United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 31 August 2026

Chattanooga FC vs Carolina Core: match statistics

Chattanooga FC crest
Chattanooga FC
5 : 2half-time 1:0
Carolina Core crest
Carolina Core

Chattanooga FC vs Carolina Core: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chattanooga FC played Carolina Core in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 29 August 2026. Final score: 5:2.

Current form

Chattanooga FC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Carolina Core: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chattanooga FC scores 1.83 and concedes 1.46 goals per match. Carolina Core scores 1.38 and concedes 1.79. League average: 3.29 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chattanooga FC 63%, Carolina Core 67%. Over 2.5: Chattanooga FC 58%, Carolina Core 63%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

Chattanooga FC has higher xG: 1.68 vs 1.51. Chattanooga FC: 13.9 shots per match, Carolina Core: 12.8.

Match halves

Chattanooga FC: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 0.88. Carolina Core: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Chattanooga FC: 31-45+ (11 goals). Carolina Core: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.29 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 3-2-0. Average goals 1.80, BTTS 40%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chattanooga FC have a clearly superior season record: they have won 11 of 24 matches and sit 8th, while Carolina Core have just 5 victories and are 24th in the table. The hosts win 67% of their home matches, score an average of 2.00 goals and lose in only 17% of cases, whereas the visitors have not recorded a single away win. Chattanooga’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created: their average home xG stands at 1.71 compared with Carolina Core’s 1.32 away from home, while the hosts boast a significantly stronger defense, conceding 1.00 goal per match compared with 2.18 for the visitors. Carolina Core fail to score in 36% of away matches and have kept a clean sheet in only 18% of their away fixtures, which should favor an effective performance from Chattanooga. Recent form also supports the hosts, who have won 3 of their last 5 matches and conceded just 5 goals in that run.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The seasonal BTTS rate stands at 69% for Chattanooga and 64% for Carolina Core, which is at least in line with the league average of 62%. The hosts have not recorded a single match without scoring, while Carolina Core have kept a clean sheet in only 18% of their games, conceding an average of 2.18 goals per match. Carolina Core have recently been scoring 2.2 goals per game and creating chances worth 1.81 xG, while Chattanooga allow opponents 1.50 xG. The hosts also have a solid basis for scoring, averaging 1.8 goals and 1.72 xG across their last five matches, while their opponents conceded 2.2 goals per game during this period. Chattanooga’s lower 40% BTTS rate in their last five appearances and defensive improvement to 1.0 goals conceded reduce confidence, but the weight of the data still points towards BTTS - Yes. In other words, both teams are expected to score, rather than BTTS - No, which only requires at least one team to fail to score and does not automatically mean a 0:0 draw or that neither side will score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Chattanooga score an average of 1.62 goals at home, while Carolina Core concede as many as 2.18 goals away from home, clearly favoring at least two goals in the match. Their attacking potential is supported by average xG figures of 1.66 for the hosts and 1.32 for the visitors, with opponents recording 1.64 and 1.74 xG respectively. In their last five matches, the teams averaged 1.8 and 2.2 goals scored, while Carolina Core conceded 2.2 goals per game during this period. The 1.5 line was covered in 92% of Chattanooga’s matches and 73% of Carolina’s, making Over 1.5 the strongest pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Chattanooga FC have a clear season-long advantage: they score 1.62 goals per match and concede 1.46, while Carolina Core concede as many as 2.18 goals and have not won a single game. The hosts were leading at the break in 38% of matches, compared with just 9% for the visitors, while Carolina Core were trailing at half-time in 55% of their appearances. Chattanooga’s superiority is also evident in the quality of chances created: their average xG stands at 1.66 versus the opponents’ 1.32, and the home side records 4.92 shots on target per match compared with 4.00 for the visitors. After the break, Chattanooga average 0.92 goals scored and concede just 0.69, which supports them in maintaining an early lead against Carolina, who have lost 64% of their matches this season.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
4 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
22Shots10
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
10Shots on target6
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
2.44xG1.47
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
9Corners4
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
50Dangerous attacks57
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
7Fouls12
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
2Cards2
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
1.83Goals scored / match1.38
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
1.46Goals conceded / match1.79
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
46%Average possession47%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
5.67Shots on target / match4.5
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.92Shots per match12.75
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
5.67Shots on target4.5
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
13.2%Shot conversion10.8%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
46%Possession47%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
1.68xG for1.51
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
1.45xG against1.68
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core

Shooting quality

Chattanooga FC: Counter-attackingCarolina Core: Balanced
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
Accuracy (shots on target)41%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chattanooga FC is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Chattanooga FC · 1.4 pts / match - Carolina Core

Chattanooga FC
WWWDL
Season result split
46% W29% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-7-6
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-2-2
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
DWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.72Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Carolina Core
WLDWL
Season result split
21% W33% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-8-11
0.96 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-4-7
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chattanooga FC is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.83 goals / match - Chattanooga FC · 1.38 goals / match - Carolina Core

Chattanooga FC is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.46 goals / match - Chattanooga FC · 1.79 goals / match - Carolina Core

Chattanooga FC scoring profile: very strong

Chattanooga FC scores in 92% of matches (22 of 24 matches), while Carolina Core keeps a clean sheet in 25% (6 of 24 matches).

Carolina Core scoring profile: very strong

Carolina Core scores in 83% of matches (20 of 24 matches), while Chattanooga FC keeps a clean sheet in 29% (7 of 24 matches).

44Goals scored (season)33
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
35Goals conceded (season)43
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
3.29Average goals in match3.17
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
9Goals scored (last 5)11
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
5Goals conceded (last 5)11
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core

How often they score at least...

92%1 goal83%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
50%2 goals42%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
25%3 goals8%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
17%4 goals4%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal75%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
42%2 goals54%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
17%3 goals38%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
13%4 goals8%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time21%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
8%BTTS in both halves4%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
33%Scored in both halves21%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS54%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
40%BTTS - last 560%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time54%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chattanooga FC is 61% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / match - Chattanooga FC · 1.04 pts / match - Carolina Core

Chattanooga FC - half-time state
46% leading29% draw25% trailing
Carolina Core - half-time state
25% leading29% draw46% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per match (1st half)1.04
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
0.96Goals scored (1st half)0.58
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.96
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
1.46Average goals (1st half)1.54
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
58%Clean sheet before half-time38%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
38%No goal before half-time58%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1.38
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
0.88Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
0.96Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
1.83Average goals (2nd half)1.63
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
46%Clean sheet after half-time54%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core
38%No goal after half-time38%
Chattanooga FCCarolina Core

Chattanooga FC - second-half results

38% W25% R38% P
40
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Carolina Core - second-half results

33% W38% R29% P
25
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding84%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 21%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Chattanooga FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.20
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Carolina Core - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match1.21.0
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match2.42.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chattanooga FC
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
6
5
16-30
11
3
31-45
8
8
46-60
6
8
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Carolina Core
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
2
9
16-30
9
9
31-45
8
6
46-60
4
6
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.23
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-44%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
76%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chattanooga FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Carolina Core

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Chattanooga FCLigaCarolina Core
Average goals in match 3.293.29 3.17
Both teams scored 63%62% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%66% 63%
Clean sheets 29%21% 25%
Goal before half-time 79%76% 83%
Goal after half-time 88%84% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.29
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.88
Home goals / match
1.41
Away goals / match
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Carolina CoreSubstitutionOn: Corey LundeenOff: Ricardo Montenegro
  2. Chattanooga FCGoalAlexander Ian KrehlAssist: Alexis Leonel Arrúa
  3. Chattanooga FCGoalIsaiah JonesAssist: Nathan Koehler
  4. Carolina CoreSubstitutionOn: David DiazOff: Arnaud Tattevin
  5. Chattanooga FCYellow cardYves Tcheuyap
  6. Chattanooga FCYellow cardAlexander Ian Krehl
  7. Carolina CoreYellow cardNelson Martinez
  8. Chattanooga FCGoalTate Boswell Robertson
  9. Chattanooga FCSubstitutionOn: Yuval CohenOff: Alexander Ian Krehl
  10. Chattanooga FCSubstitutionOn: Luke HusakiwskyOff: Isaiah Jones
  11. Carolina CoreGoalDavid DiazAssist: Ricks Ford
  12. Chattanooga FCSubstitutionOn: Alex McGrathOff: Yves Tcheuyap
  13. Carolina CoreYellow cardCorey Lundeen

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Chattanooga FC 3 - 2 - 0 Carolina Core. Average goals 1.80, both teams scored in 40% matches.

Carolina Core
1 : 1
Chattanooga FC
Chattanooga FC
1 : 0
Carolina Core
Chattanooga FC
0 : 0
Carolina Core FC
Carolina Core FC
0 : 1
Chattanooga FC
Carolina Core FC
1 : 4
Chattanooga FC

FAQ

What was the result of Chattanooga FC vs Carolina Core?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Chattanooga FC 5:2 Carolina Core. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Chattanooga FC and Carolina Core?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Chattanooga FC won 3, Carolina Core won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Chattanooga FC vs Carolina Core?

Chattanooga FC score 1.83 goals per game on average and Carolina Core 1.38. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.29 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Chattanooga FC's matches and 67% of Carolina Core's.

What form are Chattanooga FC and Carolina Core in?

Over the last 5 games Chattanooga FC have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Carolina Core 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chattanooga FC vs Carolina Core?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.