Chesterfield vs Barnet: match statistics
Chesterfield vs Barnet: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chesterfield played Barnet in EFL League Two (England). The match was played on 5 September 2026. Venue: Technique Stadium. Final score: 3:3.
Current form
Chesterfield: 1-1-2, 1.00 points/match. Barnet: 2-2-0, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chesterfield scores 0.75 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Barnet scores 2.25 and concedes 1.25. League average: 2.60 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chesterfield 50%, Barnet 100%. Over 2.5: Chesterfield 25%, Barnet 75%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Barnet has higher xG: 1.75 vs 1.71. Chesterfield: 15.3 shots per match, Barnet: 14.8.
Match halves
Chesterfield: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.25. Barnet: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.25.
Goals by minute
Chesterfield: 0-15 (1 goals). Barnet: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League Two: 2.60 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Barnet sit 2nd, while Chesterfield are only 16th, and the visitors have won 2 of their 3 league matches without suffering a defeat. Chesterfield have scored just 2 goals this season and failed to find the net in their only home match, despite generating an xG of 1.80. Barnet average 3 goals per away game, convert 20% of their shots, and have yet to finish a match without scoring. The quality of chances also favours the visitors: their average xG against is 1.01, significantly lower than the 1.61 conceded by Chesterfield at home. Barnet have recorded 3 wins and scored 14 goals in their last five matches, making them clear favourites to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal data strongly supports goals for both sides: Chesterfield and Barnet have a BTTS rate of 100%, and neither team has kept a clean sheet yet. The hosts average 2.5 goals scored and 1.5 conceded, while Barnet score as many as 3.0 goals per match and allow opponents 1.0 goal. Their attacking potential is confirmed by the xG figures: 2.00 for Chesterfield and 1.59 for Barnet, while the hosts average 5.5 shots on target. The main risk factor is Chesterfield’s weaker recent finishing, with the team scoring only 0.4 goals in its last 5 matches and recording BTTS in 20% of games. Despite this, Barnet have averaged 2.8 goals scored and 1.4 conceded over the same period, with a BTTS rate of 100%, making a home breakthrough and a goal from both teams the more likely scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as both teams have gone over this line in 100% of their league matches so far, and neither has kept a clean sheet. Barnet are particularly dangerous in attack: they have averaged 2.8 goals scored across their last five matches, with an xG of 1.96, while Chesterfield have conceded 0.8 goals per game during this period. The hosts do have weaker current finishing numbers, averaging 0.4 goals across their last five appearances, but they create chances worth 1.43 xG per match, while Barnet allow opponents 1.31 xG. The seasonal averages of both teams are above the league benchmark of 2.5 goals: Chesterfield matches produce 4.0 goals, and Barnet matches also produce 4.0. The Over 2.5 goals line is also supported by positive indicators, but the hosts’ weaker scoring form reduces its confidence compared with the safer Over 1.5 goals bet.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Barnet are clearly in better current form: over their last five matches, they have averaged 2.8 goals and won 60% of their games, while Chesterfield have scored just 0.4 goals per match and lost 60% of theirs. The visitors were leading at the break in 60% of those appearances and did not trail in any of them, whereas the hosts went into half-time behind in 60% of their matches, scoring only 0.2 goals per game before the interval. Barnet’s advantage is also evident after the break: they average 1.4 goals in second halves, compared with just 0.2 for Chesterfield, while the hosts have failed to win any of their last five second halves. Chesterfield do create more chances in the season-long data, with an xG of 2.00 compared with Barnet’s 1.59 and 5.5 shots on target versus 3.0, but current efficiency and form clearly favour the visitors. The most likely scenario is therefore an HT/FT outcome of 1/1, with Barnet taking the lead at the break and holding it until the final whistle.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chesterfield | Barnet | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.17 | 0.50 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Barnet is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Chesterfield · 2 pts / match - Barnet
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Barnet is 200% better for: goals scored per match.
0.75 goals / match - Chesterfield · 2.25 goals / match - Barnet
Chesterfield is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Chesterfield · 1.25 goals / match - Barnet
Chesterfield scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Barnet keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).
Barnet scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Chesterfield keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chesterfield
Over / Under - Barnet
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Barnet is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - Chesterfield · 2 pts / match - Barnet
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chesterfield - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Barnet - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.50 | 0.75 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 25% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 50% | 75% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.25 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.3 | 2.3 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 25% |
| No goal | 25% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chesterfield
Barnet
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).
Teams vs league
| Chesterfield | Liga | Barnet | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.75 | 2.60 | ▲ 3.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 56% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 25% | 50% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | • 25% | 26% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 74% | • 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 78% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Chesterfield 1 - 0 - 1 Barnet. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Chesterfield vs Barnet?
The EFL League Two match finished Chesterfield 3:3 Barnet. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Chesterfield and Barnet?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Chesterfield won 1, Barnet won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Chesterfield vs Barnet?
Chesterfield score 0.75 goals per game on average and Barnet 2.25. The EFL League Two average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Chesterfield's matches and 100% of Barnet's.
What form are Chesterfield and Barnet in?
Over the last 5 games Chesterfield have a 1-1-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Barnet 2-2-0 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chesterfield vs Barnet?
The statistical background for Chesterfield vs Barnet — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.