Ceramica Cleopatra vs Al Masry: match statistics
Ceramica Cleopatra vs Al Masry: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ceramica Cleopatra played Al Masry in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 1 May 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Ceramica Cleopatra: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Al Masry: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ceramica Cleopatra scores 1.43 and concedes 0.78 goals per match. Al Masry scores 1.42 and concedes 1.13. League average: 1.99 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ceramica Cleopatra 43%, Al Masry 54%. Over 2.5: Ceramica Cleopatra 26%, Al Masry 46%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 32%.
xG, shots and style
Al Masry has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.22. Ceramica Cleopatra: 10.0 shots per match, Al Masry: 11.0.
Match halves
Ceramica Cleopatra: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.87. Al Masry: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.92.
Goals by minute
Ceramica Cleopatra: 76-90+ (9 goals). Al Masry: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Egyptian Premier League: 1.99 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 32%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Ceramica Cleopatra holds a clear advantage in home metrics: at home they score on average 1.73 goals per match and have a 64% win rate with an average of 0.91 goals conceded, while Al Masry on the road average only 0.92 goals and win 25% of matches. The hosts create more high-quality chances — 11.45 shots and 4.27 on target per match with 15% conversion, compared to visitors’ 10.42 shots, 3.75 on target and 9% conversion away. In the last five matches Ceramica have 1 win and 4 draws (6 scored, 4 conceded, 1.4 points per match), whereas Al Masry have 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss (7 scored, 9 conceded, 1.2 points per match), indicating a weaker away defense. xG data also favor the hosts: Ceramica have average xG 1.33 with xG against 1.25, while Al Masry record xG 1.22 with xG against 1.40, suggesting the hosts generate more valuable chances and are less exposed to counters. Considering better conversion (15% vs 9%), a lower share of matches without a goal for Ceramica (9% vs 33%) and the home goal difference (+9 for hosts vs 0 for visitors away), I assess the probabilities as: home win 60%, draw 25%, away win 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistics indicate a tilt toward a Both Teams To Score scenario. Ceramica has BTTS in 67% of season matches, while Al Masry sits at 42% — however, in the last 5 games Ceramica recorded BTTS in 60% and Al Masry in 80%, which amplifies the form signal. Ceramica averages 1.92 goals per game (xG 1.28) with 11.58 shots and a 17% conversion rate, whereas Al Masry has 0.92 goals seasonally (xG 1.22) but improved to 1.4 goals in the last 5 matches and conceded 1.8 goals on average (9 conceded goals in 5 games). Additionally, xG against is 1.17 for Ceramica and 1.4 for Al Masry, and shots on target are comparable (3.5 vs 3.75), indicating the home side creates chances that the opponent has recently been converting. Based on this I estimate BTTS at 66% (Yes) vs 34% (No) and recommend the 'yes' selection.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Ceramica Cleopatra scores on average 1.92 goals at home (xG 1.28) with a shot conversion rate of 17%, while Al Masry away averages 0.92 goals (xG 1.22) with a 9% conversion. Combined xG for both teams is 1.28+1.22=2.50, but the home side historically converts xG to goals (+0.64: 1.92−1.28) and the visitors have a negative delta (−0.30: 0.92−1.22), which net pushes the projection to about 2.84–2.85 goals. Season percentages for matches over 1.5 are 83% for Ceramica and 58% for Al Masry (average ~71%), while for the 2.5 line it's 67% vs 25% (average ~46%), so the strongest signal is for Over 1.5. The last 5 matches show some volatility (Over 2.5: home 20% vs away 60%) but do not negate the statistical edge for Over 1.5, hence the recommendation Over 1.5 with a projection of ~1.90 goals for the home team and ~0.95 goals for the away team (total ~2.85).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back X/1 (draw at half-time, home win) because a half-time draw is a common outcome: Ceramica were level at the break in 42% of matches, and Al Masry in 50%. The home side dominate after the interval — they average 1.33 goals in the second half versus 0.5 for Al Masry, and in minutes 61–90 Ceramica scored 13 goals (7 in 61–75 and 6 in 76–90) compared to 4 for their opponents. Over the full match Ceramica record 1.92 goals per game versus 0.92 for Al Masry and win 50% of matches against 25% for the visitors, which supports a home victory. Additionally, the hosts’ conversion rate is 17% versus 9% for their rivals, and Al Masry concedes 1.4 xG per game against 1.17 for Ceramica, so greater efficiency and superiority in chances favor a turnaround after half-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Al Masry | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1 pts / match - Al Masry
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 45% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.78 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.13 goals / match - Al Masry
Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 83% of matches (19 of 23 matches), while Al Masry keeps a clean sheet in 38% (9 of 24 matches).
Al Masry scores in 79% of matches (19 of 24 matches), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 43% (10 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ceramica Cleopatra
Over / Under - Al Masry
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.61 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.33 pts / match - Al Masry
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Al Masry - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ceramica Cleopatra
Al Masry
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Liga | Al Masry | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.22 | 1.99 | ▲ 2.54 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 46% | ▲ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 26% | 32% | ▲ 46% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 35% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | • 57% | 56% | ▲ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 70% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Ceramica Cleopatra 0 - 0 - 1 Al Masry. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Ceramica Cleopatra vs Al Masry?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Ceramica Cleopatra 0:1 Al Masry. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ceramica Cleopatra vs Al Masry?
Ceramica Cleopatra score 1.43 goals per game on average and Al Masry 1.42. The Egyptian Premier League average is 1.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Ceramica Cleopatra's matches and 54% of Al Masry's.
What form are Ceramica Cleopatra and Al Masry in?
Over the last 5 games Ceramica Cleopatra have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Al Masry 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Al Masry?
The statistical background for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Al Masry — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.