Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II: match statistics
Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chicago Fire II played Inter Miami II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 23 August 2026. Venue: SeatGeek Stadium. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Chicago Fire II: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Inter Miami II: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chicago Fire II scores 1.96 and concedes 1.61 goals per match. Inter Miami II scores 0.91 and concedes 2.41. League average: 3.28 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chicago Fire II 70%, Inter Miami II 55%. Over 2.5: Chicago Fire II 83%, Inter Miami II 59%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.
xG, shots and style
Chicago Fire II has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.40. Chicago Fire II: 13.2 shots per match, Inter Miami II: 11.8.
Match halves
Chicago Fire II: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.87. Inter Miami II: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.41.
Goals by minute
Chicago Fire II: 31-45+ (13 goals). Inter Miami II: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.28 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chicago Fire II win 64% of their home matches, scoring an average of 2.45 goals per game, while Inter Miami II are yet to win away from home and lose as many as 83% of such matches. The hosts are in strong attacking form, having scored 17 goals in their last five games, whereas the visitors have managed just 2 goals over the same period and suffered 4 defeats. Miami II’s away defence concedes an average of 2.75 goals, has kept no clean sheets, and allows an average xG against of 1.93. At home, Chicago create chances worth an average of 1.79 xG and register 5 shots on target per match, giving them a clear advantage against such a vulnerable defence. The draw risk is also reduced by the fact that Inter Miami II fail to score in 50% of their away matches, compared with just 18% for Chicago Fire II.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - No scenario is slightly more likely, primarily due to Inter Miami II’s poor current scoring form: the team has scored just 2 goals in its last 5 matches, averaging 0.4 per game, while BTTS occurred in only 20% of those fixtures. The visitors have failed to score in 50% of their season matches, whereas Chicago Fire II have kept a clean sheet in just 11%, which still leaves room for an away goal. Chicago are, however, in excellent attacking form, scoring 17 goals in their last five appearances at an average of 3.4 per game, so the most realistic No Goal outcome is a home win to nil. Inter’s latest xG is 1.64, while Chicago have conceded an average of 1.8 goals in their last five matches, but the visitors’ actual goal output clearly does not confirm this potential. The teams’ season BTTS rates—56% for Chicago and 50% for Miami—are below the league average of 61%, and the visitors’ very poor scoring run shifts the prediction towards BTTS - No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as at least 2 goals were scored in 78% of Chicago Fire II matches and 83% of Inter Miami II fixtures. Inter Miami II have kept no clean sheets, concede an average of 2.75 goals per match, and have a high average xG against of 1.93. Chicago averaged 3.4 goals scored across their last five appearances and created an average of 2.08 xG, which clearly strengthens the case for at least two goals. The visitors have been offensively weak, averaging 0.4 goals in their last five matches, but Chicago have conceded an average of 1.8 goals during this period, so Inter’s contribution to the scoreline remains realistic. The 2.5 line offers a moderate edge towards the Over, while Over 1.5 is clearly the safer option with a projected 2.90 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Chicago Fire II have clearly improved their form, winning 3 of their last 5 matches and averaging 3.4 goals, while Inter Miami II have lost 4 of their last 5 and scored just 0.4 goals per match. The hosts held a lead at the break in 60% of their last five matches, averaging 1.8 goals before half-time, whereas the visitors failed to lead at the break on every occasion and scored only 0.2 goals in the first half. Chicago’s advantage should increase after the interval, as they have averaged 1.6 second-half goals in their last five matches, compared with Inter’s 0.2. The visitors’ season-long defensive record also provides a strong argument in favour of the hosts, with Inter conceding an average of 2.75 goals per match and keeping no clean sheets. The most likely scenario is therefore Chicago Fire II leading at half-time and maintaining their victory through to the end of the match, corresponding to the HT/FT outcome 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chicago Fire II | Inter Miami II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.20 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chicago Fire II is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Chicago Fire II · 1.2 pts / match - Inter Miami II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chicago Fire II is 115% better for: goals scored per match.
1.96 goals / match - Chicago Fire II · 0.91 goals / match - Inter Miami II
Chicago Fire II is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.61 goals / match - Chicago Fire II · 2.41 goals / match - Inter Miami II
Chicago Fire II scores in 83% of matches (19 of 23 matches), while Inter Miami II keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 22 matches).
Inter Miami II scores in 55% of matches (12 of 22 matches), while Chicago Fire II keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chicago Fire II
Over / Under - Inter Miami II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chicago Fire II is 87% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.61 pts / match - Chicago Fire II · 0.86 pts / match - Inter Miami II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chicago Fire II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 39%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Inter Miami II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 9%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 3.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chicago Fire II
Inter Miami II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Chicago Fire II | Liga | Inter Miami II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.57 | 3.28 | • 3.32 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 70% | 61% | ▼ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 83% | 66% | ▼ 59% |
| Clean sheets | • 22% | 21% | ▼ 5% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 76% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 91% | 84% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Chicago Fire IIGoalBrody Williams
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Chicago Fire II 2 - 1 - 0 Inter Miami II. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Chicago Fire II 3:1 Inter Miami II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Chicago Fire II and Inter Miami II?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Chicago Fire II won 2, Inter Miami II won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II?
Chicago Fire II score 1.96 goals per game on average and Inter Miami II 0.91. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Chicago Fire II's matches and 55% of Inter Miami II's.
What form are Chicago Fire II and Inter Miami II in?
Over the last 5 games Chicago Fire II have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Inter Miami II 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II?
The statistical background for Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.