Iran - Persian Gulf Pro LeagueNasiri StadiumData current as of 22 October 2026

Chadormalu SC vs Shams Azar Qazvin: match statistics

Chadormalu SC vs Shams Azar Qazvin: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chadormalu SC played Shams Azar Qazvin in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match was played on 6 September 2026. Venue: Nasiri Stadium. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Chadormalu SC: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Shams Azar Qazvin: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chadormalu SC scores 0.20 and concedes 1.60 goals per match. Shams Azar Qazvin scores 0.80 and concedes 1.00. League average: 1.74 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chadormalu SC 20%, Shams Azar Qazvin 40%. Over 2.5: Chadormalu SC 20%, Shams Azar Qazvin 20%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 19%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Chadormalu SC: -1.0 shots per match, Shams Azar Qazvin: -1.0.

Match halves

Chadormalu SC: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.00. Shams Azar Qazvin: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

Chadormalu SC: 16-30 (1 goals). Shams Azar Qazvin: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.74 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 19%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chadormalu SC sit 17th and remain winless after five matches, scoring just 1 goal while conceding 8. The hosts’ home form is particularly concerning: they have lost both matches played on home soil, failed to score in either, and are allowing opponents to average 2 goals per game. Shams Azar Qazvin are 10th, with a record of 1 win, 2 draws and 2 defeats, and have averaged 1 point per game over their last five league fixtures, compared with 0.4 for Chadormalu. Away from home, the visitors are unbeaten, winning 50% of their matches and drawing the remaining 50%, while averaging 1.5 goals scored and just 0.5 conceded per game. The contrast between the hosts’ scoreless attack and Shams Azar’s efficient, defensively solid away performances strongly points towards an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - No is not strongly supported by Chadormalu SC’s very weak attacking output, as they score just 0.33 goals per match on average and have failed to score in 67% of their games. In their last five appearances, the hosts managed only 0.2 goals per match, while BTTS occurred in just 20% of their matches. Shams Azar Qazvin keep a clean sheet in 50% of their games and concede an average of only 0.5 goals, further reducing the hosts’ chances of scoring. The visitors score 1.5 goals per match on average, making an away win to nil more likely than a Goal/Goal scenario. The league average BTTS rate of 31%, along with an average of 1.82 goals per match, also points to a competition with a low tendency for both teams to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match profile points to a low-scoring game: the league average is only 1.82 goals, and just 23% of matches have gone Over 2.5 goals. Chadormalu averages 0.33 goals at home, while Shams Azar concedes only 0.50 goals per away match, significantly limiting the hosts’ attacking prospects. In their last five matches, both teams had only 20% of games with at least three goals, while Chadormalu scored an average of just 0.2 goals. Both teams have so far recorded 100% of matches Under 3.5 goals, making Under 3.5 the strongest pick despite a forecast of approximately 1.70 total goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Shams Azar Qazvin win, as both teams were level after 45 minutes in 60% of their last five matches. Chadormalu have not led at the break in any of their home matches so far, while the visitors have never been behind at half-time and kept a clean sheet in 100% of their away appearances at that stage. Shams Azar’s advantage is clear over the full match: they average 1.50 goals scored and 0.50 conceded, compared with just 0.33 scored and 1.33 conceded by the hosts. After the break, the visitors average 1.00 goal, while Chadormalu have failed to score in this phase; in their last five matches, the hosts conceded as many as 1.40 goals per game after half-time. The X/2 scenario is also supported by the results record: Shams Azar have not lost a match, while Chadormalu have suffered defeat in 67% of their games.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
-1Shots-1
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
-1Shots on target-1
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
0xG0
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
-1Corners-1
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
0Dangerous attacks0
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
-1Fouls-1
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
3Cards2
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
0.2Goals scored / match0.8
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
1.6Goals conceded / match1
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
-1%Average possession-1%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
-1Shots on target / match-1
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

-1Shots per match-1
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
-1Shots on target-1
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
-20%Shot conversion-80%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
-1%Possession-1%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
0xG for0
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
0xG against0
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin

Shooting quality

Chadormalu SC: BalancedShams Azar Qazvin: Balanced
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
Accuracy (shots on target)0%0%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.000.00
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shams Azar Qazvin is 150% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Chadormalu SC · 1 pts / match - Shams Azar Qazvin

Chadormalu SC
LDLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W40% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 at home
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Shams Azar Qazvin
LDLWD
Season result split
20% W40% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 away
1-1-0
DW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shams Azar Qazvin is 300% better for: goals scored per match.

0.2 goals / match - Chadormalu SC · 0.8 goals / match - Shams Azar Qazvin

Shams Azar Qazvin is 60% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.6 goals / match - Chadormalu SC · 1 goals / match - Shams Azar Qazvin

Chadormalu SC scoring profile: more difficult

Chadormalu SC scores in 20% of matches (1 of 5 matches), while Shams Azar Qazvin keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).

Shams Azar Qazvin scoring profile: strong

Shams Azar Qazvin scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Chadormalu SC keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

1Goals scored (season)4
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
8Goals conceded (season)5
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
1.8Average goals in match1.8
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
1Goals scored (last 5)4
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin

How often they score at least...

20%1 goal60%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
0%2 goals20%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
0%3 goals0%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
0%4 goals0%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal60%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
60%2 goals40%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
20%3 goals0%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
0%4 goals0%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

30%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time20%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
0%Scored in both halves20%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
20%BTTS - last 540%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

40%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chadormalu SC - half-time state
20% leading60% draw20% trailing
Shams Azar Qazvin - half-time state
20% leading60% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per match (1st half)1.2
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
0.2Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
0.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
0.4Average goals (1st half)1
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
80%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
80%No goal before half-time60%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin

After half-time (2nd half)

0.2Points per match (2nd half)1.2
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
0Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
1.4Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
1.4Average goals (2nd half)0.8
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
20%Clean sheet after half-time60%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin
100%No goal after half-time60%
Chadormalu SCShams Azar Qazvin

Chadormalu SC - second-half results

0% W20% D80% L
6
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.2

Concedes 1.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shams Azar Qazvin - second-half results

20% W60% D20% L
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Chadormalu SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.20
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.21.4
Average goals in match0.41.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference0-7
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Shams Azar Qazvin - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chadormalu SC
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
3
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Shams Azar Qazvin
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.80
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.6 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
30%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+122%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
12%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
32%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chadormalu SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.60
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
21%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
198%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Shams Azar Qazvin

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.80
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).

Teams vs league

Chadormalu SCLigaShams Azar Qazvin
Average goals in match• 1.801.74• 1.80
Both teams scored▼ 20%30%▲ 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 20%19%• 20%
Clean sheets▼ 20%46%▼ 40%
Goal before half-time▼ 40%53%▲ 60%
Goal after half-time▲ 80%62%▼ 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.74
Average goals per match
30%
Both teams scored
19%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
46%
Clean sheets
0.94
Home goals / match
0.81
Away goals / match
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Chadormalu SCGoalRenny Sinisterra

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Chadormalu SC 0 - 2 - 0 Shams Azar Qazvin. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Chadormalu SC
0 : 0
Shams Azar Qazvin
Shams Azar Qazvin
4 : 4
Chadormalu SC

FAQ

What was the result of Chadormalu SC vs Shams Azar Qazvin?

The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Chadormalu SC 1:0 Shams Azar Qazvin. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Chadormalu SC and Shams Azar Qazvin?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Chadormalu SC won 0, Shams Azar Qazvin won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Chadormalu SC vs Shams Azar Qazvin?

Chadormalu SC score 0.20 goals per game on average and Shams Azar Qazvin 0.80. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 19% of games. Both teams score in 20% of Chadormalu SC's matches and 40% of Shams Azar Qazvin's.

What form are Chadormalu SC and Shams Azar Qazvin in?

Over the last 5 games Chadormalu SC have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Shams Azar Qazvin 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chadormalu SC vs Shams Azar Qazvin?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Chadormalu SC vs Shams Azar Qazvin: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.