Portugal - Liga 3Data current as of 23 July 2026

CD Mafra vs CD Trofense: match statistics

CD Mafra crest
CD Mafra
1 : 0half-time 0:0
CD Trofense crest
CD Trofense

CD Mafra vs CD Trofense: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CD Mafra play CD Trofense in Liga 3 (Portugal). The match date is 25 April 2026 at 21:30. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

CD Mafra: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. CD Trofense: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

CD Mafra scores 1.41 and concedes 1.34 goals per match. CD Trofense scores 0.94 and concedes 0.97. League average: 2.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CD Mafra 63%, CD Trofense 47%. Over 2.5: CD Mafra 47%, CD Trofense 31%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.

xG, shots and style

CD Mafra has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.14. CD Mafra: 10.3 shots per match, CD Trofense: 7.7.

Match halves

CD Mafra: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.81. CD Trofense: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.41.

Goals by minute

CD Mafra: 76-90+ (11 goals). CD Trofense: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 3: 2.23 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I back a home win (1) because CD Mafra averages 1.5 goals per home match with 10.5 shots and 4.5 shots on target, whereas CD Trofense away averages only 1.08 goals with 7.38 shots and 3.38 shots on target. Mafra has a higher home xG: 1.39 versus Trofense’s 1.07 away xG, and a higher clean sheet rate 43% vs 38%, indicating superiority in chance quality and defensive stability. The visitors, however, defend effectively on the road — conceding only 0.77 goals per away match compared to the 1.14 conceded by Mafra at home — but have a high share of matches without scoring (38% vs 7% for the hosts). In the short term both teams show similar form: 1.2 points per match in the last 5 games and 2 wins in that period. Considering Mafra’s advantage in chance creation and conversion (10.5 vs 7.38 shots and 1.39 vs 1.07 xG) and the low percentage of goalless matches by the hosts, I estimate a 55% probability of a Mafra win, 25% for a draw and 20% for an away win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
CD MafraCD Trofense
16Shots6
CD MafraCD Trofense
7Shots on target2
CD MafraCD Trofense
1.71xG0.78
CD MafraCD Trofense
11Corners3
CD MafraCD Trofense
29Dangerous attacks35
CD MafraCD Trofense
-1Fouls-1
CD MafraCD Trofense
1Cards1
CD MafraCD Trofense

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CD MafraCD Trofense
1.41Goals scored / match0.94
CD MafraCD Trofense
1.34Goals conceded / match0.97
CD MafraCD Trofense
50%Average possession51%
CD MafraCD Trofense
4.5Shots on target / match3.19
CD MafraCD Trofense

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.28Shots per match7.72
CD MafraCD Trofense
4.5Shots on target3.19
CD MafraCD Trofense
13.7%Shot conversion12.1%
CD MafraCD Trofense
50%Possession51%
CD MafraCD Trofense
1.41xG for1.14
CD MafraCD Trofense
1.27xG against1.26
CD MafraCD Trofense

Shooting quality

CD Mafra: Efficient finishingCD Trofense: Balanced
CD MafraCD Trofense
Accuracy (shots on target)44%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

CD Mafra is 250% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - CD Mafra · 0.4 pts / match - CD Trofense

CD Mafra
LWWDL
Season result split
44% W28% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-9-9
1.59 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-4-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
CD Trofense
LLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
28% W34% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-11-12
1.19 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-6-4
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CD Mafra is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

1.41 goals / match - CD Mafra · 0.94 goals / match - CD Trofense

CD Trofense is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.34 goals / match - CD Mafra · 0.97 goals / match - CD Trofense

CD Mafra scoring profile: very strong

CD Mafra scores in 88% of matches (28 of 32 matches), while CD Trofense keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).

CD Trofense scoring profile: strong

CD Trofense scores in 56% of matches (18 of 32 matches), while CD Mafra keeps a clean sheet in 31% (10 of 32 matches).

45Goals scored (season)30
CD MafraCD Trofense
43Goals conceded (season)31
CD MafraCD Trofense
2.75Average goals in match1.91
CD MafraCD Trofense
8Goals scored (last 5)1
CD MafraCD Trofense
10Goals conceded (last 5)6
CD MafraCD Trofense

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal56%
CD MafraCD Trofense
38%2 goals22%
CD MafraCD Trofense
13%3 goals6%
CD MafraCD Trofense
3%4 goals6%
CD MafraCD Trofense

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal75%
CD MafraCD Trofense
34%2 goals19%
CD MafraCD Trofense
22%3 goals3%
CD MafraCD Trofense
9%4 goals0%
CD MafraCD Trofense

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time19%
CD MafraCD Trofense
6%BTTS in both halves3%
CD MafraCD Trofense
28%Scored in both halves16%
CD MafraCD Trofense

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS28%
CD MafraCD Trofense
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
CD MafraCD Trofense
60%BTTS - last 520%
CD MafraCD Trofense

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
CD MafraCD Trofense
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
CD MafraCD Trofense
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
CD MafraCD Trofense

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
CD MafraCD Trofense
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time19%
CD MafraCD Trofense
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
CD MafraCD Trofense

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CD Mafra is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - CD Mafra · 1.31 pts / match - CD Trofense

CD Mafra - half-time state
34% leading34% draw31% trailing
CD Trofense - half-time state
28% leading47% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1.31
CD MafraCD Trofense
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.53
CD MafraCD Trofense
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
CD MafraCD Trofense
1.13Average goals (1st half)1.03
CD MafraCD Trofense
59%Clean sheet before half-time56%
CD MafraCD Trofense
56%No goal before half-time59%
CD MafraCD Trofense

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per match (2nd half)1.06
CD MafraCD Trofense
0.81Goals scored (2nd half)0.41
CD MafraCD Trofense
0.81Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
CD MafraCD Trofense
1.63Average goals (2nd half)0.88
CD MafraCD Trofense
47%Clean sheet after half-time53%
CD MafraCD Trofense
28%No goal after half-time69%
CD MafraCD Trofense

CD Mafra - second-half results

34% W38% R28% P
44
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CD Trofense - second-half results

19% W50% R31% P
42
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CD Mafra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.21.8
Average goals in match0.82.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
CD Trofense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.40
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.80.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CD Mafra
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
5
3
16-30
8
8
31-45
8
7
46-60
7
10
61-75
11
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

CD Trofense
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
6
8
16-30
6
4
31-45
5
5
46-60
2
4
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.33
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-14%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CD Mafra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

CD Trofense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.79
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).

Teams vs league

CD MafraLigaCD Trofense
Average goals in match 2.752.23 1.91
Both teams scored 63%49% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%40% 31%
Clean sheets 31%31% 25%
Goal before half-time 69%66% 66%
Goal after half-time 81%74% 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.23
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.19
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: CD Mafra 0 - 1 - 0 CD Trofense. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of CD Mafra vs CD Trofense?

The Liga 3 match finished CD Mafra 1:0 CD Trofense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Mafra vs CD Trofense?

CD Mafra score 1.41 goals per game on average and CD Trofense 0.94. The Liga 3 average is 2.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 63% of CD Mafra's matches and 47% of CD Trofense's.

What form are CD Mafra and CD Trofense in?

Over the last 5 games CD Mafra have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and CD Trofense 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Mafra vs CD Trofense?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for CD Mafra vs CD Trofense: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.