Portugal - Liga 3Estádio do Clube Desportivo TrofenseData current as of 03 November 2026

CD Trofense vs AD Marco 09: match statistics

CD Trofense crest
CD Trofense
0 : 2half-time 0:1
AD Marco 09 crest
AD Marco 09

CD Trofense vs AD Marco 09: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CD Trofense played AD Marco 09 in Liga 3 (Portugal). The match was played on 31 October 2026. Venue: Estádio do Clube Desportivo Trofense. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

CD Trofense: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. AD Marco 09: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

CD Trofense scores 0.57 and concedes 1.86 goals per match. AD Marco 09 scores 0.86 and concedes 0.71. League average: 2.63 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CD Trofense 29%, AD Marco 09 29%. Over 2.5: CD Trofense 43%, AD Marco 09 29%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

AD Marco 09 has higher xG: 1.07 vs 0.81. CD Trofense: 5.6 shots per match, AD Marco 09: 8.0.

Match halves

CD Trofense: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.29. AD Marco 09: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

CD Trofense: 76-90+ (2 goals). AD Marco 09: 61-75 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 3: 2.63 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

AD Marco 09 sit 2nd in the table, while CD Trofense are 10th, a gap reflected in their last five matches: the visitors have earned 7 points, compared with just 2 for the hosts. Trofense lost 3 of those games and conceded as many as 15 goals, while Marco 09 conceded 5. At home, the hosts concede an average of 1.67 goals, while their opponents allow chances worth an average xG of 1.14 on the road, suggesting the visitors have the more solid defence. Marco 09 create chances worth an average xG of 1.11 away from home, compared with Trofense's 0.90 at home, but score just 0.33 goals per match on the road and have yet to win any of their three away games. The visitors therefore have no clear advantage, but Trofense's fragile defence and run of five matches without a win support the '2' pick.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal against both teams scoring is AD Marco 09’s attacking output: the visitors average just 0.33 goals away from home and have failed to score in 67% of those matches. CD Trofense keep a clean sheet in 75% of their home games, conceding an average of 0.25 goals, further limiting the visitors’ chances. The hosts are more likely to score, averaging 1.25 goals at home, while Marco concede 1.33 goals away. A counterpoint is Trofense’s recent defensive decline: they conceded an average of 3 goals across five matches. However, Marco scored just 0.4 goals per game over the same period. With season-long BTTS rates of 25% and 33%, respectively, it is more likely that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: this line has not been breached in CD Trofense’s home matches or AD Marco 09’s away matches. The hosts concede an average of 0.25 goals at home and keep a clean sheet in 75% of matches, while the visitors score just 0.33 goals on average away from home and fail to score in 67% of matches. Although both teams’ xG in these conditions is similar — 1.05 for the hosts versus 1.11 for the visitors — Marco’s poor away finishing limits the forecast to 2.18 total goals. Caution is warranted, as Trofense conceded an average of 3.0 goals across their last five matches, but the visitors’ weak attacking record makes Under 3.5 goals a stronger signal than lower lines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A half-time draw appears the most likely outcome: Trofense were level at the break in 3 of their 4 home matches, while Marco 09 failed to score before half-time in all 3 of their away matches. After the break, the advantage shifts towards the hosts, who average 1.0 goal in the second half and have won 3 of their 4 home matches, while the visitors have failed to win any of their 3 away games. However, this is not a strong signal: across their last 5 matches regardless of venue, Trofense have not recorded a win, while Marco 09 have won twice. In addition, the teams' average xG figures are similar—1.05 for the hosts and 1.11 for the visitors—so I rate a half-time draw followed by a Trofense win as the most likely HT/FT outcome, but with moderate confidence.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
5Shots5
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
5Shots on target5
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
1.31xG1.11
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
7Corners4
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
88Dangerous attacks60
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
11Fouls19
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
0Cards0
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
0.57Goals scored / match0.86
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
1.86Goals conceded / match0.71
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
40%Average possession47%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
1.71Shots on target / match3.14
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.57Shots per match8
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
1.71Shots on target3.14
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
10.3%Shot conversion10.7%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
40%Possession47%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
0.81xG for1.07
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
1.64xG against1.1
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09

Shooting quality

CD Trofense: BalancedAD Marco 09: Balanced
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
Accuracy (shots on target)31%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

AD Marco 09 is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - CD Trofense · 1.6 pts / match - AD Marco 09

CD Trofense
WDLDL
Season result split
14% W29% D57% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-4
0.71 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-2
Last 5 at home
1-0-2
LWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 0.82Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
AD Marco 09
WDWLD
Season result split
43% W29% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-2
1.57 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-2
Last 5 away
0-1-2
LDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AD Marco 09 is 51% better for: goals scored per match.

0.57 goals / match - CD Trofense · 0.86 goals / match - AD Marco 09

AD Marco 09 is 162% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.86 goals / match - CD Trofense · 0.71 goals / match - AD Marco 09

CD Trofense scoring profile: more difficult

CD Trofense scores in 43% of matches (3 of 7 matches), while AD Marco 09 keeps a clean sheet in 57% (4 of 7 matches).

AD Marco 09 scoring profile: strong

AD Marco 09 scores in 57% of matches (4 of 7 matches), while CD Trofense keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).

4Goals scored (season)6
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
13Goals conceded (season)5
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
2.43Average goals in match1.57
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
4Goals scored (last 5)3
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
10Goals conceded (last 5)2
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09

How often they score at least...

43%1 goal57%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
14%2 goals29%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
0%3 goals0%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
0%4 goals0%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal43%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
57%2 goals29%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
29%3 goals0%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
29%4 goals0%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time0%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
0%BTTS in both halves0%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
14%Scored in both halves14%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
40%BTTS - last 50%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time43%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
29%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
14%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AD Marco 09 is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.71 pts / match - CD Trofense · 1 pts / match - AD Marco 09

CD Trofense - half-time state
14% leading29% draw57% trailing
AD Marco 09 - half-time state
14% leading57% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.71Points per match (1st half)1
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.14
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
1.14Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
1.43Average goals (1st half)0.57
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
43%Clean sheet before half-time71%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
71%No goal before half-time86%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09

After half-time (2nd half)

0.71Points per match (2nd half)1.71
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
0.29Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)0.29
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
1Average goals (2nd half)1
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
43%Clean sheet after half-time71%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09
71%No goal after half-time43%
CD TrofenseAD Marco 09

CD Trofense - second-half results

14% W29% D57% L
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

AD Marco 09 - second-half results

43% W43% D14% L
7
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding307%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CD Trofense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match1.61.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-4-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
AD Marco 09 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.20.8
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CD Trofense
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
1
2
16-30
0
3
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
2
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

AD Marco 09
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
3
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.6 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
76%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
29%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-25%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
25%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
25%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CD Trofense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.83
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
39%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
159%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

AD Marco 09

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
49%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).

Teams vs league

CD TrofenseLigaAD Marco 09
Average goals in match▼ 2.432.63▼ 1.57
Both teams scored▼ 29%52%▼ 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 43%52%▼ 29%
Clean sheets• 29%30%▲ 57%
Goal before half-time• 71%70%▼ 43%
Goal after half-time• 71%70%• 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.63
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.17
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): CD Trofense 0 - 1 - 1 AD Marco 09. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

CD Trofense
0 : 1
Associação Desportiva de Marco de Canaveses 09
Associação Desportiva de Marco de Canaveses 09
1 : 1
CD Trofense

FAQ

What was the result of CD Trofense vs AD Marco 09?

The Liga 3 match finished CD Trofense 0:2 AD Marco 09. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between CD Trofense and AD Marco 09?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches CD Trofense won 0, AD Marco 09 won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Trofense vs AD Marco 09?

CD Trofense score 0.57 goals per game on average and AD Marco 09 0.86. The Liga 3 average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 29% of CD Trofense's matches and 29% of AD Marco 09's.

What form are CD Trofense and AD Marco 09 in?

Over the last 5 games CD Trofense have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and AD Marco 09 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Trofense vs AD Marco 09?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.