El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 23 July 2026

Cacahuatique vs Inter: match statistics

Cacahuatique crest
Cacahuatique
5 : 0half-time 4:0
Inter crest
Inter
130%(2.40)
X40%(3.15)
230%(2.68)

Statistical analysis indicates a closely contested match between two teams in poor form. Cacahuatique has a disastrous home record with just an 11% win rate and a -15 goal difference; however, Inter also displays weak away results (19% wins, -7 goal difference). The recent form over the last five matches is unfavorable for both sides – the hosts have averaged a mere 0.4 points per game, while the visitors have fared slightly better with 1.4 points. The high draw percentage of both teams (37% for Cacahuatique at home, 31% for Inter away), combined with similar xG statistics and average goals scored, suggests the match will end in a draw. Inter's slight advantage in recent form is neutralized by the hosts' home advantage.

Cacahuatique vs Inter: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cacahuatique play Inter in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match date is 21 March 2026 at 22:00. Final score: 5:0.

Current form

Cacahuatique: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Inter: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cacahuatique scores 1.18 and concedes 1.37 goals per match. Inter scores 1.13 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cacahuatique 57%, Inter 51%. Over 2.5: Cacahuatique 55%, Inter 53%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Cacahuatique has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.25. Cacahuatique: 8.9 shots per match, Inter: 7.8.

Match halves

Cacahuatique: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.55. Inter: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.64.

Goals by minute

Cacahuatique: 16-30 (12 goals). Inter: 31-45+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Statistical analysis indicates a closely contested match between two teams in poor form. Cacahuatique has a disastrous home record with just an 11% win rate and a -15 goal difference; however, Inter also displays weak away results (19% wins, -7 goal difference). The recent form over the last five matches is unfavorable for both sides – the hosts have averaged a mere 0.4 points per game, while the visitors have fared slightly better with 1.4 points. The high draw percentage of both teams (37% for Cacahuatique at home, 31% for Inter away), combined with similar xG statistics and average goals scored, suggests the match will end in a draw. Inter's slight advantage in recent form is neutralized by the hosts' home advantage.

Half-by-half

4 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
CacahuatiqueInter
18Shots15
CacahuatiqueInter
10Shots on target6
CacahuatiqueInter
2.16xG1.7
CacahuatiqueInter
5Corners3
CacahuatiqueInter
45Dangerous attacks46
CacahuatiqueInter
-1Fouls-1
CacahuatiqueInter
-1Cards-1
CacahuatiqueInter

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.18Goals scored / match1.13
CacahuatiqueInter
1.37Goals conceded / match1.4
CacahuatiqueInter
47%Average possession53%
CacahuatiqueInter
4.27Shots on target / match3.56
CacahuatiqueInter

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.88Shots per match7.78
CacahuatiqueInter
4.27Shots on target3.56
CacahuatiqueInter
13.3%Shot conversion14.6%
CacahuatiqueInter
47%Possession53%
CacahuatiqueInter
1.4xG for1.25
CacahuatiqueInter
1.57xG against1.22
CacahuatiqueInter

Shooting quality

Cacahuatique: Counter-attackingInter: Efficient finishing
CacahuatiqueInter
Accuracy (shots on target)48%46%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Inter is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Cacahuatique · 1.8 pts / match - Inter

Cacahuatique
LDWDD
Season result split
29% W31% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-15-20
1.16 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-10-11
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
WDLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.82BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Inter
WWLLW
Season result split
29% W33% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-15-17
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-7-11
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cacahuatique scoring profile: very strong

Cacahuatique scores in 73% of matches (36 of 49 matches), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 27% (12 of 45 matches).

Inter scoring profile: strong

Inter scores in 64% of matches (29 of 45 matches), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 29% (14 of 49 matches).

58Goals scored (season)51
CacahuatiqueInter
67Goals conceded (season)63
CacahuatiqueInter
2.55Average goals in match2.53
CacahuatiqueInter
5Goals scored (last 5)5
CacahuatiqueInter
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
CacahuatiqueInter

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal64%
CacahuatiqueInter
24%2 goals40%
CacahuatiqueInter
12%3 goals9%
CacahuatiqueInter
4%4 goals0%
CacahuatiqueInter

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal73%
CacahuatiqueInter
41%2 goals47%
CacahuatiqueInter
18%3 goals16%
CacahuatiqueInter
4%4 goals2%
CacahuatiqueInter

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time20%
CacahuatiqueInter
0%BTTS in both halves4%
CacahuatiqueInter
12%Scored in both halves16%
CacahuatiqueInter

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
CacahuatiqueInter
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
CacahuatiqueInter
60%BTTS - last 540%
CacahuatiqueInter

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
CacahuatiqueInter
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
CacahuatiqueInter
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
CacahuatiqueInter

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
CacahuatiqueInter
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
CacahuatiqueInter
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
CacahuatiqueInter

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cacahuatique is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.43 pts / match - Cacahuatique · 1.18 pts / match - Inter

Cacahuatique - half-time state
33% leading45% draw22% trailing
Inter - half-time state
22% leading51% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per match (1st half)1.18
CacahuatiqueInter
0.63Goals scored (1st half)0.49
CacahuatiqueInter
0.45Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
CacahuatiqueInter
1.08Average goals (1st half)1.11
CacahuatiqueInter
69%Clean sheet before half-time56%
CacahuatiqueInter
55%No goal before half-time64%
CacahuatiqueInter

After half-time (2nd half)

1.08Points per match (2nd half)1.27
CacahuatiqueInter
0.55Goals scored (2nd half)0.64
CacahuatiqueInter
0.92Goals conceded (2nd half)0.78
CacahuatiqueInter
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.42
CacahuatiqueInter
41%Clean sheet after half-time44%
CacahuatiqueInter
59%No goal after half-time56%
CacahuatiqueInter

Cacahuatique - second-half results

27% W29% R45% P
70
Half-time points
31
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
-18
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding88%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Inter - second-half results

33% W27% R40% P
53
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
57
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cacahuatique - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Inter - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.00
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-3+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cacahuatique
ScoredConceded
11
8
0-15
12
6
16-30
8
8
31-45
7
13
46-60
8
15
61-75
12
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Inter
ScoredConceded
6
5
0-15
3
14
16-30
13
9
31-45
11
8
46-60
6
10
61-75
12
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.54
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cacahuatique

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Inter

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

CacahuatiqueLigaInter
Average goals in match 2.552.67 2.53
Both teams scored 57%53% 51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%50% 53%
Clean sheets 29%27% 27%
Goal before half-time 63%68% 60%
Goal after half-time 82%78% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Cacahuatique 1 - 0 - 1 Inter. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Inter
2 : 1
Cacahuatique
Inter
1 : 2
Cacahuatique

FAQ

What was the result of Cacahuatique vs Inter?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Cacahuatique 5:0 Inter. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cacahuatique and Inter?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Cacahuatique won 1, Inter won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cacahuatique vs Inter?

Cacahuatique score 1.18 goals per game on average and Inter 1.13. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Cacahuatique's matches and 51% of Inter's.

What form are Cacahuatique and Inter in?

Over the last 5 games Cacahuatique have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Inter 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cacahuatique vs Inter?

The statistical background for Cacahuatique vs Inter — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.