Charleston Battery vs Detroit City FC: match statistics
Charleston Battery vs Detroit City FC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Charleston Battery played Detroit City FC in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 30 May 2026. Venue: MUSC Health Stadium. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Charleston Battery: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Detroit City FC: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Charleston Battery scores 1.33 and concedes 1.44 goals per match. Detroit City FC scores 1.20 and concedes 0.80. League average: 2.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Charleston Battery 33%, Detroit City FC 50%. Over 2.5: Charleston Battery 56%, Detroit City FC 60%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Charleston Battery has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.49. Charleston Battery: 12.2 shots per match, Detroit City FC: 12.9.
Match halves
Charleston Battery: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.78. Detroit City FC: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.80.
Goals by minute
Charleston Battery: 31-45+ (3 goals). Detroit City FC: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 1-2-2. Average goals 2.60, BTTS 60%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Charleston Battery score an average of 2.5 goals per home match, have an xG of 2.04 and average 7 shots on target, translating to 12 goals this season and 10 goals in the last 5 matches. Detroit City score only 0.6 goals per away match, have an xG of 1.38, 3.2 shots on target and as many as 40% of matches without scoring, while their away goal difference stands at -3. Defensively the hosts concede 1.0 goal at home on average with xG against 0.97, whereas the visitors concede 1.2 goals away with xG against 1.4, so Charleston allows fewer high-quality chances. Although Detroit are higher in the table (4th vs 15th), the hosts have 3 wins in the last 5 matches and very strong home efficiency (Home Win% 75% and Home Loss% 0%), while the visitors are weaker away (Away Win% 0% and Away Loss% 60%). Considering Charleston’s advantage in xG (2.04 vs 1.38), shots on target (7 vs 3.2) and clean-sheet rate (0% vs 40% of matches without a goal), I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Charleston at home averages 1.8 goals scored and only 0.4 conceded, with a 60% clean sheet rate this season, which strongly favors No Goal from visitors. Detroit away scores 0.6 on average, records 3.2 shots on target and a conversion rate of only 5%, so their realistic chance of scoring is low despite created chances. xG is 1.56 for Charleston versus 1.38 for Detroit, while xG against is 1.03 (Charleston) and 1.40 (Detroit), indicating mixed signals in chance creation but Detroit’s poor finishing reduces the likelihood of a goal. In the last 5 matches BTTS for the home side occurred only 20% versus 60% for Detroit, and Charleston in that period averaged 2.0 scored and 1.2 conceded, therefore I ultimately assign a higher probability to the No (no BTTS) scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Charleston has a seasonal goals-per-game average of 1.8 with xG 1.56, while Detroit scores only 0.6 goals per game despite xG 1.38; additionally Detroit concedes 1.2 goals per game on average, which favors a higher total for Charleston. In the last 5 matches Charleston averages 2.0 goals and 80% of games with Over 2.5 goals, while Detroit in its last 5 matches averages 1.2 goals and 60% of games Over 2.5, which together increases the probability of the over. Considering shot conversion rates of 13% for Charleston versus 5% for Detroit and the xG comparison (1.56 vs 1.38) I estimate expected goals at 1.65 for Charleston and 0.95 for Detroit (total 2.60). As a result the strongest signal is Over 2.5 (approx. 68% probability); Over 1.5 is very likely (~85%), while Over 3.5 is unlikely (~22%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistical analysis indicates the most probable scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1) — I assign it a 48% probability. Charleston led at the break in 2 of 5 matches (40%) and were level at half-time in 3 of 5 (60%), and they score an average of 0.8 goals before the interval versus 0.0 for Detroit, which favors a draw in the first half. The home side win 100% of their home matches, average 1.8 goals scored at home and concede 0.4, with xG of 1.56 versus 1.38 for the visitors; additionally they record more shots on target (4.4 vs 3.2) and better conversion rate (13% vs 5%), supporting a final victory for the hosts. In second halves Charleston won 80% of the time and scored an average of 1.0 goals while conceding 0.2, which is why I increased the probability for X/1 (48%) and 1/1 (36%), whereas scenarios beginning with the visitors leading at the break were given 0% due to the absence of such half-time performances.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Charleston Battery | Detroit City FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Detroit City FC is 75% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Charleston Battery · 1.4 pts / match - Detroit City FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Charleston Battery is 11% better for: goals scored per match.
1.33 goals / match - Charleston Battery · 1.2 goals / match - Detroit City FC
Detroit City FC is 80% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.44 goals / match - Charleston Battery · 0.8 goals / match - Detroit City FC
Charleston Battery scores in 56% of matches (5 of 9 matches), while Detroit City FC keeps a clean sheet in 50% (5 of 10 matches).
Detroit City FC scores in 80% of matches (8 of 10 matches), while Charleston Battery keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Charleston Battery
Over / Under - Detroit City FC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Charleston Battery is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.44 pts / match - Charleston Battery · 1.2 pts / match - Detroit City FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Charleston Battery - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Detroit City FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Charleston Battery
Detroit City FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Charleston Battery | Liga | Detroit City FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.78 | 2.79 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 56% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 56% | 55% | ▲ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 27% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 56% | 69% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 81% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Charleston Battery 1 - 2 - 2 Detroit City FC. Average goals 2.60, both teams scored in 60% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Charleston Battery vs Detroit City FC?
The USL Championship match finished Charleston Battery 2:0 Detroit City FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Charleston Battery and Detroit City FC?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Charleston Battery won 1, Detroit City FC won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Charleston Battery vs Detroit City FC?
Charleston Battery score 1.33 goals per game on average and Detroit City FC 1.20. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Charleston Battery's matches and 50% of Detroit City FC's.
What form are Charleston Battery and Detroit City FC in?
Over the last 5 games Charleston Battery have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Detroit City FC 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Charleston Battery vs Detroit City FC?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.