Canada - Canadian Premier LeagueSpruce MeadowsData current as of 23 July 2026

Cavalry FC vs Pacific FC: match statistics

Cavalry FC crest
Cavalry FC
3 : 0half-time 0:0
Pacific FC crest
Pacific FC

Cavalry FC vs Pacific FC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cavalry FC play Pacific FC in Canadian Premier League (Canada). The match date is 24 May 2026 at 23:00. Venue: Spruce Meadows. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Cavalry FC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Pacific FC: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cavalry FC scores 1.92 and concedes 0.50 goals per match. Pacific FC scores 1.08 and concedes 2.25. League average: 2.90 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cavalry FC 42%, Pacific FC 75%. Over 2.5: Cavalry FC 42%, Pacific FC 75%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Cavalry FC has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.18. Cavalry FC: 15.0 shots per match, Pacific FC: 9.8.

Match halves

Cavalry FC: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.17. Pacific FC: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Cavalry FC: 76-90+ (6 goals). Pacific FC: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Canadian Premier League: 2.90 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

5 H2H matches: 3-1-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 40%.

Match description

I forecast a home win because Cavalry FC holds a clear advantage in form and home metrics. At home Cavalry has a record of 4 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, scoring 2.0 goals and conceding 1.0 on average per match with an average xG of 1.81 versus 1.20. In the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 7 goals and recorded 3 wins (form ddwww, averaging 2.2 points per game), while Pacific scored 4 and conceded 10 in that period (form dllll, averaging 0.2 points per game). Additionally, Cavalry averages 16 shots and 6 on target per home game, whereas Pacific away averages only 7 shots and 3 on target and concedes 2.0 goals per away match. Although Pacific’s conversion rate is high (~29% versus Cavalry’s 13%), the low shot volume and high goals conceded in recent games favor a home victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
3 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Cavalry FCPacific FC
18Shots7
Cavalry FCPacific FC
6Shots on target0
Cavalry FCPacific FC
1.88xG0.59
Cavalry FCPacific FC
5Corners4
Cavalry FCPacific FC
46Dangerous attacks20
Cavalry FCPacific FC
12Fouls6
Cavalry FCPacific FC
2Cards0
Cavalry FCPacific FC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Cavalry FCPacific FC
1.92Goals scored / match1.08
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0.5Goals conceded / match2.25
Cavalry FCPacific FC
50%Average possession51%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
5.5Shots on target / match3.25
Cavalry FCPacific FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15Shots per match9.83
Cavalry FCPacific FC
5.5Shots on target3.25
Cavalry FCPacific FC
12.8%Shot conversion11%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
50%Possession51%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
1.69xG for1.18
Cavalry FCPacific FC
1.13xG against1.7
Cavalry FCPacific FC

Shooting quality

Cavalry FC: AttackingPacific FC: Balanced
Cavalry FCPacific FC
Accuracy (shots on target)37%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cavalry FC is 400% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Cavalry FC · 0.4 pts / match - Pacific FC

Cavalry FC
LWWWD
Season result split
67% W25% R8% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-1
2.25 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.85Opponent xG: 0.97BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Pacific FC
DDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W25% R75% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-3-9
0.25 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-3
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cavalry FC is 78% better for: goals scored per match.

1.92 goals / match - Cavalry FC · 1.08 goals / match - Pacific FC

Cavalry FC is 350% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.5 goals / match - Cavalry FC · 2.25 goals / match - Pacific FC

Cavalry FC scoring profile: very strong

Cavalry FC scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while Pacific FC keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 12 matches).

Pacific FC scoring profile: strong

Pacific FC scores in 75% of matches (9 of 12 matches), while Cavalry FC keeps a clean sheet in 50% (6 of 12 matches).

23Goals scored (season)13
Cavalry FCPacific FC
6Goals conceded (season)27
Cavalry FCPacific FC
2.42Average goals in match3.33
Cavalry FCPacific FC
11Goals scored (last 5)7
Cavalry FCPacific FC
3Goals conceded (last 5)12
Cavalry FCPacific FC

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal75%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
58%2 goals33%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
33%3 goals0%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
8%4 goals0%
Cavalry FCPacific FC

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal100%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0%2 goals75%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0%3 goals33%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0%4 goals8%
Cavalry FCPacific FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time8%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0%BTTS in both halves8%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
25%Scored in both halves25%
Cavalry FCPacific FC

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
40%BTTS - last 5100%
Cavalry FCPacific FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

42%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time8%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Cavalry FCPacific FC

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time75%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
Cavalry FCPacific FC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cavalry FC is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / match - Cavalry FC · 1.25 pts / match - Pacific FC

Cavalry FC - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing
Pacific FC - half-time state
33% leading25% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per match (1st half)1.25
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.42
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0.08Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0.83Average goals (1st half)0.92
Cavalry FCPacific FC
92%Clean sheet before half-time58%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
58%No goal before half-time58%
Cavalry FCPacific FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.75Points per match (2nd half)0.25
Cavalry FCPacific FC
1.17Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0.42Goals conceded (2nd half)1.75
Cavalry FCPacific FC
1.58Average goals (2nd half)2.42
Cavalry FCPacific FC
58%Clean sheet after half-time0%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
33%No goal after half-time42%
Cavalry FCPacific FC

Cavalry FC - second-half results

42% W50% R8% P
20
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding203%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pacific FC - second-half results

0% W25% R75% P
15
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.3

Concedes 1.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cavalry FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+5+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Pacific FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.20
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.61.8
Average goals in match1.42.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+1-6
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cavalry FC
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
3
0
16-30
4
1
31-45
4
0
46-60
4
3
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Pacific FC
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
3
4
31-45
3
8
46-60
3
4
61-75
2
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.1 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+4%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cavalry FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.86
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.63
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
131%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
35%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Pacific FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.65
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
153%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Canadian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Cavalry FCLigaPacific FC
Average goals in match 2.422.90 3.33
Both teams scored 42%61% 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 42%53% 75%
Clean sheets 50%20% 0%
Goal before half-time 42%57% 75%
Goal after half-time 75%86% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.90
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.47
Home goals / match
1.43
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
33%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Cavalry FC 3 - 1 - 1 Pacific FC. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 40% matches.

Pacific FC
1 : 2
Cavalry FC
Pacific FC
3 : 3
Cavalry FC
Pacific FC
1 : 0
Cavalry FC
Cavalry FC
1 : 0
Pacific FC
Cavalry FC
4 : 0
Pacific FC

FAQ

What was the result of Cavalry FC vs Pacific FC?

The Canadian Premier League match finished Cavalry FC 3:0 Pacific FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cavalry FC and Pacific FC?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Cavalry FC won 3, Pacific FC won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cavalry FC vs Pacific FC?

Cavalry FC score 1.92 goals per game on average and Pacific FC 1.08. The Canadian Premier League average is 2.90 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Cavalry FC's matches and 75% of Pacific FC's.

What form are Cavalry FC and Pacific FC in?

Over the last 5 games Cavalry FC have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Pacific FC 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cavalry FC vs Pacific FC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.