China - Chinese Super LeagueData current as of 25 September 2026

Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Shanghai SIPG: match statistics

Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Shanghai SIPG: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chongqing Tongliang Long played Shanghai SIPG in Chinese Super League (China). The match was played on 9 August 2026. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

Chongqing Tongliang Long: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Shanghai SIPG: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chongqing Tongliang Long scores 1.10 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. Shanghai SIPG scores 1.50 and concedes 1.35. League average: 3.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chongqing Tongliang Long 52%, Shanghai SIPG 70%. Over 2.5: Chongqing Tongliang Long 33%, Shanghai SIPG 60%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

Shanghai SIPG has higher xG: 1.40 vs 0.99. Chongqing Tongliang Long: 8.8 shots per match, Shanghai SIPG: 11.4.

Match halves

Chongqing Tongliang Long: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.71. Shanghai SIPG: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.90.

Goals by minute

Chongqing Tongliang Long: 46-60 (6 goals). Shanghai SIPG: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Chinese Super League: 3.02 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chongqing Tongliang Long have a clearly stronger home profile: they average 1.4 goals scored and concede only 1.0, while Shanghai SIPG score 1.2 goals away from home and allow opponents 1.6. The hosts also create higher-quality chances, recording an average xG of 1.17 while conceding just 0.96 xG, compared with 1.06 and 1.45 respectively in the visitors’ away matches. Chongqing’s advantage is further supported by their home results: a 40% win rate, only 10% defeats and 40% clean sheets, whereas Shanghai lose 50% of their away games and keep a clean sheet in just 10%. Both teams have identical records over their last five matches, with 1 win, 2 draws and 2 defeats each, but the hosts have conceded 5 goals during this period compared with 6 for the visitors. A draw remains a realistic outcome, as Chongqing shared the points in 50% of their home matches; however, the more stable defence and superior chance quality point towards a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have recorded the same high rate of matches with goals scored by both sides this season: 70%, compared with the league average of 64%. Chongqing score an average of 1.8 goals and generate 1.74 xG per match, while Shanghai concede an average of 1.6 goals and allow 1.45 xG at their own end. The visitors are less consistent in attack, averaging 1.2 goals and 1.06 xG, but the hosts have kept a clean sheet in only 20% of their matches, giving Shanghai a realistic route to scoring. Chongqing’s last five matches weaken the signal, as the team scored only 4 goals during that run and BTTS landed in 40% of games; however, Shanghai have recorded 1.59 xG and BTTS in 60% of matches over the same period. The advantage in seasonal attacking metrics, combined with both defences’ poor clean-sheet records, points slightly towards BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The season profile points to solid scoring potential: the home team averages 1.8 goals scored, while the visitors concede 1.6, with 90% of the home team’s matches and 70% of the visitors’ games going Over 1.5 goals. The hosts create an average of 1.74 xG from 14.8 shots per match, clearly above the visitors’ 1.06 xG and 8.1 shots, supporting the prediction of at least two goals. Both teams regularly allow opponents to score, with the hosts conceding in 80% of their matches and the visitors in 90%, while 70% of games involving either team have seen both teams score. Caution at higher lines is warranted based on the hosts’ last five appearances, which produced only 0.8 goals scored per match and never went Over 2.5 goals. Therefore, the strongest signal is Over 1.5: the projected 2.55 goals give this selection a clearer edge than an Over 2.5 bet.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Shanghai SIPG have had a clearly stronger start to matches recently: they were leading at the break in 3 of their last 5 games, while Chongqing Tongliang Long were trailing at half-time in 3 of their last 5. The visitors have recently averaged 1.0 goals scored before the break and conceded just 0.2, whereas the hosts have managed only 0.2 goals in this period while conceding 0.6. After the interval, however, the advantage should shift towards Chongqing, who average 1.2 goals scored in the second half over the season and concede 0.5, while Shanghai concede as many as 1.3 goals after half-time despite scoring just 0.6. In addition, the hosts have a higher season xG, 1.74 compared with 1.06, and average 14.8 shots per match versus their opponents’ 8.1, supporting the scenario of a turnaround and a win by the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 2
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
13Shots8
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
4Shots on target5
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
1.66xG1.18
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
7Corners4
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
77Dangerous attacks44
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
10Fouls16
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
3Cards0
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
1.1Goals scored / match1.5
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
1.14Goals conceded / match1.35
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
49%Average possession58%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
3.19Shots on target / match3.85
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.76Shots per match11.45
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
3.19Shots on target3.85
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
12.5%Shot conversion13.1%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
49%Possession58%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
0.99xG for1.4
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
1.3xG against1.3
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG

Shooting quality

Chongqing Tongliang Long: BalancedShanghai SIPG: Efficient finishing
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
Accuracy (shots on target)36%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shanghai SIPG is 250% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 1.4 pts / match - Shanghai SIPG

Chongqing Tongliang Long
LDDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W38% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-8-6
1.38 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-1
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DDLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.11Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
Shanghai SIPG
WLDWL
Season result split
30% W30% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-8
1.20 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shanghai SIPG is 36% better for: goals scored per match.

1.1 goals / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 1.5 goals / match - Shanghai SIPG

Chongqing Tongliang Long is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.14 goals / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 1.35 goals / match - Shanghai SIPG

Chongqing Tongliang Long scoring profile: very strong

Chongqing Tongliang Long scores in 76% of matches (16 of 21 matches), while Shanghai SIPG keeps a clean sheet in 15% (3 of 20 matches).

Shanghai SIPG scoring profile: very strong

Shanghai SIPG scores in 85% of matches (17 of 20 matches), while Chongqing Tongliang Long keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 matches).

23Goals scored (season)30
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
24Goals conceded (season)27
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
2.24Average goals in match2.85
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
3Goals scored (last 5)7
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal85%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
29%2 goals45%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
5%3 goals10%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
0%4 goals10%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal85%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
29%2 goals40%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
19%3 goals10%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
0%4 goals0%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
Chongqing Tongliang Long - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 21 matches
62%
League average

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time20%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
0%BTTS in both halves10%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
0%Scored in both halves30%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS55%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
60%BTTS - last 560%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG

1st half

52%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time30%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shanghai SIPG is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.1 pts / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 1.4 pts / match - Shanghai SIPG

Chongqing Tongliang Long - half-time state
19% leading52% draw29% trailing
Shanghai SIPG - half-time state
30% leading50% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.1Points per match (1st half)1.4
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.6
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
0.81Average goals (1st half)1.05
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
67%Clean sheet before half-time65%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
76%No goal before half-time50%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG

After half-time (2nd half)

1.48Points per match (2nd half)1.1
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.9
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)0.9
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
1.43Average goals (2nd half)1.8
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
52%Clean sheet after half-time35%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG
48%No goal after half-time35%
Chongqing Tongliang LongShanghai SIPG

Chongqing Tongliang Long - second-half results

38% W33% D29% L
23
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shanghai SIPG - second-half results

25% W35% D40% L
28
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chongqing Tongliang Long - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Shanghai SIPG - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chongqing Tongliang Long
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
3
3
16-30
2
6
31-45
6
4
46-60
5
5
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Shanghai SIPG
ScoredConceded
1
6
0-15
4
2
16-30
7
1
31-45
7
6
46-60
4
6
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.54
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
84%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chongqing Tongliang Long

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.98
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Shanghai SIPG

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).

Teams vs league

Chongqing Tongliang LongLigaShanghai SIPG
Average goals in match▼ 2.243.02▼ 2.85
Both teams scored▼ 52%62%▲ 70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 33%57%▲ 60%
Clean sheets▲ 33%21%▼ 15%
Goal before half-time▼ 52%70%▼ 65%
Goal after half-time▼ 81%87%▼ 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.02
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.77
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+42%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Chongqing Tongliang LongGoalYuwang Xiang
  2. Chongqing Tongliang LongYellow cardZhenquan Li
  3. Chongqing Tongliang LongYellow cardYuwang Xiang
  4. Shanghai SIPGGoalZhen Wei
  5. Chongqing Tongliang LongGoalMichael Ngadeu-NgadjuiAssist: Zhixiong Zhang
  6. Shanghai SIPGSubstitutionOn: Tyias BrowningOff: Xinxiang Li
  7. Chongqing Tongliang LongSubstitutionOn: Yu Hei NgOff: George Alexandru Cimpanu
  8. Chongqing Tongliang LongSubstitutionOn: Yongqiang WuOff: Zhixiong Zhang
  9. Chongqing Tongliang LongYellow cardYongqiang Wu

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Chongqing Tongliang Long 1 - 0 - 0 Shanghai SIPG. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Shanghai SIPG?

The Chinese Super League match finished Chongqing Tongliang Long 2:3 Shanghai SIPG. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Shanghai SIPG?

Chongqing Tongliang Long score 1.10 goals per game on average and Shanghai SIPG 1.50. The Chinese Super League average is 3.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Chongqing Tongliang Long's matches and 70% of Shanghai SIPG's.

What form are Chongqing Tongliang Long and Shanghai SIPG in?

Over the last 5 games Chongqing Tongliang Long have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Shanghai SIPG 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Shanghai SIPG?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Shanghai SIPG: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.