South Korea - K League 2Cheongju StadiumData current as of 17 October 2026

Cheongju vs Seoul E-Land: match statistics

Cheongju crest
Cheongju
0 : 2half-time 0:2
Seoul E-Land crest
Seoul E-Land

Cheongju vs Seoul E-Land: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cheongju played Seoul E-Land in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 4 September 2026. Venue: Cheongju Stadium. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Cheongju: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Seoul E-Land: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cheongju scores 1.17 and concedes 1.61 goals per match. Seoul E-Land scores 1.78 and concedes 1.22. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cheongju 78%, Seoul E-Land 70%. Over 2.5: Cheongju 57%, Seoul E-Land 70%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Seoul E-Land has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.44. Cheongju: 11.9 shots per match, Seoul E-Land: 14.1.

Match halves

Cheongju: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.70. Seoul E-Land: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 1.22.

Goals by minute

Cheongju: 76-90+ (9 goals). Seoul E-Land: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 3-0-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Seoul E-Land sit 3rd, while Cheongju are only 13th, and the visitors’ overall season record stands at 12 wins and 5 defeats, compared with just 3 victories for the hosts. The visitors are unbeaten in their last five matches, collecting 9 points and conceding only 4 goals, whereas Cheongju have taken 5 points and conceded 9 goals over the same period. Away from home, Seoul E-Land win 50% of their matches, score an average of 1.50 goals and concede just 1.00, while Cheongju concede as many as 1.75 goals per home game. The hosts do post a slightly higher average home xG, 1.59 compared with the visitors’ 1.57 away from home, but Seoul E-Land record more shots on target per match (5.00 to 4.33) and have a clearly superior conversion rate, 12% compared with 9%. Cheongju’s high home draw rate of 50% increases the likelihood of a share of the points, but the visitors’ more stable defence and current unbeaten run point towards an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Cheongju records BTTS in 82% of league matches, well above the league average of 63%, while the rate of both teams scoring in their last five games stood at 80%. The hosts have not been held scoreless in any match this season, averaging 2.09 goals and creating chances worth 1.75 xG, so they are highly likely to score even against the opponents’ more solid defence. Seoul E-Land average 1.50 goals, and over their last five appearances they generated a high 1.83 xG per match, while Cheongju conceded 1.8 goals per game during that period. The visitors do have a 33% clean-sheet rate and conceded just 0.8 goals per match in their last five games, but their current BTTS rate of 80%, combined with the hosts’ weaker defence, strengthens the case for goals at both ends. BTTS - Yes is therefore the most likely outcome, although Seoul E-Land’s recent defensive organisation limits confidence in the pick.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as Cheongju matches have featured at least 2 goals in 91% of cases, compared with 75% for Seoul E-Land matches. The hosts average 1.75 xG, while the visitors concede an average of 1.39 xG, supporting the scenario of a Cheongju goal despite their weaker recent finishing. Seoul E-Land create an average of 1.57 xG, rising to 1.83 xG across their last five matches, while Cheongju have conceded 1.45 xG over the same period. Both teams have also recorded BTTS in 80% of their last five matches, and Cheongju conceded 9 goals during that span, averaging 1.8 per game. The projected total of 2.86 goals gives a clear edge to Over 1.5, although the visitors’ strong recent defensive record of conceding just 0.8 goals per match limits confidence in higher lines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal for the first half is a draw: Seoul E-Land were level at half-time in 9 of their 12 league matches this season, or 75%, and in each of their last five games they went into the break with the score undecided. The visitors average just 0.33 goals before half-time, compared with 0.82 for the hosts, but Seoul E-Land concede only 0.42 goals in this phase, limiting Cheongju’s chances of building a lead at the break. After the interval, the visitors have greater scoring potential: they won the second half in 57% of their matches and averaged 1.17 goals in those periods, while conceding only 0.58. Current form also favours Seoul E-Land, who are unbeaten in their last five matches, average 1.8 points per game and concede 0.8 goals, whereas Cheongju have conceded an average of 1.8 goals over the same period. Therefore, the most likely outcome is a cagey draw at half-time, followed by a turnaround in favour of the visitors after a more intense second half.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
7Shots11
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
1Shots on target6
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
0.93xG1.74
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
2Corners11
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
57Dangerous attacks87
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
7Fouls8
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
0Cards2
CheongjuSeoul E-Land

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.17Goals scored / match1.78
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
1.61Goals conceded / match1.22
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
56%Average possession52%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
3.96Shots on target / match5.48
CheongjuSeoul E-Land

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.87Shots per match14.09
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
3.96Shots on target5.48
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
9.9%Shot conversion12.7%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
56%Possession52%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
1.44xG for1.69
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
1.34xG against1.23
CheongjuSeoul E-Land

Shooting quality

Cheongju: BalancedSeoul E-Land: Attacking
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
Accuracy (shots on target)33%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Seoul E-Land is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Cheongju · 1.8 pts / match - Seoul E-Land

Cheongju
DLWDL
Season result split
13% W61% D26% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-14-6
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-6-4
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
LWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Seoul E-Land
WDWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
52% W26% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-6-5
1.83 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-2
Last 5 away
2-3-0
WDWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.94Opponent xG: 0.97BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Seoul E-Land is 52% better for: goals scored per match.

1.17 goals / match - Cheongju · 1.78 goals / match - Seoul E-Land

Seoul E-Land is 32% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.61 goals / match - Cheongju · 1.22 goals / match - Seoul E-Land

Cheongju scoring profile: very strong

Cheongju scores in 83% of matches (19 of 23 matches), while Seoul E-Land keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 matches).

Seoul E-Land scoring profile: very strong

Seoul E-Land scores in 87% of matches (20 of 23 matches), while Cheongju keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).

27Goals scored (season)41
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
37Goals conceded (season)28
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
2.78Average goals in match3
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
6Goals scored (last 5)7
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
9Goals conceded (last 5)4
CheongjuSeoul E-Land

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal87%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
35%2 goals57%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
0%3 goals30%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
0%4 goals4%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal74%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
48%2 goals35%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
17%3 goals13%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
9%4 goals0%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time26%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
4%BTTS in both halves4%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
22%Scored in both halves35%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS61%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
80%BTTS - last 580%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time70%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
39%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Seoul E-Land is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.26 pts / match - Cheongju · 1.35 pts / match - Seoul E-Land

Cheongju - half-time state
26% leading48% draw26% trailing
Seoul E-Land - half-time state
26% leading57% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.26Points per match (1st half)1.35
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
0.48Goals scored (1st half)0.57
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
1.04Average goals (1st half)1
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
57%Clean sheet before half-time57%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
52%No goal before half-time52%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land

After half-time (2nd half)

0.91Points per match (2nd half)1.87
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
0.7Goals scored (2nd half)1.22
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
1.04Goals conceded (2nd half)0.78
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
1.74Average goals (2nd half)2
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
35%Clean sheet after half-time43%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land
43%No goal after half-time26%
CheongjuSeoul E-Land

Cheongju - second-half results

17% W39% D43% L
29
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.26
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Seoul E-Land - second-half results

52% W30% D17% L
31
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cheongju - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Seoul E-Land - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.41.8
1 goal20%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cheongju
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
4
2
16-30
6
7
31-45
5
6
46-60
2
5
61-75
9
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Seoul E-Land
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
5
4
16-30
5
3
31-45
7
4
46-60
9
4
61-75
12
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.89
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
74%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-13%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
72%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cheongju

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Seoul E-Land

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
135%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

CheongjuLigaSeoul E-Land
Average goals in match• 2.782.72▲ 3.00
Both teams scored▲ 78%63%▲ 70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 57%54%▲ 70%
Clean sheets▼ 17%22%▲ 26%
Goal before half-time▲ 70%68%▼ 65%
Goal after half-time▼ 74%78%▲ 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.41
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Seoul E-LandYellow cardChang-Hwan Park
  2. Seoul E-LandGoalJoo-wan AnAssist: Osmar Barba Ibáñez
  3. CheongjuSubstitutionOn: Jae-Won SeoOff: Jong-Eon Lee
  4. Seoul E-LandYellow cardSeok-Joo Yoon
  5. Seoul E-LandSubstitutionOn: Seok-Jun HongOff: Joo-wan An
  6. Seoul E-LandSubstitutionOn: Jun-Hyun JoOff: Alan Lima Cariús
  7. Seoul E-LandSubstitutionOn: Caio Marcelo Pinheiro da SilvaOff: Seok-Joo Yoon

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Cheongju 3 - 0 - 1 Seoul E-Land. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Seoul E-Land
1 : 2
Cheongju
Cheongju FC
0 : 2
Seoul E-Land FC
Cheongju FC
2 : 1
Seoul E-Land FC
Seoul E-Land FC
0 : 2
Cheongju FC

FAQ

What was the result of Cheongju vs Seoul E-Land?

The K League 2 match finished Cheongju 0:2 Seoul E-Land. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cheongju and Seoul E-Land?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Cheongju won 3, Seoul E-Land won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cheongju vs Seoul E-Land?

Cheongju score 1.17 goals per game on average and Seoul E-Land 1.78. The K League 2 average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 78% of Cheongju's matches and 70% of Seoul E-Land's.

What form are Cheongju and Seoul E-Land in?

Over the last 5 games Cheongju have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Seoul E-Land 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cheongju vs Seoul E-Land?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Cheongju vs Seoul E-Land: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.