strong

CD Platense scores in 67% of matches (31 of 46 matches), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 29% (14 of 49 matches).

58Goals scored (season)56
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
67Goals conceded (season)66
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
2.55Average goals in match2.65
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
5Goals scored (last 5)4
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
7Goals conceded (last 5)4
CacahuatiqueCD Platense

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal67%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
24%2 goals33%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
12%3 goals17%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
4%4 goals4%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal78%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
41%2 goals35%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
18%3 goals20%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
4%4 goals7%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time17%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
0%BTTS in both halves7%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
12%Scored in both halves15%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
60%BTTS - last 540%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cacahuatique is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.43 pts / match - Cacahuatique · 1.13 pts / match - CD Platense

Cacahuatique - half-time state
33% leading45% draw22% trailing
CD Platense - half-time state
22% leading48% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per match (1st half)1.13
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
0.63Goals scored (1st half)0.52
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
0.45Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
1.08Average goals (1st half)1.11
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
69%Clean sheet before half-time52%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
55%No goal before half-time63%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense

After half-time (2nd half)

1.08Points per match (2nd half)0.98
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
0.55Goals scored (2nd half)0.7
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
0.92Goals conceded (2nd half)0.85
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.54
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
41%Clean sheet after half-time46%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
59%No goal after half-time54%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense

Cacahuatique - second-half results

27% W29% R45% P
70
Half-time points
31
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
-18
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding88%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CD Platense - second-half results

17% W46% R37% P
52
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding91%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 20%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cacahuatique - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
CD Platense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cacahuatique
ScoredConceded
11
8
0-15
12
6
16-30
8
8
31-45
7
13
46-60
8
15
61-75
12
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

CD Platense
ScoredConceded
6
9
0-15
6
7
16-30
12
11
31-45
10
10
46-60
12
14
61-75
10
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cacahuatique

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

CD Platense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

CacahuatiqueLigaCD Platense
Average goals in match 2.552.67 2.65
Both teams scored 57%53% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%50% 41%
Clean sheets 29%27% 22%
Goal before half-time 63%68% 67%
Goal after half-time 82%78% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Cacahuatique 1 - 1 - 1 CD Platense. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.

CD Platense
0 : 1
Cacahuatique
Cacahuatique
1 : 3
CD Platense
CD Platense
1 : 1
Cacahuatique

FAQ

What was the result of Cacahuatique vs CD Platense?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Cacahuatique 1:1 CD Platense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cacahuatique and CD Platense?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Cacahuatique won 1, CD Platense won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cacahuatique vs CD Platense?

Cacahuatique score 1.18 goals per game on average and CD Platense 1.22. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Cacahuatique's matches and 57% of CD Platense's.

What form are Cacahuatique and CD Platense in?

Over the last 5 games Cacahuatique have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and CD Platense 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cacahuatique vs CD Platense?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.