El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 07 September 2026

CD Platense vs Inter: match statistics

CD Platense crest
CD Platense
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Inter crest
Inter

CD Platense vs Inter: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CD Platense played Inter in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 1 April 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

CD Platense: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Inter: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

CD Platense scores 1.31 and concedes 1.56 goals per match. Inter scores 1.11 and concedes 1.44. League average: 2.74 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CD Platense 59%, Inter 50%. Over 2.5: CD Platense 49%, Inter 53%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Inter has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.22. CD Platense: 8.1 shots per match, Inter: 7.7.

Match halves

CD Platense: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.72. Inter: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.64.

Goals by minute

CD Platense: 31-45+ (11 goals). Inter: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.74 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-3-0. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I expect a draw because the metrics indicate a very balanced match: Platense at home averages 1.35 goals scored and concedes 1.40, while Inter away scores 1.12 and concedes 1.82. Quality of chances is also similar — home xG for Platense is 1.31 versus 1.26 for Inter, with xG against of 1.33 vs 1.50, giving Platense a slight edge in chance creation. Platense has a high home draw rate (45%) and is less likely to finish goalless (20%), whereas Inter win only 18% of away matches and failed to score in 41% of games, which reduces the visitors’ offensive potential. In short-term form Platense over the last 5 matches is 1-1-3 (8 scored, 11 conceded, 0.8 points per game), and Inter 2-1-2 (3 scored, 8 conceded, 1.4 points per game), suggesting better point return for Inter but poorer goal output. Considering the higher home draw share, similar xG (1.31 vs 1.26) and moderate average total goals home and away (2.75 and 2.94), the most probable scenario is a points split.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS metrics are similar: Platense has BTTS 47%, Inter 53%, and the league average BTTS is 55%, which provides moderate support for a both-teams-to-score scenario. However, the last 5 matches show a large disparity: Platense has BTTS 60% while Inter has 0% and scored only 3 goals in those five matches (0.6 per game). Inter fails to score in 41% of season matches and concedes 1.82 goals per game on average, and Platense concedes 2.2 goals on average in the last 5 matches (11 in total), suggesting the risk of one side failing to reply is real. In terms of chance quality Platense has xG_for 1.23 while Inter xG_against is 1.50; both teams produce a similar number of shots on target (3.47 vs 3.71) but Inter has recently been poor at finishing. Therefore the strongest signal is to back 'No' (No BTTS) with an estimated probability of 60% versus 40% for 'Yes' (BTTS - Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have a high share of matches over 1.5 goals this season: Platense 74% and Inter 76%, so I assess the chance for Over 1.5 at around 75%. An xG-based model gives 1.37 xG for Platense (1.23 attack vs 1.50 opponent defense) and 1.14 xG for Inter (1.26 attack vs 1.02 Platense defense), total expected goals 2.51. The 2.5 line gives mixed signals: Platense has 37% of matches >2.5, Inter 71% — their arithmetic mean is 54%, so I forecast a moderate 55% for Over 2.5, although a Poisson model for 2.51 goals yields P(≥3) of about 46%. Over 3.5 is less likely (seasonal 21% for Platense and 47% for Inter), hence I project 33% for Over 3.5 and 67% for Under 3.5. The strongest play is Over 1.5 (side: over, line: 1.5) — both teams regularly clear this threshold and we have 2.51 expected goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Half-time statistics indicate a high incidence of draws: the home side were level at the break in 10 matches (53%), and the away side in 9 matches (53%), therefore an HT draw is most likely. The hosts kept a clean sheet at half-time in 74% of matches and averaged 0.53 goals scored by half-time with 0.26 conceded, whereas the visitors averaged 0.41 goals and conceded 1.00 by the break, supporting a low-scoring first half (e.g. 0-0). After half-time the probability of a home win increases: the hosts earned an average of 1.47 points after the break versus 0.88 for the visitors and have a better season points average 1.32 versus 0.82, while opponents concede on average 1.82 goals per match, so I expect the hosts to turn the game around in the second half. Both teams’ xG are similar (1.23 for the hosts vs 1.26 for the visitors), but the visitors have a higher xG against (1.50) and register slightly more on-target shots (3.71 vs 3.47), indicating the visitors’ weaker defence. Consequently, given the 53% chance of a draw at half-time, the robust 74% of home clean sheets at half-time and the opponents’ weaker defence (1.82 conceded), the most probable scenario is a Half-Time draw and a home win at Full-Time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
CD PlatenseInter
14Shots8
CD PlatenseInter
4Shots on target2
CD PlatenseInter
1.46xG0.88
CD PlatenseInter
4Corners2
CD PlatenseInter
41Dangerous attacks32
CD PlatenseInter
-1Fouls-1
CD PlatenseInter
-1Cards-1
CD PlatenseInter

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.31Goals scored / match1.11
CD PlatenseInter
1.56Goals conceded / match1.44
CD PlatenseInter
47%Average possession53%
CD PlatenseInter
3.64Shots on target / match3.58
CD PlatenseInter

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.05Shots per match7.69
CD PlatenseInter
3.64Shots on target3.58
CD PlatenseInter
16.2%Shot conversion14.4%
CD PlatenseInter
47%Possession53%
CD PlatenseInter
1.22xG for1.25
CD PlatenseInter
1.35xG against1.25
CD PlatenseInter

Shooting quality

CD Platense: Counter-attackingInter: Efficient finishing
CD PlatenseInter
Accuracy (shots on target)45%47%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Inter is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - CD Platense · 1.4 pts / match - Inter

CD Platense
LWLLD
Season result split
21% W38% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-15-16
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-9-7
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Inter
WWDLL
Season result split
25% W33% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-12-15
1.08 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-9
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CD Platense is 18% better for: goals scored per match.

1.31 goals / match - CD Platense · 1.11 goals / match - Inter

Inter is 8% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.56 goals / match - CD Platense · 1.44 goals / match - Inter

CD Platense scoring profile: strong

CD Platense scores in 69% of matches (27 of 39 matches), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 28% (10 of 36 matches).

Inter scoring profile: strong

Inter scores in 64% of matches (23 of 36 matches), while CD Platense keeps a clean sheet in 21% (8 of 39 matches).

51Goals scored (season)40
CD PlatenseInter
61Goals conceded (season)52
CD PlatenseInter
2.87Average goals in match2.56
CD PlatenseInter
8Goals scored (last 5)3
CD PlatenseInter
11Goals conceded (last 5)8
CD PlatenseInter

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal64%
CD PlatenseInter
36%2 goals36%
CD PlatenseInter
21%3 goals11%
CD PlatenseInter
5%4 goals0%
CD PlatenseInter

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal72%
CD PlatenseInter
41%2 goals47%
CD PlatenseInter
23%3 goals19%
CD PlatenseInter
8%4 goals3%
CD PlatenseInter

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time19%
CD PlatenseInter
8%BTTS in both halves6%
CD PlatenseInter
18%Scored in both halves17%
CD PlatenseInter

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
CD PlatenseInter
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
CD PlatenseInter
60%BTTS - last 50%
CD PlatenseInter

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

72%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
CD PlatenseInter
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
CD PlatenseInter
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
CD PlatenseInter

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
CD PlatenseInter
51%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
CD PlatenseInter
28%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
CD PlatenseInter

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CD Platense - half-time state
23% leading46% draw31% trailing
Inter - half-time state
22% leading53% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.15Points per match (1st half)1.19
CD PlatenseInter
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.47
CD PlatenseInter
0.64Goals conceded (1st half)0.61
CD PlatenseInter
1.23Average goals (1st half)1.08
CD PlatenseInter
49%Clean sheet before half-time58%
CD PlatenseInter
59%No goal before half-time64%
CD PlatenseInter

After half-time (2nd half)

0.92Points per match (2nd half)1.19
CD PlatenseInter
0.72Goals scored (2nd half)0.64
CD PlatenseInter
0.92Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
CD PlatenseInter
1.64Average goals (2nd half)1.47
CD PlatenseInter
44%Clean sheet after half-time44%
CD PlatenseInter
54%No goal after half-time56%
CD PlatenseInter

CD Platense - second-half results

15% W46% R38% P
45
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding91%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 21%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Inter - second-half results

31% W28% R42% P
43
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CD Platense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.4
Average goals in match1.42.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Inter - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CD Platense
ScoredConceded
6
8
0-15
6
7
16-30
11
10
31-45
8
9
46-60
11
13
61-75
9
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Inter
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
1
10
16-30
10
8
31-45
10
7
46-60
5
9
61-75
8
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.71
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CD Platense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Inter

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

CD PlatenseLigaInter
Average goals in match 2.872.74 2.56
Both teams scored 59%55% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 49%53% 53%
Clean sheets 21%27% 28%
Goal before half-time 72%68% 58%
Goal after half-time 72%78% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.74
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Jaime Alfredo HerreraMatches officiated: 14
-Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 236%Home wins28%Draws36%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): CD Platense 0 - 3 - 0 Inter. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Inter
0 : 0
CD Platense
CD Platense
2 : 2
Inter
Inter
2 : 2
CD Platense

FAQ

What was the result of CD Platense vs Inter?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished CD Platense 0:0 Inter. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between CD Platense and Inter?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches CD Platense won 0, Inter won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Platense vs Inter?

CD Platense score 1.31 goals per game on average and Inter 1.11. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 59% of CD Platense's matches and 50% of Inter's.

What form are CD Platense and Inter in?

Over the last 5 games CD Platense have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Inter 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Platense vs Inter?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for CD Platense vs Inter: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.