Cheongju vs Seoul E-Land: match statistics
Cheongju vs Seoul E-Land: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Cheongju played Seoul E-Land in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 4 September 2026. Venue: Cheongju Stadium. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Cheongju: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Seoul E-Land: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Cheongju scores 1.17 and concedes 1.61 goals per match. Seoul E-Land scores 1.78 and concedes 1.22. League average: 2.72 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Cheongju 78%, Seoul E-Land 70%. Over 2.5: Cheongju 57%, Seoul E-Land 70%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Seoul E-Land has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.44. Cheongju: 11.9 shots per match, Seoul E-Land: 14.1.
Match halves
Cheongju: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.70. Seoul E-Land: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 1.22.
Goals by minute
Cheongju: 76-90+ (9 goals). Seoul E-Land: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 3-0-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Seoul E-Land sit 3rd, while Cheongju are only 13th, and the visitors’ overall season record stands at 12 wins and 5 defeats, compared with just 3 victories for the hosts. The visitors are unbeaten in their last five matches, collecting 9 points and conceding only 4 goals, whereas Cheongju have taken 5 points and conceded 9 goals over the same period. Away from home, Seoul E-Land win 50% of their matches, score an average of 1.50 goals and concede just 1.00, while Cheongju concede as many as 1.75 goals per home game. The hosts do post a slightly higher average home xG, 1.59 compared with the visitors’ 1.57 away from home, but Seoul E-Land record more shots on target per match (5.00 to 4.33) and have a clearly superior conversion rate, 12% compared with 9%. Cheongju’s high home draw rate of 50% increases the likelihood of a share of the points, but the visitors’ more stable defence and current unbeaten run point towards an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Cheongju records BTTS in 82% of league matches, well above the league average of 63%, while the rate of both teams scoring in their last five games stood at 80%. The hosts have not been held scoreless in any match this season, averaging 2.09 goals and creating chances worth 1.75 xG, so they are highly likely to score even against the opponents’ more solid defence. Seoul E-Land average 1.50 goals, and over their last five appearances they generated a high 1.83 xG per match, while Cheongju conceded 1.8 goals per game during that period. The visitors do have a 33% clean-sheet rate and conceded just 0.8 goals per match in their last five games, but their current BTTS rate of 80%, combined with the hosts’ weaker defence, strengthens the case for goals at both ends. BTTS - Yes is therefore the most likely outcome, although Seoul E-Land’s recent defensive organisation limits confidence in the pick.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as Cheongju matches have featured at least 2 goals in 91% of cases, compared with 75% for Seoul E-Land matches. The hosts average 1.75 xG, while the visitors concede an average of 1.39 xG, supporting the scenario of a Cheongju goal despite their weaker recent finishing. Seoul E-Land create an average of 1.57 xG, rising to 1.83 xG across their last five matches, while Cheongju have conceded 1.45 xG over the same period. Both teams have also recorded BTTS in 80% of their last five matches, and Cheongju conceded 9 goals during that span, averaging 1.8 per game. The projected total of 2.86 goals gives a clear edge to Over 1.5, although the visitors’ strong recent defensive record of conceding just 0.8 goals per match limits confidence in higher lines.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal for the first half is a draw: Seoul E-Land were level at half-time in 9 of their 12 league matches this season, or 75%, and in each of their last five games they went into the break with the score undecided. The visitors average just 0.33 goals before half-time, compared with 0.82 for the hosts, but Seoul E-Land concede only 0.42 goals in this phase, limiting Cheongju’s chances of building a lead at the break. After the interval, the visitors have greater scoring potential: they won the second half in 57% of their matches and averaged 1.17 goals in those periods, while conceding only 0.58. Current form also favours Seoul E-Land, who are unbeaten in their last five matches, average 1.8 points per game and concede 0.8 goals, whereas Cheongju have conceded an average of 1.8 goals over the same period. Therefore, the most likely outcome is a cagey draw at half-time, followed by a turnaround in favour of the visitors after a more intense second half.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Cheongju | Seoul E-Land | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Seoul E-Land is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Cheongju · 1.8 pts / match - Seoul E-Land
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Seoul E-Land is 52% better for: goals scored per match.
1.17 goals / match - Cheongju · 1.78 goals / match - Seoul E-Land
Seoul E-Land is 32% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.61 goals / match - Cheongju · 1.22 goals / match - Seoul E-Land
Cheongju scores in 83% of matches (19 of 23 matches), while Seoul E-Land keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 matches).
Seoul E-Land scores in 87% of matches (20 of 23 matches), while Cheongju keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cheongju
Over / Under - Seoul E-Land
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Seoul E-Land is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.26 pts / match - Cheongju · 1.35 pts / match - Seoul E-Land
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cheongju - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Seoul E-Land - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Cheongju
Seoul E-Land
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Cheongju | Liga | Seoul E-Land | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.78 | 2.72 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 78% | 63% | ▲ 70% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 54% | ▲ 70% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 22% | ▲ 26% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 70% | 68% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 78% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Cheongju 3 - 0 - 1 Seoul E-Land. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Cheongju vs Seoul E-Land?
The K League 2 match finished Cheongju 0:2 Seoul E-Land. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Cheongju and Seoul E-Land?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Cheongju won 3, Seoul E-Land won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Cheongju vs Seoul E-Land?
Cheongju score 1.17 goals per game on average and Seoul E-Land 1.78. The K League 2 average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 78% of Cheongju's matches and 70% of Seoul E-Land's.
What form are Cheongju and Seoul E-Land in?
Over the last 5 games Cheongju have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Seoul E-Land 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cheongju vs Seoul E-Land?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Cheongju vs Seoul E-Land: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


