El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 20 September 2026

Cacahuatique vs Inter: match statistics

Cacahuatique crest
Cacahuatique
5 : 0half-time 4:0
Inter crest
Inter
130%(2.40)
X40%(3.15)
230%(2.68)

Statistical analysis indicates a closely contested match between two teams in poor form. Cacahuatique has a disastrous home record with just an 11% win rate and a -15 goal difference; however, Inter also displays weak away results (19% wins, -7 goal difference). The recent form over the last five matches is unfavorable for both sides – the hosts have averaged a mere 0.4 points per game, while the visitors have fared slightly better with 1.4 points. The high draw percentage of both teams (37% for Cacahuatique at home, 31% for Inter away), combined with similar xG statistics and average goals scored, suggests the match will end in a draw. Inter's slight advantage in recent form is neutralized by the hosts' home advantage.

Cacahuatique vs Inter: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cacahuatique played Inter in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 21 March 2026. Final score: 5:0.

Current form

Cacahuatique: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Inter: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cacahuatique scores 1.16 and concedes 1.45 goals per match. Inter scores 1.18 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cacahuatique 58%, Inter 53%. Over 2.5: Cacahuatique 61%, Inter 50%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Cacahuatique has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.24. Cacahuatique: 8.7 shots per match, Inter: 7.6.

Match halves

Cacahuatique: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.53. Inter: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.68.

Goals by minute

Cacahuatique: 76-90+ (11 goals). Inter: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates a closely contested match between two teams in poor form. Cacahuatique has a disastrous home record with just an 11% win rate and a -15 goal difference; however, Inter also displays weak away results (19% wins, -7 goal difference). The recent form over the last five matches is unfavorable for both sides – the hosts have averaged a mere 0.4 points per game, while the visitors have fared slightly better with 1.4 points. The high draw percentage of both teams (37% for Cacahuatique at home, 31% for Inter away), combined with similar xG statistics and average goals scored, suggests the match will end in a draw. Inter's slight advantage in recent form is neutralized by the hosts' home advantage.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

4 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
CacahuatiqueInter
18Shots15
CacahuatiqueInter
10Shots on target6
CacahuatiqueInter
2.16xG1.7
CacahuatiqueInter
5Corners3
CacahuatiqueInter
45Dangerous attacks46
CacahuatiqueInter
-1Fouls-1
CacahuatiqueInter
-1Cards-1
CacahuatiqueInter

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.16Goals scored / match1.18
CacahuatiqueInter
1.45Goals conceded / match1.29
CacahuatiqueInter
48%Average possession53%
CacahuatiqueInter
4.03Shots on target / match3.62
CacahuatiqueInter

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.68Shots per match7.56
CacahuatiqueInter
4.03Shots on target3.62
CacahuatiqueInter
13.3%Shot conversion15.6%
CacahuatiqueInter
48%Possession53%
CacahuatiqueInter
1.4xG for1.24
CacahuatiqueInter
1.53xG against1.21
CacahuatiqueInter

Shooting quality

Cacahuatique: Efficient finishingInter: Efficient finishing
CacahuatiqueInter
Accuracy (shots on target)46%48%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Inter is 250% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Cacahuatique · 1.4 pts / match - Inter

Cacahuatique
LDLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
29% W26% D45% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-10-17
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-7-10
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LDLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Inter
LLWWD
Season result split
26% W35% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-12-13
1.15 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-8
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DWLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Inter is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.45 goals / match - Cacahuatique · 1.29 goals / match - Inter

Cacahuatique scoring profile: very strong

Cacahuatique scores in 74% of matches (28 of 38 matches), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

Inter scoring profile: strong

Inter scores in 68% of matches (23 of 34 matches), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 29% (11 of 38 matches).

44Goals scored (season)40
CacahuatiqueInter
55Goals conceded (season)44
CacahuatiqueInter
2.61Average goals in match2.47
CacahuatiqueInter
2Goals scored (last 5)4
CacahuatiqueInter
9Goals conceded (last 5)3
CacahuatiqueInter

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal68%
CacahuatiqueInter
26%2 goals38%
CacahuatiqueInter
11%3 goals12%
CacahuatiqueInter
3%4 goals0%
CacahuatiqueInter

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal71%
CacahuatiqueInter
45%2 goals44%
CacahuatiqueInter
21%3 goals15%
CacahuatiqueInter
5%4 goals0%
CacahuatiqueInter

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time21%
CacahuatiqueInter
0%BTTS in both halves6%
CacahuatiqueInter
11%Scored in both halves18%
CacahuatiqueInter

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
CacahuatiqueInter
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
CacahuatiqueInter
40%BTTS - last 520%
CacahuatiqueInter

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

66%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
CacahuatiqueInter
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
CacahuatiqueInter
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
CacahuatiqueInter

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
CacahuatiqueInter
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
CacahuatiqueInter
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
CacahuatiqueInter

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cacahuatique is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.39 pts / match - Cacahuatique · 1.24 pts / match - Inter

Cacahuatique - half-time state
32% leading45% draw24% trailing
Inter - half-time state
24% leading53% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.39Points per match (1st half)1.24
CacahuatiqueInter
0.63Goals scored (1st half)0.5
CacahuatiqueInter
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
CacahuatiqueInter
1.13Average goals (1st half)1.03
CacahuatiqueInter
66%Clean sheet before half-time59%
CacahuatiqueInter
53%No goal before half-time62%
CacahuatiqueInter

After half-time (2nd half)

1.05Points per match (2nd half)1.26
CacahuatiqueInter
0.53Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
CacahuatiqueInter
0.95Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
CacahuatiqueInter
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.44
CacahuatiqueInter
42%Clean sheet after half-time47%
CacahuatiqueInter
63%No goal after half-time53%
CacahuatiqueInter

Cacahuatique - second-half results

26% W26% D47% L
53
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.39
PPG before half-time
Lead holding91%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Inter - second-half results

32% W29% D38% L
42
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding108%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cacahuatique - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.20
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-2-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Inter - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.41.0
1 goal20%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cacahuatique
ScoredConceded
9
7
0-15
9
5
16-30
6
7
31-45
4
11
46-60
5
14
61-75
11
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Inter
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
1
9
16-30
10
7
31-45
10
5
46-60
5
8
61-75
8
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.54
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cacahuatique

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.73
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Inter

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

CacahuatiqueLigaInter
Average goals in match 2.612.72 2.47
Both teams scored 58%55% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 61%53% 50%
Clean sheets 29%27% 29%
Goal before half-time 66%68% 59%
Goal after half-time 79%77% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.36
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Carlos Daniel Hernández Márquez⚽ 1
Elías Umere⚽ 1
Óscar Elías Cerén Delgado⚽ 2
Reinaldo Adalberto Aparicio Romero⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CacahuatiqueGoalCarlos Daniel Hernández Márquez
  2. CacahuatiqueGoalÓscar Elías Cerén Delgado
  3. CacahuatiqueGoalReinaldo Adalberto Aparicio Romero
  4. CacahuatiqueGoalÓscar Elías Cerén Delgado
  5. CacahuatiqueGoalElías Umere

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

José MeléndezMatches officiated: 9
-Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 267%Home wins22%Draws11%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Cacahuatique 1 - 0 - 1 Inter. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Inter
2 : 1
Cacahuatique
Inter
1 : 2
Cacahuatique

FAQ

What was the result of Cacahuatique vs Inter?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Cacahuatique 5:0 Inter. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cacahuatique and Inter?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Cacahuatique won 1, Inter won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cacahuatique vs Inter?

Cacahuatique score 1.16 goals per game on average and Inter 1.18. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Cacahuatique's matches and 53% of Inter's.

What form are Cacahuatique and Inter in?

Over the last 5 games Cacahuatique have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Inter 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cacahuatique vs Inter?

The statistical background for Cacahuatique vs Inter — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.