El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 07 September 2026

Inter vs CD Platense: match statistics

Inter crest
Inter
0 : 0half-time 0:0
CD Platense crest
CD Platense
150%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
220%(0.00)

Inter shows a clear advantage in recent form, earning 2 points per game in the last 5 matches and recording a streak of 3 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss. CD Platense is experiencing a form crisis with just 0.6 points per game and a record of 1 win and 4 losses in their last 5 matches. The hosts have a better goal difference at home (-1) compared to the visitors away (-9), as well as higher possession (54% vs 46%). CD Platense fails to score in 43% of away matches and concedes an average of 1.79 goals per match, which, given their poor form, makes them very vulnerable to defeat. Considering all statistics, Inter has solid chances for a victory, although their own instability in home matches (only 23% win rate) suggests that a draw is also possible.

Inter vs CD Platense: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Inter played CD Platense in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 4 February 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Inter: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. CD Platense: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Inter scores 1.16 and concedes 1.48 goals per match. CD Platense scores 1.29 and concedes 1.57. League average: 2.74 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Inter 60%, CD Platense 61%. Over 2.5: Inter 52%, CD Platense 50%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

CD Platense has higher xG: 1.21 vs 1.20. Inter: 7.0 shots per match, CD Platense: 8.2.

Match halves

Inter: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.68. CD Platense: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.68.

Goals by minute

Inter: 46-60 (9 goals). CD Platense: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.74 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Inter shows a clear advantage in recent form, earning 2 points per game in the last 5 matches and recording a streak of 3 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss. CD Platense is experiencing a form crisis with just 0.6 points per game and a record of 1 win and 4 losses in their last 5 matches. The hosts have a better goal difference at home (-1) compared to the visitors away (-9), as well as higher possession (54% vs 46%). CD Platense fails to score in 43% of away matches and concedes an average of 1.79 goals per match, which, given their poor form, makes them very vulnerable to defeat. Considering all statistics, Inter has solid chances for a victory, although their own instability in home matches (only 23% win rate) suggests that a draw is also possible.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

70Possession (%)30
InterCD Platense
15Shots6
InterCD Platense
4Shots on target2
InterCD Platense
1.71xG0.72
InterCD Platense
10Corners3
InterCD Platense
67Dangerous attacks28
InterCD Platense
20Fouls12
InterCD Platense
0Cards0
InterCD Platense

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.16Goals scored / match1.29
InterCD Platense
1.48Goals conceded / match1.57
InterCD Platense
52%Average possession47%
InterCD Platense
3.48Shots on target / match3.68
InterCD Platense

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7Shots per match8.21
InterCD Platense
3.48Shots on target3.68
InterCD Platense
16.6%Shot conversion15.7%
InterCD Platense
52%Possession47%
InterCD Platense
1.2xG for1.21
InterCD Platense
1.23xG against1.33
InterCD Platense

Shooting quality

Inter: Efficient finishingCD Platense: Counter-attacking
InterCD Platense
Accuracy (shots on target)50%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Inter is 233% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Inter · 0.6 pts / match - CD Platense

Inter
LWWWD
Season result split
20% W40% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-10-10
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-6-4
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DLDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
CD Platense
LLWLL
Season result split
21% W39% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-11-11
1.04 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-4-7
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CD Platense is 11% better for: goals scored per match.

1.16 goals / match - Inter · 1.29 goals / match - CD Platense

Inter is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.48 goals / match - Inter · 1.57 goals / match - CD Platense

Inter scoring profile: very strong

Inter scores in 68% of matches (17 of 25 matches), while CD Platense keeps a clean sheet in 18% (5 of 28 matches).

CD Platense scoring profile: very strong

CD Platense scores in 68% of matches (19 of 28 matches), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 20% (5 of 25 matches).

29Goals scored (season)36
InterCD Platense
37Goals conceded (season)44
InterCD Platense
2.64Average goals in match2.86
InterCD Platense
9Goals scored (last 5)6
InterCD Platense
5Goals conceded (last 5)15
InterCD Platense

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal68%
InterCD Platense
40%2 goals36%
InterCD Platense
8%3 goals21%
InterCD Platense
0%4 goals4%
InterCD Platense

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal82%
InterCD Platense
52%2 goals39%
InterCD Platense
16%3 goals18%
InterCD Platense
0%4 goals11%
InterCD Platense

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time21%
InterCD Platense
8%BTTS in both halves7%
InterCD Platense
16%Scored in both halves14%
InterCD Platense

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
InterCD Platense
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
InterCD Platense
60%BTTS - last 560%
InterCD Platense

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
InterCD Platense
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
InterCD Platense
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
InterCD Platense

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
InterCD Platense
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time54%
InterCD Platense
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
InterCD Platense

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Inter - half-time state
20% leading52% draw28% trailing
CD Platense - half-time state
21% leading50% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.12Points per match (1st half)1.14
InterCD Platense
0.48Goals scored (1st half)0.61
InterCD Platense
0.64Goals conceded (1st half)0.64
InterCD Platense
1.12Average goals (1st half)1.25
InterCD Platense
52%Clean sheet before half-time50%
InterCD Platense
60%No goal before half-time61%
InterCD Platense

After half-time (2nd half)

1.24Points per match (2nd half)0.93
InterCD Platense
0.68Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
InterCD Platense
0.84Goals conceded (2nd half)0.93
InterCD Platense
1.52Average goals (2nd half)1.61
InterCD Platense
40%Clean sheet after half-time43%
InterCD Platense
56%No goal after half-time57%
InterCD Platense

Inter - second-half results

32% W28% R40% P
28
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.12
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CD Platense - second-half results

14% W50% R36% P
32
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Inter - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
CD Platense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.00
Goals scored / match1.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.82.2
Average goals in match1.82.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Inter
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
1
7
16-30
8
7
31-45
9
5
46-60
2
7
61-75
6
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

CD Platense
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
6
6
16-30
8
7
31-45
6
6
46-60
7
10
61-75
6
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+45%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Inter

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

CD Platense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

InterLigaCD Platense
Average goals in match 2.642.74 2.86
Both teams scored 60%57% 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%53% 50%
Clean sheets 20%26% 18%
Goal before half-time 64%69% 68%
Goal after half-time 80%77% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.74
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Filiberto MartinezMatches officiated: 12
-Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 242%Home wins33%Draws25%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Inter 0 - 2 - 0 CD Platense. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

CD Platense
2 : 2
Inter
Inter
2 : 2
CD Platense

FAQ

What was the result of Inter vs CD Platense?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Inter 0:0 CD Platense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Inter and CD Platense?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Inter won 0, CD Platense won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Inter vs CD Platense?

Inter score 1.16 goals per game on average and CD Platense 1.29. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Inter's matches and 61% of CD Platense's.

What form are Inter and CD Platense in?

Over the last 5 games Inter have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and CD Platense 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter vs CD Platense?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Inter vs CD Platense: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.