El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónComplejo Deportivo Tierra de JuegoData current as of 06 September 2026

CD Platense vs FAS: match statistics

CD Platense crest
CD Platense
2 : 1half-time 0:0
FAS crest
FAS

CD Platense vs FAS: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CD Platense played FAS in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 17 August 2026. Venue: Complejo Deportivo Tierra de Juego. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

CD Platense: 1-2-0, 1.67 points/match. FAS: 2-1-1, 1.75 points/match.

Goal statistics

CD Platense scores 1.33 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. FAS scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.41 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CD Platense 67%, FAS 50%. Over 2.5: CD Platense 0%, FAS 50%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 37%.

xG, shots and style

FAS has higher xG: 1.91 vs 1.32. CD Platense: 7.3 shots per match, FAS: 13.0.

Match halves

CD Platense: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67. FAS: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.25.

Goals by minute

CD Platense: 0-15 (1 goals). FAS: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.41 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 37%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-3. Average goals 4.25, BTTS 75%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

CD Platense have a clear home advantage: they won their only home match so far, scoring 2 goals and conceding none. The hosts create chances worth an average of 2.00 xG from 14 shots, including 6 on target, while FAS allow opponents 1.59 xG away from home. FAS also score an average of 2 goals on the road, with a conversion rate of 19%, but failed to score in 50% of their away matches. Platense’s defence looks more solid, recording a 100% clean-sheet rate at home and conceding an average of 0 goals, whereas the visitors concede 1 goal on average. However, both teams’ last five matches have been inconsistent, so the hosts’ advantage is moderate and a draw remains a realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Platense have averaged 2.0 goals in their league matches so far and have kept no clean sheets, while their BTTS rate stands at 100%. FAS have also averaged 2.0 goals, and their high shooting accuracy of 19% along with 10.5 shots on target per match support the visitors’ chances of scoring. In their last five matches, the hosts recorded BTTS in 60% of cases, compared with 40% for FAS, with average xG figures of 1.35 and 1.72 respectively, which still indicates attacking potential from both sides. The main risk to the pick is FAS’s 50% clean-sheet rate and the absence of BTTS in their matches so far this season. However, Platense’s defensive inefficiency and xG conceded of 1.28 favour a goal for the visitors. A Goal/Goal scenario is therefore marginally more likely than BTTS - No, meaning that at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The 2.45-goal projection is moderate, as Platense averaged 1.0 goals scored and 0.8 conceded in their last five matches, while FAS scored 1.6 goals and conceded 1.0. Platense recorded no matches with at least three goals during this period, whereas this outcome occurred in 40% of FAS matches. The xG figures from the last five appearances—1.35 for the home side and 1.72 for the visitors—indicate chances at both ends but do not suggest regular four-goal games. Additionally, the league average of 2.59 goals and only 41% of matches finishing Over 2.5 goals support a controlled-score scenario. The strongest option is Under 3.5 goals, as even with FAS scoring efficiently, the line allows room for results such as 1:1, 1:2, or 2:1.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a FAS victory at the final whistle, as both teams were level after 45 minutes in 40% of their last five matches. Platense does have the better first-half record in this sample, averaging 0.6 goals scored and 0.4 conceded, but FAS has shown greater potential after the break, averaging 1.0 goals scored compared with the hosts’ 0.4. The visitors have also been more effective across their last five matches overall, scoring 1.6 goals per game versus Platense’s 1.0, while their average number of goals conceded stands at 1.0 compared with 0.8 for the hosts. FAS’s advantage in shots on target in the season data, 10.5 to 6.0, together with their superior shot conversion rate, 19% to 13%, supports a scenario in which an even start develops into a lead for the visitors. Platense remains dangerous at home, so home-win scenarios retain a significant probability, but FAS’s attacking form after half-time provides the strongest support for the X/2 pick.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
CD PlatenseFAS
9Shots12
CD PlatenseFAS
10Shots on target13
CD PlatenseFAS
1.62xG2.11
CD PlatenseFAS
7Corners9
CD PlatenseFAS
48Dangerous attacks59
CD PlatenseFAS
-1Fouls-1
CD PlatenseFAS
-1Cards-1
CD PlatenseFAS

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.33Goals scored / match2
CD PlatenseFAS
0.67Goals conceded / match1
CD PlatenseFAS
51%Average possession56%
CD PlatenseFAS
3Shots on target / match8.25
CD PlatenseFAS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.33Shots per match13
CD PlatenseFAS
3Shots on target8.25
CD PlatenseFAS
18.2%Shot conversion15.4%
CD PlatenseFAS
51%Possession56%
CD PlatenseFAS
1.32xG for1.91
CD PlatenseFAS
1.31xG against1.43
CD PlatenseFAS

Shooting quality

CD Platense: Efficient finishingFAS: Efficient finishing
CD PlatenseFAS
Accuracy (shots on target)41%63%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FAS is 5% better for: last-5 form.

1.67 pts / match - CD Platense · 1.75 pts / match - FAS

CD Platense
DDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W67% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-0
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-0
1.67 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.3Goals conceded: 0.7xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 0%
FAS
WLWD
Season result split
50% W25% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 away
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.91Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FAS is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - CD Platense · 2 goals / match - FAS

CD Platense is 49% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.67 goals / match - CD Platense · 1 goals / match - FAS

CD Platense scoring profile: very strong

CD Platense scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

FAS scoring profile: strong

FAS scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while CD Platense keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

4Goals scored (season)8
CD PlatenseFAS
2Goals conceded (season)4
CD PlatenseFAS
2Average goals in match3
CD PlatenseFAS
4Goals scored (last 5)8
CD PlatenseFAS
2Goals conceded (last 5)4
CD PlatenseFAS

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal75%
CD PlatenseFAS
33%2 goals50%
CD PlatenseFAS
0%3 goals50%
CD PlatenseFAS
0%4 goals25%
CD PlatenseFAS

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal75%
CD PlatenseFAS
0%2 goals25%
CD PlatenseFAS
0%3 goals0%
CD PlatenseFAS
0%4 goals0%
CD PlatenseFAS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time25%
CD PlatenseFAS
0%BTTS in both halves0%
CD PlatenseFAS
33%Scored in both halves25%
CD PlatenseFAS

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
CD PlatenseFAS
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
CD PlatenseFAS
67%BTTS - last 550%
CD PlatenseFAS

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
CD PlatenseFAS
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time75%
CD PlatenseFAS
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
CD PlatenseFAS

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
CD PlatenseFAS
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
CD PlatenseFAS
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
CD PlatenseFAS

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CD Platense is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / match - CD Platense · 1 pts / match - FAS

CD Platense - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing
FAS - half-time state
25% leading25% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)1
CD PlatenseFAS
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.75
CD PlatenseFAS
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)1
CD PlatenseFAS
1.33Average goals (1st half)1.75
CD PlatenseFAS
33%Clean sheet before half-time25%
CD PlatenseFAS
33%No goal before half-time50%
CD PlatenseFAS

After half-time (2nd half)

2.33Points per match (2nd half)2
CD PlatenseFAS
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)1.25
CD PlatenseFAS
0Goals conceded (2nd half)0
CD PlatenseFAS
0.67Average goals (2nd half)1.25
CD PlatenseFAS
100%Clean sheet after half-time100%
CD PlatenseFAS
33%No goal after half-time50%
CD PlatenseFAS

CD Platense - second-half results

67% W33% R0% P
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.7

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FAS - second-half results

50% W50% R0% P
4
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-1.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CD Platense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.332.33
Goals scored / match0.70.7
Goals conceded / match0.70.0
Average goals in match1.30.7
1 goal100%67%
2 goals33%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet33%100%
No goal33%33%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 33% leading - 33% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 67% won - 33% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 2
FAS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.81.3
Goals conceded / match1.00.0
Average goals in match1.81.3
1 goal100%50%
2 goals75%50%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet25%100%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference-1+5
Half-time: 25% leading - 25% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CD Platense
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

FAS
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
4
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+70%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CD Platense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.65
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.64
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

FAS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
192%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

CD PlatenseLigaFAS
Average goals in match 2.002.41 3.00
Both teams scored 67%44% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 0%37% 50%
Clean sheets 33%39% 25%
Goal before half-time 100%63% 100%
Goal after half-time 67%59% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.41
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Rudy Geovanny Clavel Mendoza⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

Rafael Tejada⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FASGoalRafael Tejada
  2. CD PlatenseGoalRudy Geovanny Clavel Mendoza

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): CD Platense 0 - 1 - 3 FAS. Average goals 4.25, both teams scored in 75% matches.

FAS
1 : 0
CD Platense
CD Platense
2 : 3
FAS
FAS
4 : 1
CD Platense
CD Platense
3 : 3
FAS

FAQ

What was the result of CD Platense vs FAS?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished CD Platense 2:1 FAS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between CD Platense and FAS?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches CD Platense won 0, FAS won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Platense vs FAS?

CD Platense score 1.33 goals per game on average and FAS 2.00. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.41 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 67% of CD Platense's matches and 50% of FAS's.

What form are CD Platense and FAS in?

Over the last 5 games CD Platense have a 1-2-0 record (1.67 points per game) and FAS 2-1-1 (1.75 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Platense vs FAS?

The statistical background for CD Platense vs FAS — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.