Charlton Athletic vs Queens Park Rangers: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Charlton Athletic vs Queens Park Rangers: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Charlton Athletic play Queens Park Rangers in Championship (England). The match date is 9 September 2026. Venue: The Valley.
Current form
Charlton Athletic: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Queens Park Rangers: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Charlton Athletic scores 1.20 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Queens Park Rangers scores 1.40 and concedes 0.80. League average: 2.87 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Charlton Athletic 60%, Queens Park Rangers 60%. Over 2.5: Charlton Athletic 60%, Queens Park Rangers 60%. League level: BTTS 67%, Over 2.5 65%.
xG, shots and style
Queens Park Rangers has higher xG: 1.88 vs 1.13. Charlton Athletic: 10.4 shots per match, Queens Park Rangers: 17.2.
Match halves
Charlton Athletic: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.00. Queens Park Rangers: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.60.
Goals by minute
Charlton Athletic: 46-60 (2 goals). Queens Park Rangers: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Championship: 2.87 goals per match, BTTS 67%, Over 2.5 65%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Charlton Athletic | Queens Park Rangers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Queens Park Rangers is 17% better for: goals scored per match.
1.2 goals / match - Charlton Athletic · 1.4 goals / match - Queens Park Rangers
Queens Park Rangers is 75% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.4 goals / match - Charlton Athletic · 0.8 goals / match - Queens Park Rangers
Charlton Athletic scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Queens Park Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).
Queens Park Rangers scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Charlton Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Charlton Athletic
Over / Under - Queens Park Rangers
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Queens Park Rangers is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Charlton Athletic · 1.6 pts / match - Queens Park Rangers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Charlton Athletic - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Queens Park Rangers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Charlton Athletic
Queens Park Rangers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).
Teams vs league
| Charlton Athletic | Liga | Queens Park Rangers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.60 | 2.87 | ▼ 2.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 60% | 67% | ▼ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 60% | 65% | ▼ 60% |
| Clean sheets | • 20% | 21% | • 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 80% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 75% | ▼ 40% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Charlton Athletic 0 - 1 - 1 Queens Park Rangers. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
When do Charlton Athletic and Queens Park Rangers play?
Charlton Athletic face Queens Park Rangers on 9 September 2026 in Championship at The Valley. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Charlton Athletic and Queens Park Rangers?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Charlton Athletic won 0, Queens Park Rangers won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Charlton Athletic vs Queens Park Rangers?
Charlton Athletic score 1.20 goals per game on average and Queens Park Rangers 1.40. The Championship average is 2.87 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Charlton Athletic's matches and 60% of Queens Park Rangers's.
What form are Charlton Athletic and Queens Park Rangers in?
Over the last 5 games Charlton Athletic have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Queens Park Rangers 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Charlton Athletic vs Queens Park Rangers?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Charlton Athletic vs Queens Park Rangers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.