CD Feirense vs Torreense: match statistics
CD Feirense vs Torreense: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
CD Feirense played Torreense in LigaPro (Portugal). The match was played on 28 April 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
CD Feirense: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Torreense: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
CD Feirense scores 1.07 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. Torreense scores 1.23 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.45 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: CD Feirense 43%, Torreense 30%. Over 2.5: CD Feirense 40%, Torreense 40%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 45%.
xG, shots and style
CD Feirense has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.43. CD Feirense: 13.5 shots per match, Torreense: 11.8.
Match halves
CD Feirense: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.63. Torreense: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.83.
Goals by minute
CD Feirense: 76-90+ (9 goals). Torreense: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
LigaPro: 2.45 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 45%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorites appear to be the visitors, Torreense, who sit 4th compared to Feirense’s 11th and have more wins this season (15 vs 11) and a higher average points return in the last 5 matches (2.0 vs 1.8). In their last 5 fixtures Torreense have scored 7 goals versus the hosts’ 4 and demonstrate better shot efficiency (conversion 11% vs 8%), despite both teams recording the same average shots on target (3.73 per match). Feirense, however, generate higher xG at home (xG 1.53 vs 1.35 for Torreense away) and concede fewer goals at home (0.80 per match versus 0.93 conceded by the visitors), indicating defensive solidity. The visitors have a superior season goal difference in terms of goals scored (37 scored vs 32) and have fewer defeats in their last five (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss for Torreense vs 3 wins and 2 losses for Feirense), reflecting greater result stability. Considering the visitors’ positional advantage and efficiency, I predict a Torreense win, though I expect a narrow scoreline given Feirense’s 47% clean sheet rate in home matches and the small xG margins.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season BTTS rates are 40% for CD Feirense and 20% for Torreense, and BTTS occurred in only 20% of both teams' last 5 matches, which clearly argues against a "both teams to score" scenario. Torreense in their last 5 matches averaged 1.4 goals scored and only 0.6 conceded, has a season clean sheet rate of 40% and a seasonal goals conceded average of 0.93, so they frequently keep opponents off the scoresheet. Feirense generate higher xG (1.51) and more shots (12.47 with 4.87 on target) compared to Torreense (xG against 1.54 and 3.73 shots on target), however they actually score only 1.2 goals per game, indicating moderate finishing. League average BTTS is 46% with 2.44 goals per match, but the league’s high clean sheet percentage of 64% and the teams’ seasonal clean sheets (33% and 40%) favor No Goal. Considering the low BTTS in the last 5 matches (20%), Torreense’s stronger recent defense and Feirense’s lower real finishing, I assign 70% probability to the "no" outcome and 30% to "yes" (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model and match averages indicate expected goals of 1.53 for CD Feirense and 1.34 for Torreense, totaling 2.87 goals. This comes from comparing Feirense’s xG 1.51 with xG allowed by Torreense 1.54 (avg. 1.53 for the home side) and Torreense’s xG 1.35 with xG allowed by Feirense 1.33 (avg. 1.34 for the away side). With total λ≈2.87 the Poisson distribution yields estimated P(Over 1.5) ≈78%, P(Over 2.5) ≈55% and P(Over 3.5) ≈32% (respective Unders: 22%, 45%, 68%). Seasonal metrics confirm Over 1.5 occurs in 60% of Feirense’s matches and 53% of Torreense’s, while Over 2.5 occurs in only 40% for both teams, explaining a moderate edge for 2.5. In the last 5 matches Torreense scored 7 goals (1.4 avg.) and Feirense 4 goals (0.8 avg.), so the strongest signal from the data supports a bet on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time the most likely scenario is a draw — both teams record a draw at the break in 40% of matches (drawingAtHTPercentage_home=40.0 and drawingAtHTPercentage_away=40.0). The home side, however, holds the advantage over the full match: they win 53% of home games (winPercentage_home=53.0), produce higher xG (1.51 vs 1.35) and more shots on target (4.87 vs 3.73), so they are more likely to tilt the result in their favour after the break. The second half delivers goals — average second-half goals are 1.4 for Feirense and 1.47 for Torreense (AVG_2hg_home=1.4, AVG_2hg_away=1.47) — which increases the probability of a decision after half-time. In the last 5 matches Feirense scored 5 goals before the break versus 1 for Torreense (last5_GoalsHT_overall_home=5 vs last5_GoalsHT_overall_away=1), which further supports the home side. On this basis I select X/1 (draw at half-time, home win at full-time) as the strongest signal and assign it the highest probability in the distribution.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| CD Feirense | Torreense | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Torreense is 11% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - CD Feirense · 2 pts / match - Torreense
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Torreense is 15% better for: goals scored per match.
1.07 goals / match - CD Feirense · 1.23 goals / match - Torreense
Torreense is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.17 goals / match - CD Feirense · 1 goals / match - Torreense
CD Feirense scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Torreense keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).
Torreense scores in 60% of matches (18 of 30 matches), while CD Feirense keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CD Feirense
Over / Under - Torreense
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Torreense is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / match - CD Feirense · 1.3 pts / match - Torreense
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CD Feirense - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Torreense - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
CD Feirense
Torreense
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (LigaPro).
Teams vs league
| CD Feirense | Liga | Torreense | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.23 | 2.45 | ▼ 2.23 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 46% | ▼ 30% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 45% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | • 33% | 32% | ▲ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 64% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 77% | • 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: CD Feirense 1 - 0 - 0 Torreense. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of CD Feirense vs Torreense?
The LigaPro match finished CD Feirense 0:0 Torreense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CD Feirense vs Torreense?
CD Feirense score 1.07 goals per game on average and Torreense 1.23. The LigaPro average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 43% of CD Feirense's matches and 30% of Torreense's.
What form are CD Feirense and Torreense in?
Over the last 5 games CD Feirense have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Torreense 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Feirense vs Torreense?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


