Catania vs Picerno: match statistics
Catania vs Picerno: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Catania play Picerno in Serie C Group C (Italy). The match date is 6 April 2026 at 14:30. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Catania: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Picerno: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Catania scores 1.42 and concedes 0.66 goals per match. Picerno scores 1.13 and concedes 1.45. League average: 2.49 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Catania 37%, Picerno 63%. Over 2.5: Catania 29%, Picerno 55%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
Catania has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.17. Catania: 12.3 shots per match, Picerno: 9.1.
Match halves
Catania: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.79. Picerno: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.42.
Goals by minute
Catania: 76-90+ (14 goals). Picerno: 16-30 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie C Group C: 2.49 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
I back the home win ('1'). Catania has 19 wins and 51 goals this season, sits 2nd in the table, wins 76% of matches at home and keeps a clean sheet in 94% of home games. In the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 5 goals and average 1.6 points per game, while Picerno have only 3 goals in their last five, 0 wins and average 0.6 points. Catania creates significantly more chances: at home they average 13 shots and 5.18 shots on target with xG 1.59, whereas Picerno away average 7.47 shots, 2.59 on target and xG 0.99. Defensively the gap is clear — Catania concedes 0.06 goals on average at home with xG against 0.88, while Picerno concede 1.82 goals away with xG against 1.86, hence probability assessment 75%/15%/10%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Catania | Picerno | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Picerno is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Catania · 1.6 pts / match - Picerno
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Catania is 26% better for: goals scored per match.
1.42 goals / match - Catania · 1.13 goals / match - Picerno
Catania is 120% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.66 goals / match - Catania · 1.45 goals / match - Picerno
Catania scores in 82% of matches (31 of 38 matches), while Picerno keeps a clean sheet in 18% (7 of 38 matches).
Picerno scores in 71% of matches (27 of 38 matches), while Catania keeps a clean sheet in 58% (22 of 38 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Catania
Over / Under — Picerno
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Catania is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.55 pts / match - Catania · 1.47 pts / match - Picerno
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Catania - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Picerno - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 24%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Catania
Picerno
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).
Teams vs league
| Catania | Liga | Picerno | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.08 | 2.49 | • 2.58 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 37% | 51% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 29% | 46% | ▲ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 58% | 28% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 67% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 79% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Catania 1 - 0 - 0 Picerno. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Catania vs Picerno?
The Serie C Group C match finished Catania 1:2 Picerno. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Catania vs Picerno?
Catania score 1.42 goals per game on average and Picerno 1.13. The Serie C Group C average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Catania's matches and 63% of Picerno's.
What form are Catania and Picerno in?
Over the last 5 games Catania have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Picerno 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Catania vs Picerno?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.