Italy - Serie BOrogel Stadium-Dino ManuzziData current as of 07 September 2026

Cesena vs Mantova: match statistics

Cesena crest
Cesena
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Mantova crest
Mantova

Cesena vs Mantova: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cesena played Mantova in Serie B (Italy). The match was played on 6 September 2026. Venue: Orogel Stadium-Dino Manuzzi. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Cesena: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match. Mantova: 2-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cesena scores 1.50 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Mantova scores 2.50 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.48 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cesena 100%, Mantova 100%. Over 2.5: Cesena 50%, Mantova 100%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Mantova has higher xG: 1.59 vs 0.80. Cesena: 7.0 shots per match, Mantova: 14.0.

Match halves

Cesena: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 0.00. Mantova: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 2.00.

Goals by minute

Cesena: 16-30 (2 goals). Mantova: 61-75 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie B: 2.48 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Mantova sit 2nd, have won both of their league matches so far, and have recorded 4 wins in their last five games, while Cesena’s recent run stands at 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 defeat. The visitors are clearly more dangerous offensively away from home: they average 2 goals, 12 shots and 4 shots on target per match, compared with Cesena’s 1 goal, 7 shots and 2 shots on target at home. The quality of chances created also favours Mantova, who average 1.34 xG, whereas Cesena produce just 0.78 xG while allowing opponents as much as 2.72 xG. The hosts have yet to keep a clean sheet, and with average possession of just 35%, they may spend long periods defending against a Mantova side that controls the ball 52% of the time. Cesena drew their only home match so far, so a draw remains a realistic outcome, but the numbers point more strongly towards an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have recorded BTTS in 100% of their matches so far this season, and neither has kept a clean sheet yet. Cesena create more chances at home, posting an xG of 1.84 and 9 shots on target per match, while Mantova average an xG of 1.34 and 4 shots on target. However, the visitors are in good offensive form: they have scored 10 goals in their last five matches, averaging 2.0 per game, while Cesena conceded an average of 1.0 goal during this period. A factor limiting confidence is that BTTS landed in only 40% of Cesena’s and 60% of Mantova’s last five matches, although Mantova conceded as many as 1.8 goals per game in that period, with an against xG of 1.58. BTTS has occurred in 70% of league matches, so the most likely scenario remains a game in which both teams score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Cesena’s last five matches produced an average of 2.2 goals, while Mantova’s games averaged as many as 3.8 goals, clearly supporting at least two goals. Mantova have scored 2.0 goals per match over this period, while Cesena have conceded an average of 1.0, and the hosts may take advantage of a visiting defense allowing 1.8 goals per game. The creative potential is also solid: average xG from the last five matches stands at 1.21 for Cesena and 1.58 for Mantova, while both teams allow their opponents around 1.6 xG. Furthermore, Over 2.5 goals landed in 60% of Cesena’s last five matches and 80% of Mantova’s, making Over 1.5 the safest betting angle.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Cesena have a clear attacking edge: their average xG stands at 1.84 compared with Mantova’s 1.34, while the hosts average 9 shots on target per match versus 4 for their opponents. In their last five matches, Cesena led at the break in 60% of games, compared with just 40% for Mantova, and the hosts averaged 0.8 goals before half-time against 0.6 for the visitors. The overall form picture remains balanced, however, as Mantova have won 4 of their last 5 matches and score an average of 2.0 goals, but concede as many as 1.8 goals per game. According to their season data, Cesena average 3.0 goals after the break and win the second half in 100% of cases, strengthening the scenario of maintaining or extending their lead. The most likely outcome is therefore Cesena leading at half-time and securing victory at the final whistle — HT/FT 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

67Possession (%)33
CesenaMantova
20Shots8
CesenaMantova
6Shots on target4
CesenaMantova
2.14xG0.91
CesenaMantova
10Corners4
CesenaMantova
64Dangerous attacks17
CesenaMantova
10Fouls8
CesenaMantova
0Cards1
CesenaMantova

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.5Goals scored / match2.5
CesenaMantova
1Goals conceded / match1
CesenaMantova
38%Average possession49%
CesenaMantova
2.5Shots on target / match6.5
CesenaMantova

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7Shots per match14
CesenaMantova
2.5Shots on target6.5
CesenaMantova
21.4%Shot conversion17.9%
CesenaMantova
38%Possession49%
CesenaMantova
0.8xG for1.59
CesenaMantova
2.13xG against0.93
CesenaMantova

Shooting quality

Cesena: Counter-attackingMantova: Attacking
CesenaMantova
Accuracy (shots on target)36%46%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.600.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mantova is 50% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Cesena · 3 pts / match - Mantova

Cesena
DW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 at home
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.80Opponent xG: 2.13BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 50%
Mantova
WW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.5Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 0.93BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mantova is 67% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Cesena · 2.5 goals / match - Mantova

Cesena scoring profile: very strong

Cesena scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Mantova keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

Mantova scoring profile: very strong

Mantova scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Cesena keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

3Goals scored (season)5
CesenaMantova
2Goals conceded (season)2
CesenaMantova
2.5Average goals in match3.5
CesenaMantova
3Goals scored (last 5)5
CesenaMantova
2Goals conceded (last 5)2
CesenaMantova

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
CesenaMantova
50%2 goals100%
CesenaMantova
0%3 goals50%
CesenaMantova
0%4 goals0%
CesenaMantova

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
CesenaMantova
0%2 goals0%
CesenaMantova
0%3 goals0%
CesenaMantova
0%4 goals0%
CesenaMantova

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time0%
CesenaMantova
0%BTTS in both halves0%
CesenaMantova
0%Scored in both halves50%
CesenaMantova

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
CesenaMantova
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
CesenaMantova
100%BTTS - last 5100%
CesenaMantova

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
CesenaMantova
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
CesenaMantova
50%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
CesenaMantova

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
CesenaMantova
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
CesenaMantova
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
CesenaMantova

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cesena is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

3 pts / match - Cesena · 2 pts / match - Mantova

Cesena - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing
Mantova - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

3Points per match (1st half)2
CesenaMantova
1.5Goals scored (1st half)0.5
CesenaMantova
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0
CesenaMantova
2Average goals (1st half)0.5
CesenaMantova
50%Clean sheet before half-time100%
CesenaMantova
0%No goal before half-time50%
CesenaMantova

After half-time (2nd half)

0.5Points per match (2nd half)2
CesenaMantova
0Goals scored (2nd half)2
CesenaMantova
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1
CesenaMantova
0.5Average goals (2nd half)3
CesenaMantova
50%Clean sheet after half-time0%
CesenaMantova
100%No goal after half-time0%
CesenaMantova

Cesena - second-half results

0% W50% R50% P
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 50%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mantova - second-half results

50% W50% R0% P
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cesena - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.000.50
Goals scored / match1.50.0
Goals conceded / match0.50.5
Average goals in match2.00.5
1 goal100%50%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals50%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal0%100%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 3
Mantova - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match0.52.0
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.53.0
1 goal50%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal50%0%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cesena
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Mantova
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
121%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
100%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cesena

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.83
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.70
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+1.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Mantova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.66
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.84
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.91
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
205%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.5
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie B).

Teams vs league

CesenaLigaMantova
Average goals in match 2.502.48 3.50
Both teams scored 100%61% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%52% 100%
Clean sheets 0%20% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%65% 50%
Goal after half-time 50%83% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.48
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+-4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MantovaYellow cardRachid Kouda
  2. MantovaSubstitutionOn: Ettore GliozziOff: Vanja Vlahović
  3. CesenaSubstitutionOn: Gianluca FrabottaOff: Antonio David
  4. CesenaSubstitutionOn: Luca D'AndreaOff: Xavello Druiventak

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Cesena 1 - 0 - 1 Mantova. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Cesena vs Mantova?

The Serie B match finished Cesena 1:1 Mantova. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cesena and Mantova?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Cesena won 1, Mantova won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cesena vs Mantova?

Cesena score 1.50 goals per game on average and Mantova 2.50. The Serie B average is 2.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Cesena's matches and 100% of Mantova's.

What form are Cesena and Mantova in?

Over the last 5 games Cesena have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and Mantova 2-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cesena vs Mantova?

The statistical background for Cesena vs Mantova — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.