Uruguay - Primera DivisiónEstadio Monumental Luis TróccoliData current as of 07 September 2026

Cerro vs Racing: match statistics

Cerro crest
Cerro
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Racing crest
Racing

Cerro vs Racing: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cerro played Racing in Primera División (Uruguay). The match was played on 6 September 2026. Venue: Estadio Monumental Luis Tróccoli. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Cerro: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Racing: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cerro scores 0.69 and concedes 1.54 goals per match. Racing scores 1.23 and concedes 0.73. League average: 2.36 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cerro 42%, Racing 46%. Over 2.5: Cerro 38%, Racing 27%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Racing has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.22. Cerro: 10.4 shots per match, Racing: 13.0.

Match halves

Cerro: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.27. Racing: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.62.

Goals by minute

Cerro: 76-90+ (6 goals). Racing: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Primera División: 2.36 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-2. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 25%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Racing sit 3rd, while Cerro are sixth, and the full-season record clearly favors the visitors: 13 wins and just 3 defeats compared with the hosts’ 7 victories and 14 losses. The visitors are unbeaten in their last five matches, have collected 11 points during that run and conceded only 2 goals, whereas Cerro have conceded 7 in the same period. Away from home, Racing create more chances, averaging 12.58 shots and an xG of 1.56, compared with Cerro’s 10 shots and 1.25 xG at home. The hosts defend well on their own ground, conceding just 0.67 goals per match on average, which significantly increases the draw risk. Nevertheless, Racing average 1.08 goals away from home, have a better shot conversion rate, 9% compared with 8%, and should hold a slight edge in a balanced, relatively low-scoring match.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

A scenario in which one of the teams fails to score is more likely, as Cerro have kept a clean sheet in 57% of their matches, while Racing have failed to score in 33% of their games. The strongest signal comes from Racing’s current form: in their last 5 appearances, the team conceded just 2 goals, averaging 0.4 per match, while BTTS occurred in only 20% of those games. Over the same period, Cerro created chances worth just 0.91 xG per match, which, combined with the 0.93 xG Racing concede on average, reduces their chances of scoring. The hosts have recently conceded 1.4 goals per match and allowed opponents 1.78 xG, so Racing have solid grounds to find the net, but a result with Cerro failing to score looks more realistic than a goal exchange. Cerro’s seasonal BTTS rate of 43% and Racing’s 50% also provide no advantage to the BTTS - Yes / Goal/Goal outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The season profile clearly points to a low-scoring game: 79% of Cerro’s matches and 67% of Racing’s ended with fewer than 2.5 goals, compared with the league average of 56%. The signal is even stronger for the 3.5-goal line, which was not surpassed in 86% and 83% of the respective teams’ matches. Cerro concede an average of just 0.64 goals, keeping a clean sheet in 57% of their matches, while Racing have conceded only 0.4 goals per game across their last five matches. Although both teams’ season-average xG figures stand at 1.55 and 1.56, Cerro’s latest attacking xG has dropped to 0.91, while Racing allow opponents just 0.93 xG. The projected total of 2.04 goals provides a clear safety margin for an Under 3.5 goals bet.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw both at half-time and at full-time, as Racing were level at the break in 67% of their away matches, while Cerro were level at half-time in 43% of their home fixtures. Both teams’ first halves are low-scoring: each averages exactly 1.0 total goal before the break, with Cerro conceding only 0.29 goals per match during that period. Their full-match records also point to a closely contested encounter: Cerro average 1.36 goals at home, Racing 1.08 away, while their attacking xG figures are almost identical at 1.55 and 1.56, respectively. The full-time draw is further supported by high draw rates of 36% for Cerro and 42% for Racing. In addition, Racing are unbeaten in their last five matches and have conceded just 0.4 goals per game across that run. After the break, both sides remain defensively solid, conceding an average of 0.36 and 0.33 goals respectively, which reduces the likelihood of a decisive outcome following an evenly matched start.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

37Possession (%)63
CerroRacing
5Shots5
CerroRacing
4Shots on target5
CerroRacing
0.98xG1.44
CerroRacing
4Corners9
CerroRacing
51Dangerous attacks107
CerroRacing
-1Fouls-1
CerroRacing
4Cards2
CerroRacing

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.69Goals scored / match1.23
CerroRacing
1.54Goals conceded / match0.73
CerroRacing
42%Average possession49%
CerroRacing
3.19Shots on target / match4.04
CerroRacing

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.42Shots per match12.96
CerroRacing
3.19Shots on target4.04
CerroRacing
6.6%Shot conversion9.5%
CerroRacing
42%Possession49%
CerroRacing
1.22xG for1.59
CerroRacing
1.55xG against1.07
CerroRacing

Shooting quality

Cerro: BalancedRacing: Balanced
CerroRacing
Accuracy (shots on target)31%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Racing is 57% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Cerro · 2.2 pts / match - Racing

Cerro
LWWLD
Season result split
27% W19% R54% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-5-14
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-4
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.90Opponent xG: 1.93BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Racing
WDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W38% R12% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-10-3
1.88 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-2
Last 5 away
0-4-1
DDLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.06BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Racing is 78% better for: goals scored per match.

0.69 goals / match - Cerro · 1.23 goals / match - Racing

Racing is 111% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.54 goals / match - Cerro · 0.73 goals / match - Racing

Cerro scoring profile: mixed

Cerro scores in 62% of matches (16 of 26 matches), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 46% (12 of 26 matches).

Racing scoring profile: very strong

Racing scores in 81% of matches (21 of 26 matches), while Cerro keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 26 matches).

18Goals scored (season)32
CerroRacing
40Goals conceded (season)19
CerroRacing
2.23Average goals in match1.96
CerroRacing
5Goals scored (last 5)6
CerroRacing
8Goals conceded (last 5)2
CerroRacing

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal81%
CerroRacing
8%2 goals31%
CerroRacing
0%3 goals8%
CerroRacing
0%4 goals4%
CerroRacing

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal54%
CerroRacing
35%2 goals12%
CerroRacing
27%3 goals4%
CerroRacing
12%4 goals4%
CerroRacing

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time23%
CerroRacing
0%BTTS in both halves4%
CerroRacing
8%Scored in both halves15%
CerroRacing

BTTS and goal count

23%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
CerroRacing
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
CerroRacing
60%BTTS - last 520%
CerroRacing

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
CerroRacing
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
CerroRacing
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
CerroRacing

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time58%
CerroRacing
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
CerroRacing
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
CerroRacing

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Racing is 65% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.96 pts / match - Cerro · 1.58 pts / match - Racing

Cerro - half-time state
12% leading62% draw27% trailing
Racing - half-time state
35% leading54% draw12% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.96Points per match (1st half)1.58
CerroRacing
0.42Goals scored (1st half)0.62
CerroRacing
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
CerroRacing
1.04Average goals (1st half)1
CerroRacing
54%Clean sheet before half-time69%
CerroRacing
58%No goal before half-time46%
CerroRacing

After half-time (2nd half)

0.85Points per match (2nd half)1.42
CerroRacing
0.27Goals scored (2nd half)0.62
CerroRacing
0.92Goals conceded (2nd half)0.35
CerroRacing
1.19Average goals (2nd half)0.96
CerroRacing
38%Clean sheet after half-time73%
CerroRacing
73%No goal after half-time58%
CerroRacing

Cerro - second-half results

19% W27% R54% P
25
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-17
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.96
PPG before half-time
Lead holding225%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Racing - second-half results

31% W50% R19% P
41
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.58
PPG before half-time
Lead holding143%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Cerro - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+1-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4
Racing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cerro
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
4
4
16-30
4
9
31-45
0
3
46-60
1
5
61-75
6
16
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.

Racing
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
6
3
16-30
6
4
31-45
2
1
46-60
6
3
61-75
8
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.09
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-28%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cerro

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+12.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.53
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
53%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
147%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Racing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

CerroLigaRacing
Average goals in match 2.232.36 1.96
Both teams scored 42%49% 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%44% 27%
Clean sheets 19%29% 46%
Goal before half-time 58%66% 62%
Goal after half-time 81%73% 58%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.36
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.31
Home goals / match
1.05
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Cerro 2 - 0 - 2 Racing. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 25% matches.

Cerro
1 : 0
Racing
Racing
1 : 0
Cerro
Club Atlético Cerro
1 : 2
Racing Club de Montevideo
Racing Club de Montevideo
0 : 1
Club Atlético Cerro

FAQ

What was the result of Cerro vs Racing?

The Primera División match finished Cerro 1:0 Racing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cerro and Racing?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Cerro won 2, Racing won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cerro vs Racing?

Cerro score 0.69 goals per game on average and Racing 1.23. The Primera División average is 2.36 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Cerro's matches and 46% of Racing's.

What form are Cerro and Racing in?

Over the last 5 games Cerro have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Racing 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cerro vs Racing?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.