Portugal - Liga 3Data current as of 22 July 2026

CD Trofense vs Amarante: match statistics

CD Trofense crest
CD Trofense
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Amarante crest
Amarante

CD Trofense vs Amarante: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CD Trofense play Amarante in Liga 3 (Portugal). The match date is 1 May 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

CD Trofense: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Amarante: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

CD Trofense scores 0.94 and concedes 0.97 goals per match. Amarante scores 1.28 and concedes 0.88. League average: 2.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CD Trofense 47%, Amarante 47%. Over 2.5: CD Trofense 31%, Amarante 41%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.

xG, shots and style

CD Trofense has higher xG: 1.14 vs 1.07. CD Trofense: 7.7 shots per match, Amarante: 8.1.

Match halves

CD Trofense: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.41. Amarante: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.81.

Goals by minute

CD Trofense: 16-30 (6 goals). Amarante: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 3: 2.23 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-1-2. Average goals 1.33, BTTS 33%.

Match description

I predict an away win (2). Amarante holds a clear advantage in season metrics: 15 wins and 37 goals compared to CD Trofense’s 9 wins and 28 goals, and in the last 5 matches the visitors scored 9 goals and remained unbeaten (2 wins, 3 draws), while the hosts have scored only 2 goals and suffered 4 defeats in that period. Defensively Amarante also performs better — they concede on average 0.93 goals away, while Trofense concedes 1.07 goals at home, with 36% clean sheets for the visitors versus 14% for the hosts. Although Trofense has a higher home xG (1.23 vs 1.05 xG for Amarante away), the hosts’ lower shot conversion (12% vs 15% for the visitors) and 43% of matches without scoring at home versus 36% for the visitors indicate finishing issues. Considering form (0.6 points per match for Trofense vs 1.8 for Amarante), superior efficiency and more solid away defense, I assess the probabilities as: home 15%, draw 25%, Amarante win 60%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
CD TrofenseAmarante
7Shots9
CD TrofenseAmarante
4Shots on target2
CD TrofenseAmarante
1xG1.06
CD TrofenseAmarante
3Corners5
CD TrofenseAmarante
38Dangerous attacks47
CD TrofenseAmarante
-1Fouls-1
CD TrofenseAmarante
2Cards2
CD TrofenseAmarante

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CD TrofenseAmarante
0.94Goals scored / match1.28
CD TrofenseAmarante
0.97Goals conceded / match0.88
CD TrofenseAmarante
51%Average possession45%
CD TrofenseAmarante
3.19Shots on target / match2.91
CD TrofenseAmarante

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.72Shots per match8.09
CD TrofenseAmarante
3.19Shots on target2.91
CD TrofenseAmarante
12.1%Shot conversion15.8%
CD TrofenseAmarante
51%Possession45%
CD TrofenseAmarante
1.14xG for1.07
CD TrofenseAmarante
1.26xG against1.33
CD TrofenseAmarante

Shooting quality

CD Trofense: BalancedAmarante: Counter-attacking
CD TrofenseAmarante
Accuracy (shots on target)41%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Amarante is 450% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - CD Trofense · 2.2 pts / match - Amarante

CD Trofense
LLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
28% W34% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-11-12
1.19 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-5-8
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Amarante
WDDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
53% W28% R19% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-9-6
1.88 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-4-4
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WDWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Amarante is 36% better for: goals scored per match.

0.94 goals / match - CD Trofense · 1.28 goals / match - Amarante

Amarante is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.97 goals / match - CD Trofense · 0.88 goals / match - Amarante

CD Trofense scoring profile: mixed

CD Trofense scores in 56% of matches (18 of 32 matches), while Amarante keeps a clean sheet in 41% (13 of 32 matches).

Amarante scoring profile: very strong

Amarante scores in 75% of matches (24 of 32 matches), while CD Trofense keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).

30Goals scored (season)41
CD TrofenseAmarante
31Goals conceded (season)28
CD TrofenseAmarante
1.91Average goals in match2.16
CD TrofenseAmarante
1Goals scored (last 5)10
CD TrofenseAmarante
6Goals conceded (last 5)4
CD TrofenseAmarante

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal75%
CD TrofenseAmarante
22%2 goals34%
CD TrofenseAmarante
6%3 goals16%
CD TrofenseAmarante
6%4 goals3%
CD TrofenseAmarante

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal59%
CD TrofenseAmarante
19%2 goals25%
CD TrofenseAmarante
3%3 goals3%
CD TrofenseAmarante
0%4 goals0%
CD TrofenseAmarante

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time16%
CD TrofenseAmarante
3%BTTS in both halves9%
CD TrofenseAmarante
16%Scored in both halves22%
CD TrofenseAmarante

BTTS and goal count

28%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
CD TrofenseAmarante
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
CD TrofenseAmarante
20%BTTS - last 560%
CD TrofenseAmarante

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

66%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
CD TrofenseAmarante
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
CD TrofenseAmarante
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
CD TrofenseAmarante

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
CD TrofenseAmarante
19%Min. 2 goals after half-time34%
CD TrofenseAmarante
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
CD TrofenseAmarante

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CD Trofense is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.31 pts / match - CD Trofense · 1.25 pts / match - Amarante

CD Trofense - half-time state
28% leading47% draw25% trailing
Amarante - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.31Points per match (1st half)1.25
CD TrofenseAmarante
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.47
CD TrofenseAmarante
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
CD TrofenseAmarante
1.03Average goals (1st half)0.91
CD TrofenseAmarante
56%Clean sheet before half-time63%
CD TrofenseAmarante
59%No goal before half-time59%
CD TrofenseAmarante

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per match (2nd half)1.72
CD TrofenseAmarante
0.41Goals scored (2nd half)0.81
CD TrofenseAmarante
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)0.44
CD TrofenseAmarante
0.88Average goals (2nd half)1.25
CD TrofenseAmarante
53%Clean sheet after half-time59%
CD TrofenseAmarante
69%No goal after half-time44%
CD TrofenseAmarante

CD Trofense - second-half results

19% W50% R31% P
42
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Amarante - second-half results

44% W41% R16% P
40
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
55
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding212%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CD Trofense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.40
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.80.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Amarante - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+4+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CD Trofense
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
6
8
16-30
6
4
31-45
5
5
46-60
2
4
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Amarante
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
7
1
16-30
4
8
31-45
3
3
46-60
10
3
61-75
13
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.04
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-35%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CD Trofense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.79
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Amarante

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.66
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).

Teams vs league

CD TrofenseLigaAmarante
Average goals in match 1.912.23 2.16
Both teams scored 47%49% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 31%40% 41%
Clean sheets 25%31% 41%
Goal before half-time 66%66% 63%
Goal after half-time 63%74% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.23
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.19
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): CD Trofense 0 - 1 - 2 Amarante. Average goals 1.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of CD Trofense vs Amarante?

The Liga 3 match finished CD Trofense 0:0 Amarante. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between CD Trofense and Amarante?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches CD Trofense won 0, Amarante won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Trofense vs Amarante?

CD Trofense score 0.94 goals per game on average and Amarante 1.28. The Liga 3 average is 2.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 47% of CD Trofense's matches and 47% of Amarante's.

What form are CD Trofense and Amarante in?

Over the last 5 games CD Trofense have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Amarante 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Trofense vs Amarante?

The statistical background for CD Trofense vs Amarante — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.