El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 23 July 2026

CD Platense vs FAS: match statistics

CD Platense crest
CD Platense
2 : 3half-time 0:0
FAS crest
FAS
125%(3.53)
X30%(3.30)
245%(1.94)

FAS demonstrates decidedly better form, winning all of their last five matches and scoring 10 goals while conceding just 2. The visiting team has an impressive season record with 21 victories and only 5 defeats, whereas CD Platense has won just 7 matches with 13 losses. In away games, FAS achieves a 41% win rate and averages 1.88 goals per match, outperforming CD Platense at home (18% wins, 1.29 goals). FAS's positive goal difference on the road (+12) contrasts with the hosts' zero balance. Although CD Platense's high draw percentage at home (53%) suggests a potential split of points, the current form and quality of FAS argue for their victory. xG statistics also confirm the visitors' advantage (1.57 vs 1.32 for the hosts).

CD Platense vs FAS: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CD Platense play FAS in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match date is 7 March 2026 at 01:00. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

CD Platense: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. FAS: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

CD Platense scores 1.22 and concedes 1.43 goals per match. FAS scores 2.10 and concedes 0.92. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CD Platense 57%, FAS 52%. Over 2.5: CD Platense 41%, FAS 52%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

FAS has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.24. CD Platense: 8.5 shots per match, FAS: 11.0.

Match halves

CD Platense: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.70. FAS: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.12.

Goals by minute

CD Platense: 31-45+ (12 goals). FAS: 76-90+ (30 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-1-2. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 67%.

Match description

FAS demonstrates decidedly better form, winning all of their last five matches and scoring 10 goals while conceding just 2. The visiting team has an impressive season record with 21 victories and only 5 defeats, whereas CD Platense has won just 7 matches with 13 losses. In away games, FAS achieves a 41% win rate and averages 1.88 goals per match, outperforming CD Platense at home (18% wins, 1.29 goals). FAS's positive goal difference on the road (+12) contrasts with the hosts' zero balance. Although CD Platense's high draw percentage at home (53%) suggests a potential split of points, the current form and quality of FAS argue for their victory. xG statistics also confirm the visitors' advantage (1.57 vs 1.32 for the hosts).

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
CD PlatenseFAS
7Shots12
CD PlatenseFAS
3Shots on target6
CD PlatenseFAS
0.9xG1.48
CD PlatenseFAS
0Corners10
CD PlatenseFAS
32Dangerous attacks40
CD PlatenseFAS
-1Fouls-1
CD PlatenseFAS
-1Cards-1
CD PlatenseFAS

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.22Goals scored / match2.1
CD PlatenseFAS
1.43Goals conceded / match0.92
CD PlatenseFAS
48%Average possession53%
CD PlatenseFAS
3.72Shots on target / match5
CD PlatenseFAS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.48Shots per match11
CD PlatenseFAS
3.72Shots on target5
CD PlatenseFAS
14.4%Shot conversion19.1%
CD PlatenseFAS
48%Possession53%
CD PlatenseFAS
1.24xG for1.53
CD PlatenseFAS
1.33xG against1.2
CD PlatenseFAS

Shooting quality

CD Platense: Efficient finishingFAS: Efficient finishing
CD PlatenseFAS
Accuracy (shots on target)44%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FAS is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - CD Platense · 1.6 pts / match - FAS

CD Platense
LDWDL
Season result split
20% W41% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-19-18
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-11-8
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%
FAS
DDLWW
Season result split
62% W25% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
32-13-7
2.10 pts / match · goal difference +61
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
12-10-5
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DDDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FAS is 72% better for: goals scored per match.

1.22 goals / match - CD Platense · 2.1 goals / match - FAS

FAS is 55% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.43 goals / match - CD Platense · 0.92 goals / match - FAS

CD Platense scoring profile: strong

CD Platense scores in 67% of matches (31 of 46 matches), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 38% (20 of 52 matches).

FAS scoring profile: very strong

FAS scores in 88% of matches (46 of 52 matches), while CD Platense keeps a clean sheet in 22% (10 of 46 matches).

56Goals scored (season)109
CD PlatenseFAS
66Goals conceded (season)48
CD PlatenseFAS
2.65Average goals in match3.02
CD PlatenseFAS
4Goals scored (last 5)7
CD PlatenseFAS
4Goals conceded (last 5)3
CD PlatenseFAS

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal88%
CD PlatenseFAS
33%2 goals62%
CD PlatenseFAS
17%3 goals37%
CD PlatenseFAS
4%4 goals12%
CD PlatenseFAS

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal62%
CD PlatenseFAS
35%2 goals23%
CD PlatenseFAS
20%3 goals8%
CD PlatenseFAS
7%4 goals0%
CD PlatenseFAS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time19%
CD PlatenseFAS
7%BTTS in both halves6%
CD PlatenseFAS
15%Scored in both halves46%
CD PlatenseFAS

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
CD PlatenseFAS
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
CD PlatenseFAS
40%BTTS - last 540%
CD PlatenseFAS

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
CD PlatenseFAS
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
CD PlatenseFAS
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
CD PlatenseFAS

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
CD PlatenseFAS
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
CD PlatenseFAS
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
CD PlatenseFAS

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FAS is 53% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / match - CD Platense · 1.73 pts / match - FAS

CD Platense - half-time state
22% leading48% draw30% trailing
FAS - half-time state
44% leading40% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per match (1st half)1.73
CD PlatenseFAS
0.52Goals scored (1st half)0.96
CD PlatenseFAS
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
CD PlatenseFAS
1.11Average goals (1st half)1.37
CD PlatenseFAS
52%Clean sheet before half-time67%
CD PlatenseFAS
63%No goal before half-time38%
CD PlatenseFAS

After half-time (2nd half)

0.98Points per match (2nd half)1.83
CD PlatenseFAS
0.7Goals scored (2nd half)1.12
CD PlatenseFAS
0.85Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
CD PlatenseFAS
1.54Average goals (2nd half)1.62
CD PlatenseFAS
46%Clean sheet after half-time60%
CD PlatenseFAS
54%No goal after half-time29%
CD PlatenseFAS

CD Platense - second-half results

17% W46% R37% P
52
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding91%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 20%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FAS - second-half results

50% W33% R17% P
90
Half-time points
50
Half-time goals
+29
Goal difference (1st half)
95
Second-half points
+32
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CD Platense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
FAS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.00
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+5-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CD Platense
ScoredConceded
6
9
0-15
6
7
16-30
12
11
31-45
10
10
46-60
12
14
61-75
10
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

FAS
ScoredConceded
18
4
0-15
17
5
16-30
16
13
31-45
11
10
46-60
17
6
61-75
30
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (30 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +20 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+41%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CD Platense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

FAS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.85
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-21.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.57
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
159%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
69%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

CD PlatenseLigaFAS
Average goals in match 2.652.67 3.02
Both teams scored 57%53% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 41%50% 52%
Clean sheets 22%27% 38%
Goal before half-time 67%68% 75%
Goal after half-time 72%78% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): CD Platense 0 - 1 - 2 FAS. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.

FAS
1 : 0
CD Platense
FAS
4 : 1
CD Platense
CD Platense
3 : 3
FAS

FAQ

What was the result of CD Platense vs FAS?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished CD Platense 2:3 FAS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between CD Platense and FAS?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches CD Platense won 0, FAS won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Platense vs FAS?

CD Platense score 1.22 goals per game on average and FAS 2.10. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 57% of CD Platense's matches and 52% of FAS's.

What form are CD Platense and FAS in?

Over the last 5 games CD Platense have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and FAS 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Platense vs FAS?

The statistical background for CD Platense vs FAS — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.