CDS Tampico Madero vs CA La Paz: match statistics
CDS Tampico Madero vs CA La Paz: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
CDS Tampico Madero played CA La Paz in Ascenso MX (Mexico). The match was played on 23 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
CDS Tampico Madero: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. CA La Paz: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
CDS Tampico Madero scores 1.35 and concedes 0.94 goals per match. CA La Paz scores 1.68 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.89 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: CDS Tampico Madero 56%, CA La Paz 61%. Over 2.5: CDS Tampico Madero 41%, CA La Paz 57%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
CA La Paz has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.36. CDS Tampico Madero: 12.1 shots per match, CA La Paz: 13.4.
Match halves
CDS Tampico Madero: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.71. CA La Paz: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.75.
Goals by minute
CDS Tampico Madero: 16-30 (11 goals). CA La Paz: 31-45+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ascenso MX: 2.89 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1). CDS Tampico Madero has a 71% win rate at home, scores on average 1.71 goals and concedes only 0.82 goals per match, with a home goal difference of +15. Offensively the hosts create more chances: on average 14.71 shots and 4.41 on target per match with xG 1.54, while CA La Paz away averages 10.64 shots and 3.71 on target with xG 1.27. Defensively the hosts have a clear advantage — visitors concede on average 1.57 goals away and have xG against of 1.96, whereas the hosts have xG against 0.93 and 35% clean sheets at home. In the last 5 matches Tampico averaged 1.8 points per game (5 scored, 3 conceded), and La Paz 1.2 points per game (8 scored, 6 conceded), therefore I assess the probabilities as: home 70%, draw 18%, away 12%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal metrics for both teams strongly support BTTS: Tampico has BTTS 57% and La Paz 64%, versus a league average of 56%. In the last 5 matches Tampico shows BTTS 60% with an average 1.0 goals scored and 0.6 conceded, while La Paz posts BTTS 80% with 1.6 scored and 1.2 conceded, indicating visitors regularly score and hosts also typically find the net. Looking at xG and chance creation, the hosts have xG 1.91 and 7.07 shots on target per match, whereas La Paz has xG 1.27 and 3.71 shots on target; additionally La Paz concedes xG against 1.96, so the visitors’ defense is vulnerable to shots. Clean sheets occur for Tampico in 36% of games and for La Paz only in 21%, and Tampico fail to score in 7% of matches versus 21% for La Paz — this means the hosts rarely shut up shop while the visitors have a low rate of clean sheets. Summing these figures (seasonal and recent metrics average ≈60–70%), I project the BTTS — Yes scenario as more likely: 70% Yes, 30% No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model (home attack 1.91 vs away defense conceding 1.96) yields an expected 1.94 goals for CDS Tampico Madero, while the combination of La Paz attack 1.27 and home defense conceding 1.40 gives 1.33 goals for the visitors; total xG = 3.27. Seasonal metrics confirm high goal potential: Tampico has Over 1.5 in 93% of matches and Over 2.5 in 64%, La Paz has Over 1.5 in 79% and Over 2.5 in 50%, and the league records Over 2.5 in 54% of fixtures. Additionally both teams frequently score (BTTS 57% for the home side and 64% for the visitors) and in the last 5 matches they scored 5 and 8 goals respectively; the hosts average 7.07 shots on target versus 3.71 for the guests. A Poisson simulation with mean 3.27 indicates probabilities: Over 1.5 ≈84%, Over 2.5 ≈63% and Over 3.5 ≈41%. Therefore the strongest play is Over 1.5 (over) at the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is 1/1 (51%), because the home side led at the break in 7 matches (50% of the season) and in 3 of the last 5 fixtures (60%). This is supported by attacking metrics: home xG 1.91 versus away 1.27, an average of 16.07 shots and 7.07 shots on target per game compared to 10.64 and 3.71 for CA La Paz, and the homes’ average goals at half-time is 1.00 versus 0.86 for opponents. At full-time the home team wins 43% of matches and averages 1.64 points per game versus 21% and 1.14 points for the away side, while the visitors concede an average of 1.96 xG against, which favors the retention of the home lead. There is a risk of a turnaround, since BTTS is 57% for the home team and 64% for the visitors, but the hosts have 64% clean halves at the break and did not concede before half-time in the last 5 matches (0.0), reducing the likelihood of a rapid away comeback. Therefore the recommendation is 1/1 as the strongest and most consistent signal from the presented data.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| CDS Tampico Madero | CA La Paz | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
CDS Tampico Madero is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - CDS Tampico Madero · 1.2 pts / match - CA La Paz
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CA La Paz is 24% better for: goals scored per match.
1.35 goals / match - CDS Tampico Madero · 1.68 goals / match - CA La Paz
CDS Tampico Madero is 60% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.94 goals / match - CDS Tampico Madero · 1.5 goals / match - CA La Paz
CDS Tampico Madero scores in 76% of matches (26 of 34 matches), while CA La Paz keeps a clean sheet in 29% (8 of 28 matches).
CA La Paz scores in 86% of matches (24 of 28 matches), while CDS Tampico Madero keeps a clean sheet in 32% (11 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CDS Tampico Madero
Over / Under - CA La Paz
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CDS Tampico Madero is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.62 pts / match - CDS Tampico Madero · 1.5 pts / match - CA La Paz
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CDS Tampico Madero - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
CA La Paz - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 32%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
CDS Tampico Madero
CA La Paz
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ascenso MX).
Teams vs league
| CDS Tampico Madero | Liga | CA La Paz | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.29 | 2.89 | ▲ 3.18 |
| Both teams scored | • 56% | 57% | ▲ 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 41% | 54% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 32% | 25% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 71% | 75% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 80% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): CDS Tampico Madero 1 - 1 - 0 CA La Paz. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of CDS Tampico Madero vs CA La Paz?
The Ascenso MX match finished CDS Tampico Madero 2:0 CA La Paz. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between CDS Tampico Madero and CA La Paz?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches CDS Tampico Madero won 1, CA La Paz won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before CDS Tampico Madero vs CA La Paz?
CDS Tampico Madero score 1.35 goals per game on average and CA La Paz 1.68. The Ascenso MX average is 2.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 56% of CDS Tampico Madero's matches and 61% of CA La Paz's.
What form are CDS Tampico Madero and CA La Paz in?
Over the last 5 games CDS Tampico Madero have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and CA La Paz 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CDS Tampico Madero vs CA La Paz?
The statistical background for CDS Tampico Madero vs CA La Paz — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


