Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Union Omaha: match statistics
Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Union Omaha: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chattanooga Red Wolves played Union Omaha in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 8 August 2026. Venue: David Stanton Field At CCS. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Chattanooga Red Wolves: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Union Omaha: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.88 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. Union Omaha scores 1.63 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.88 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chattanooga Red Wolves 56%, Union Omaha 58%. Over 2.5: Chattanooga Red Wolves 63%, Union Omaha 58%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Union Omaha has higher xG: 1.88 vs 1.47. Chattanooga Red Wolves: 12.1 shots per match, Union Omaha: 15.9.
Match halves
Chattanooga Red Wolves: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 1.00. Union Omaha: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 1.05.
Goals by minute
Chattanooga Red Wolves: 46-60 (7 goals). Union Omaha: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL League One: 2.88 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chattanooga Red Wolves are very strong at home: they have won 75% of their matches, averaging 2.00 goals scored and just 0.63 goals conceded per game. Union Omaha lead the table and have scored 12 goals while conceding 8 in their last five matches, but they win only 50% of their away games and lose 50% of them. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in 63% of their home matches, while the visitors have failed to score in 40% of their away games and kept a clean sheet in only 10%. Omaha create more chances away from home, as reflected by an xG of 1.62 compared with Red Wolves’ 1.43, but the hosts are significantly more clinical in front of goal, converting 18% of their shots compared with 9% for their opponents. Chattanooga’s defensive edge and consistency at home point to a narrow victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Chattanooga Red Wolves score an average of 2.11 goals at home with an xG of 2.17, while Union Omaha concede an average of 1.20 goals away from home and keep a clean sheet in only 10% of matches. The visitors also have solid foundations for scoring, with an average xG of 1.62, while the hosts allow opponents an xG of 1.08 and have failed to keep a clean sheet in 33% of matches. In their last five appearances, Union Omaha scored an average of 2.4 goals, while Red Wolves conceded 1.8, which clearly strengthens the likelihood of an away goal. The recent defensive form of both sides is less stable than their season-long figures: the hosts conceded 9 goals and the visitors 8 in their last five matches. BTTS - Yes occurred in 67% of Chattanooga’s matches and in 80% of Union Omaha’s last five games, making a Goal/Goal outcome more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Chattanooga Red Wolves average 2.11 goals at home, while Union Omaha concede 1.20 goals away and keep a clean sheet in only 10% of their matches. The hosts create a high volume of chances, as reflected by an average of 2.17 xG, 18.44 shots, and 6.89 shots on target per game. The 1.5-goal line has been covered in 89% of Chattanooga’s matches and 80% of Union Omaha’s, providing an exceptionally consistent signal for at least two goals. Current form also points to goals: in their last five matches, Union Omaha have scored 12 and conceded 8 goals, while Chattanooga have scored 8 but allowed their opponents to find the net 9 times. Over 1.5 offers the greatest edge, as the hosts’ high offensive potential and the visitors’ weaker defence significantly reduce the likelihood of a match finishing with no more than one goal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as Chattanooga were level at the break in 56% of their matches and Union Omaha in 67%, with averages of just 1.00 and 1.11 goals scored in the first halves, respectively. The home side’s advantage should emerge after the interval: they score an average of 1.78 goals and concede only 0.33, whereas Union Omaha score just 0.44 goals after half-time and allow opponents 0.89. Chattanooga also have a clearly superior full-season record: 78% wins and no defeats, compared with the visitors’ 50% win rate and 50% loss rate. The hosts’ attacking potential is further supported by an xG of 2.17, while Omaha concede 1.61 xG, and Chattanooga average 6.89 shots on target compared with the opponents’ 4.70. The visitors’ recent form over their last five matches, in which they scored 2.4 goals per game, increases the risk of a late turnaround in their favour, but the second-half profile most strongly supports the X/1 HT/FT outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chattanooga Red Wolves | Union Omaha | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Union Omaha is 11% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 2 pts / match - Union Omaha
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 15% better for: goals scored per match.
1.88 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.63 goals / match - Union Omaha
Union Omaha is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.38 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.11 goals / match - Union Omaha
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 88% of matches (14 of 16 matches), while Union Omaha keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 matches).
Union Omaha scores in 79% of matches (15 of 19 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Over / Under - Union Omaha
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.38 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.11 pts / match - Union Omaha
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Union Omaha - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chattanooga Red Wolves
Union Omaha
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Chattanooga Red Wolves | Liga | Union Omaha | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.25 | 2.88 | ▼ 2.74 |
| Both teams scored | • 56% | 55% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 63% | 60% | ▼ 58% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 26% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 70% | ▼ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 78% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Chattanooga Red Wolves 0 - 1 - 2 Union Omaha. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Union Omaha?
The USL League One match finished Chattanooga Red Wolves 1:3 Union Omaha. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Chattanooga Red Wolves and Union Omaha?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Chattanooga Red Wolves won 0, Union Omaha won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Union Omaha?
Chattanooga Red Wolves score 1.88 goals per game on average and Union Omaha 1.63. The USL League One average is 2.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's matches and 58% of Union Omaha's.
What form are Chattanooga Red Wolves and Union Omaha in?
Over the last 5 games Chattanooga Red Wolves have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Union Omaha 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Union Omaha?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Union Omaha: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


