Portugal - LigaProEstádio João CardosoData current as of 17 October 2026

CD Tondela vs Porto II: match statistics

CD Tondela crest
CD Tondela
3 : 0half-time 1:0
Porto II crest
Porto II

CD Tondela vs Porto II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CD Tondela played Porto II in LigaPro (Portugal). The match was played on 5 September 2026. Venue: Estádio João Cardoso. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

CD Tondela: 1-0-3, 0.75 points/match. Porto II: 1-0-3, 0.75 points/match.

Goal statistics

CD Tondela scores 0.50 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Porto II scores 0.50 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.22 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CD Tondela 25%, Porto II 25%. Over 2.5: CD Tondela 25%, Porto II 50%. League level: BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 36%.

xG, shots and style

CD Tondela has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.25. CD Tondela: 11.5 shots per match, Porto II: 11.0.

Match halves

CD Tondela: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.00. Porto II: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

CD Tondela: 16-30 (1 goals). Porto II: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

LigaPro: 2.22 goals per match, BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 36%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

CD Tondela have a slight home advantage: they average 1.0 goals per home game with an xG of 1.17, while Porto II score just 0.5 goals per away match. The hosts also create more chances, averaging 10.5 shots compared with 9, and their xGA stands at 1.25, significantly lower than the 1.65 conceded by Porto II. However, both teams are defensively inconsistent, with Tondela yet to keep a clean sheet at home and having conceded 9 goals in their last five matches. Porto II arrive on a slightly better run of results, with 2 wins in their last 5 games compared with Tondela’s 1, but the visitors have failed to score in 50% of their away matches. The low attacking efficiency of both teams and their similar home-away records increase the likelihood of a draw, although Tondela’s superior chance creation points towards a narrow home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for BTTS - No is clear, as Porto II recorded BTTS in only 0% of their matches so far, while the figures from the teams’ last five games stand at just 40% for Tondela and 20% for the visitors. Both teams average only 0.5 goals per game this season, with their averages over the last five rounds standing at 0.6 and 0.8 goals, respectively. Porto II kept a clean sheet in 50% of their matches, while Tondela failed to score in 50% of their appearances, which significantly limits the hosts’ chances of finding the net. Tondela does create more, with an average xG of 1.49 compared with Porto II’s 1.02, but their low efficiency—just 4% shot conversion—reduces the weight of this argument. The league has a BTTS rate of only 39% and averages 2.22 goals per match, making the scenario in which at least one team fails to score more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The forecast of approximately 2.50 goals is based on the latest xG figures: Tondela averaged 1.27, while Porto II averaged 1.18, with 1.29 and 1.72 xG conceded by these teams, respectively. In their last five matches, both teams recorded at least three goals in 40% of games, which does not provide a strong basis for expecting a high-scoring game. Porto II kept a clean sheet in 50% of its matches so far, while only 20% of its last five games ended with both teams scoring. The Under 3.5 line also has an advantage because neither team has exceeded four goals in a match in the current season data, and the league average is just 2.22 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Porto II have a clearly superior record in previous matches under this HT/FT scenario: they average 1.5 points per game, while Tondela have yet to earn a point and have lost 100% of their matches. The hosts concede as many as 3.0 goals per game, compared with just 1.0 for Porto II, who have also kept a clean sheet in 50% of their matches. Tondela have never been ahead at Half-Time, whereas Porto II were leading at the break in 50% of their games, supporting the away-side lead at half-time scenario. In their last five appearances, Porto II won 40% of their matches compared with Tondela’s 20%, while the hosts score just 0.2 goals after the break and concede 1.2. Although Tondela record a slightly higher average xG, 1.49 compared with 1.02, their extremely poor defence and losing streak primarily point to a Porto II lead at the break followed by an away win at full-time: 2/2.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
CD TondelaPorto II
17Shots1
CD TondelaPorto II
8Shots on target1
CD TondelaPorto II
2.03xG0.48
CD TondelaPorto II
6Corners3
CD TondelaPorto II
57Dangerous attacks47
CD TondelaPorto II
22Fouls16
CD TondelaPorto II
4Cards4
CD TondelaPorto II

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CD TondelaPorto II
0.5Goals scored / match0.5
CD TondelaPorto II
1.5Goals conceded / match2
CD TondelaPorto II
53%Average possession52%
CD TondelaPorto II
2Shots on target / match3.25
CD TondelaPorto II

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.5Shots per match11
CD TondelaPorto II
2Shots on target3.25
CD TondelaPorto II
4.3%Shot conversion4.5%
CD TondelaPorto II
53%Possession52%
CD TondelaPorto II
1.3xG for1.25
CD TondelaPorto II
1.25xG against1.84
CD TondelaPorto II

Shooting quality

CD Tondela: BalancedPorto II: Balanced
CD TondelaPorto II
Accuracy (shots on target)17%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.15

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

CD Tondela
WLLL
Season result split
25% W0% D75% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-3
0.75 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-3
0.75 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 25%
Porto II
LLWL
Season result split
25% W0% D75% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-3
0.75 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-3
0.75 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 away
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.84BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 50%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CD Tondela is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - CD Tondela · 2 goals / match - Porto II

CD Tondela scoring profile: mixed

CD Tondela scores in 25% of matches (1 of 4 matches), while Porto II keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

Porto II scoring profile: very strong

Porto II scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while CD Tondela keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).

2Goals scored (season)2
CD TondelaPorto II
6Goals conceded (season)8
CD TondelaPorto II
2Average goals in match2.5
CD TondelaPorto II
2Goals scored (last 5)2
CD TondelaPorto II
6Goals conceded (last 5)8
CD TondelaPorto II

How often they score at least...

25%1 goal50%
CD TondelaPorto II
25%2 goals0%
CD TondelaPorto II
0%3 goals0%
CD TondelaPorto II
0%4 goals0%
CD TondelaPorto II

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal75%
CD TondelaPorto II
50%2 goals75%
CD TondelaPorto II
0%3 goals50%
CD TondelaPorto II
0%4 goals0%
CD TondelaPorto II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time25%
CD TondelaPorto II
0%BTTS in both halves0%
CD TondelaPorto II
0%Scored in both halves0%
CD TondelaPorto II

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
CD TondelaPorto II
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
CD TondelaPorto II
25%BTTS - last 525%
CD TondelaPorto II

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
CD TondelaPorto II
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
CD TondelaPorto II
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
CD TondelaPorto II

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
CD TondelaPorto II
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
CD TondelaPorto II
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
CD TondelaPorto II

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CD Tondela is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / match - CD Tondela · 1 pts / match - Porto II

CD Tondela - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing
Porto II - half-time state
25% leading25% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per match (1st half)1
CD TondelaPorto II
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.5
CD TondelaPorto II
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)1
CD TondelaPorto II
1Average goals (1st half)1.5
CD TondelaPorto II
50%Clean sheet before half-time25%
CD TondelaPorto II
75%No goal before half-time50%
CD TondelaPorto II

After half-time (2nd half)

0.25Points per match (2nd half)0.25
CD TondelaPorto II
0Goals scored (2nd half)0
CD TondelaPorto II
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1
CD TondelaPorto II
1Average goals (2nd half)1
CD TondelaPorto II
25%Clean sheet after half-time25%
CD TondelaPorto II
100%No goal after half-time100%
CD TondelaPorto II

CD Tondela - second-half results

0% W25% D75% L
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Porto II - second-half results

0% W25% D75% L
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CD Tondela - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.250.25
Goals scored / match0.50.0
Goals conceded / match0.51.0
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal50%75%
2 goals25%25%
3 goals25%0%
Clean sheet50%25%
No goal75%100%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 25% leading - 50% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 25% draw - 75% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 2
Porto II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.25
Goals scored / match0.50.0
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.51.0
1 goal100%75%
2 goals50%25%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet25%25%
No goal50%100%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 25% leading - 25% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 25% draw - 75% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CD Tondela
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
2
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Porto II
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
2
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
13%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
38%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CD Tondela

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.80
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
47%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Porto II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.91
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.75
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
43%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
189%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (LigaPro).

Teams vs league

CD TondelaLigaPorto II
Average goals in match▼ 2.002.22▲ 2.50
Both teams scored▼ 25%39%▼ 25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 25%36%▲ 50%
Clean sheets▼ 0%33%▼ 25%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%72%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time• 75%75%• 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.22
Average goals per match
39%
Both teams scored
36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.06
Home goals / match
1.17
Away goals / match
+-9%
Home attack advantage
+-10%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Porto IIYellow cardBernardo Pinto Lima
  2. Porto IIYellow cardTiago Gonçalves Silva
  3. CD TondelaYellow cardArjen van der Heide
  4. CD TondelaYellow cardGastón Novero
  5. Porto IIYellow cardDuarte Lopes Cunha
  6. Porto IIYellow cardMateus Souto Mide
  7. CD TondelaYellow cardJosé María Pérez García
  8. Porto IISubstitutionOn: Eirik Julius GranaasOff: Tiago Gonçalves Silva
  9. Porto IISubstitutionOn: Martim Araújo CunhaOff: Yoan da Silva Pereira
  10. CD TondelaSubstitutionOn: Xabier Huarte ArmendarizOff: Hugo Félix Sequeira

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of CD Tondela vs Porto II?

The LigaPro match finished CD Tondela 3:0 Porto II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Tondela vs Porto II?

CD Tondela score 0.50 goals per game on average and Porto II 0.50. The LigaPro average is 2.22 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 25% of CD Tondela's matches and 25% of Porto II's.

What form are CD Tondela and Porto II in?

Over the last 5 games CD Tondela have a 1-0-3 record (0.75 points per game) and Porto II 1-0-3 (0.75 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Tondela vs Porto II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.