Northern Ireland - NIFL PremiershipBelfast Loughshore Hotel ArenaData current as of 23 October 2026

Carrick Rangers vs Cliftonville: match statistics

Carrick Rangers crest
Carrick Rangers
1 : 3half-time 1:2
Cliftonville crest
Cliftonville

Carrick Rangers vs Cliftonville: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Carrick Rangers played Cliftonville in NIFL Premiership (Northern Ireland). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: Belfast Loughshore Hotel Arena. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Carrick Rangers: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Cliftonville: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Carrick Rangers scores 1.40 and concedes 0.80 goals per match. Cliftonville scores 1.60 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.66 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Carrick Rangers 20%, Cliftonville 40%. Over 2.5: Carrick Rangers 40%, Cliftonville 60%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Carrick Rangers has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.45. Carrick Rangers: 13.0 shots per match, Cliftonville: 12.4.

Match halves

Carrick Rangers: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.80. Cliftonville: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

Carrick Rangers: 61-75 (3 goals). Cliftonville: 16-30 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NIFL Premiership: 2.66 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Both teams have collected 9 points from their last five matches, winning 3 games each, but Cliftonville have posted significantly stronger away figures. The visitors score an average of 1.5 goals away from home from 4 shots on target per match, while Carrick Rangers manage just 0.5 goals at home and have failed to score in 50% of such fixtures. Cliftonville also have a 13% shooting accuracy rate, compared with just 4% for the hosts, which could prove decisive when it comes to converting a limited number of chances. Carrick do create better chances according to xG, 1.62 compared with 1.45, but the visitors concede only 0.5 goals per away match and keep a clean sheet in 50% of their outings. With Cliftonville also enjoying greater possession, 56% compared with 49%, the marginal lean is towards an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points towards BTTS - No, as Cliftonville kept a clean sheet in 50% of matches, while Carrick Rangers failed to score in 33% of games. Recent form also lowers the rating of the both-teams-to-score scenario: BTTS occurred in only 20% of Carrick Rangers’ last five matches and in 40% of Cliftonville’s games. The hosts have conceded an average of 0.8 goals per match recently, while Cliftonville have conceded just 1.0, increasing the likelihood that one of the defences will keep the opposition scoreless. Offensive potential remains noticeable, with average xG figures of 1.49 for Carrick Rangers and 1.53 for Cliftonville, but the overall league BTTS rate is only 41%, making the scenario in which at least one team fails to score more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The projected total of 2.55 goals is based on similar attacking potential: both teams average 1.45 xG, while over their last five matches the figures are 1.49 and 1.53, respectively. However, Cliftonville concede just 0.50 goals per match in the league and keep a clean sheet in 50% of their games, which limits expectations for the hosts despite their average of 1.67 goals scored. In their last five matches, Carrick Rangers have conceded only 0.80 goals per game, while the overall rate of matches finishing Over 3.5 goals stands at just 33% for the hosts and 0% for the visitors. The Under 3.5 line therefore has a clear edge, as neither team has recorded a game with at least four goals in Cliftonville’s matches, while the visitors’ defense particularly supports a result in the 1-3 goal range.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest HT/FT scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Cliftonville win, as Carrick Rangers were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches, while Cliftonville were not trailing at half-time in any of them. Both teams kept a clean sheet before the break in 100% of the matches analysed, strongly supporting a cautious and even opening period. Cliftonville, however, have the more solid defence over the course of the season, conceding an average of just 0.5 goals per match compared with 1.33 for the hosts. Both teams generate identical average xG of 1.45, but Carrick concede an average of 1.33 goals after half-time, giving the visitors a better chance of turning the match in their favour in the second half.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
Carrick RangersCliftonville
11Shots11
Carrick RangersCliftonville
5Shots on target7
Carrick RangersCliftonville
1.62xG1.5
Carrick RangersCliftonville
8Corners3
Carrick RangersCliftonville
80Dangerous attacks43
Carrick RangersCliftonville
10Fouls11
Carrick RangersCliftonville
3Cards0
Carrick RangersCliftonville

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Carrick RangersCliftonville
1.4Goals scored / match1.6
Carrick RangersCliftonville
0.8Goals conceded / match1
Carrick RangersCliftonville
43%Average possession56%
Carrick RangersCliftonville
3.6Shots on target / match4.6
Carrick RangersCliftonville

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13Shots per match12.4
Carrick RangersCliftonville
3.6Shots on target4.6
Carrick RangersCliftonville
10.8%Shot conversion12.9%
Carrick RangersCliftonville
43%Possession56%
Carrick RangersCliftonville
1.53xG for1.45
Carrick RangersCliftonville
1.36xG against1.52
Carrick RangersCliftonville

Shooting quality

Carrick Rangers: BalancedCliftonville: Balanced
Carrick RangersCliftonville
Accuracy (shots on target)28%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Carrick Rangers
WWLWL
Season result split
60% W0% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Cliftonville
WWLLW
Season result split
60% W0% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 away
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cliftonville is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

1.4 goals / match - Carrick Rangers · 1.6 goals / match - Cliftonville

Carrick Rangers is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.8 goals / match - Carrick Rangers · 1 goals / match - Cliftonville

Carrick Rangers scoring profile: strong

Carrick Rangers scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Cliftonville keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

Cliftonville scoring profile: mixed

Cliftonville scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Carrick Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).

7Goals scored (season)8
Carrick RangersCliftonville
4Goals conceded (season)5
Carrick RangersCliftonville
2.2Average goals in match2.6
Carrick RangersCliftonville
7Goals scored (last 5)8
Carrick RangersCliftonville
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
Carrick RangersCliftonville

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal60%
Carrick RangersCliftonville
40%2 goals60%
Carrick RangersCliftonville
20%3 goals40%
Carrick RangersCliftonville
20%4 goals0%
Carrick RangersCliftonville

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal80%
Carrick RangersCliftonville
20%2 goals20%
Carrick RangersCliftonville
0%3 goals0%
Carrick RangersCliftonville
0%4 goals0%
Carrick RangersCliftonville

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

41%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Carrick RangersCliftonville
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Carrick RangersCliftonville
20%Scored in both halves60%
Carrick RangersCliftonville

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Carrick RangersCliftonville
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
Carrick RangersCliftonville
20%BTTS - last 540%
Carrick RangersCliftonville

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

40%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Carrick RangersCliftonville
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Carrick RangersCliftonville
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Carrick RangersCliftonville

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Carrick RangersCliftonville
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
Carrick RangersCliftonville
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Carrick RangersCliftonville

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cliftonville is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.8 pts / match - Carrick Rangers · 2.2 pts / match - Cliftonville

Carrick Rangers - half-time state
40% leading60% draw0% trailing
Cliftonville - half-time state
60% leading40% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.8Points per match (1st half)2.2
Carrick RangersCliftonville
0.6Goals scored (1st half)1
Carrick RangersCliftonville
0Goals conceded (1st half)0
Carrick RangersCliftonville
0.6Average goals (1st half)1
Carrick RangersCliftonville
100%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Carrick RangersCliftonville
60%No goal before half-time40%
Carrick RangersCliftonville

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)1
Carrick RangersCliftonville
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
Carrick RangersCliftonville
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Carrick RangersCliftonville
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1.6
Carrick RangersCliftonville
40%Clean sheet after half-time20%
Carrick RangersCliftonville
60%No goal after half-time40%
Carrick RangersCliftonville

Carrick Rangers - second-half results

40% W0% D60% L
9
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cliftonville - second-half results

20% W40% D40% L
11
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Carrick Rangers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.8
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Cliftonville - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.00
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+5-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Carrick Rangers
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
0
31-45
0
3
46-60
3
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Cliftonville
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
2
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
3
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.40
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
30%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+25%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
36%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Carrick Rangers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.56
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
54%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Cliftonville

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.67
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NIFL Premiership).

Teams vs league

Carrick RangersLigaCliftonville
Average goals in match▼ 2.202.66• 2.60
Both teams scored▼ 20%41%• 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 40%55%▲ 60%
Clean sheets▲ 40%31%▼ 20%
Goal before half-time▼ 40%66%▼ 60%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%90%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.66
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.17
Home goals / match
1.48
Away goals / match
+-21%
Home attack advantage
+-26%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
90%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Carrick RangersGoalCaleb Hawthorne
  2. CliftonvilleGoalDavid Kyle McClelland
  3. CliftonvilleGoalBen Quinn
  4. Carrick RangersSubstitutionOn: Adam LeckyOff: Daire O'Connor
  5. Carrick RangersYellow cardAidan Steele
  6. Carrick RangersSubstitutionOn: Jack HastingsOff: Nedas Macuilaitis
  7. Carrick RangersSubstitutionOn: Joseph MooreOff: Caleb Hawthorne
  8. Carrick RangersYellow cardKyle Cherry
  9. CliftonvilleGoalDean McMaster

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Carrick Rangers 1 - 0 - 2 Cliftonville. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Cliftonville FC
1 : 4
Carrick Rangers FC
Carrick Rangers FC
0 : 1
Cliftonville FC
Carrick Rangers FC
1 : 2
Cliftonville FC

FAQ

What was the result of Carrick Rangers vs Cliftonville?

The NIFL Premiership match finished Carrick Rangers 1:3 Cliftonville. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Carrick Rangers and Cliftonville?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Carrick Rangers won 1, Cliftonville won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Carrick Rangers vs Cliftonville?

Carrick Rangers score 1.40 goals per game on average and Cliftonville 1.60. The NIFL Premiership average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 20% of Carrick Rangers's matches and 40% of Cliftonville's.

What form are Carrick Rangers and Cliftonville in?

Over the last 5 games Carrick Rangers have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Cliftonville 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Carrick Rangers vs Cliftonville?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.