Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Qingdao Jonoon: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Qingdao Jonoon: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chongqing Tongliang Long play Qingdao Jonoon in Chinese Super League (China). The match date is 24 October 2026.
Current form
Chongqing Tongliang Long: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Qingdao Jonoon: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chongqing Tongliang Long scores 1.04 and concedes 1.21 goals per match. Qingdao Jonoon scores 1.21 and concedes 2.14. League average: 3.11 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chongqing Tongliang Long 57%, Qingdao Jonoon 64%. Over 2.5: Chongqing Tongliang Long 32%, Qingdao Jonoon 64%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 58%.
xG, shots and style
Qingdao Jonoon has higher xG: 1.36 vs 1.04. Chongqing Tongliang Long: 9.1 shots per match, Qingdao Jonoon: 12.8.
Match halves
Chongqing Tongliang Long: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.64. Qingdao Jonoon: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.71.
Goals by minute
Chongqing Tongliang Long: 46-60 (7 goals). Qingdao Jonoon: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Chinese Super League: 3.11 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 58%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chongqing Tongliang Long | Qingdao Jonoon | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Qingdao Jonoon is 16% better for: goals scored per match.
1.04 goals / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 1.21 goals / match - Qingdao Jonoon
Chongqing Tongliang Long is 77% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.21 goals / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 2.14 goals / match - Qingdao Jonoon
Chongqing Tongliang Long scores in 75% of matches (21 of 28 matches), while Qingdao Jonoon keeps a clean sheet in 7% (2 of 28 matches).
Qingdao Jonoon scores in 68% of matches (19 of 28 matches), while Chongqing Tongliang Long keeps a clean sheet in 29% (8 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chongqing Tongliang Long
Over / Under - Qingdao Jonoon
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chongqing Tongliang Long is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.04 pts / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 0.96 pts / match - Qingdao Jonoon
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chongqing Tongliang Long - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Qingdao Jonoon - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -6 | -7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chongqing Tongliang Long
Qingdao Jonoon
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Chongqing Tongliang Long | Liga | Qingdao Jonoon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.25 | 3.11 | ▲ 3.36 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 57% | 63% | • 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 32% | 58% | ▲ 64% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 21% | ▼ 7% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 71% | • 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 82% | 87% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Chongqing Tongliang Long 1 - 0 - 0 Qingdao Jonoon. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
When do Chongqing Tongliang Long and Qingdao Jonoon play?
Chongqing Tongliang Long face Qingdao Jonoon on 24 October 2026 in Chinese Super League. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What do the goal statistics show before Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Qingdao Jonoon?
Chongqing Tongliang Long score 1.04 goals per game on average and Qingdao Jonoon 1.21. The Chinese Super League average is 3.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Chongqing Tongliang Long's matches and 64% of Qingdao Jonoon's.
What form are Chongqing Tongliang Long and Qingdao Jonoon in?
Over the last 5 games Chongqing Tongliang Long have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Qingdao Jonoon 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Qingdao Jonoon?
The statistical background for Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Qingdao Jonoon — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.