Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Shanghai SIPG: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Shanghai SIPG: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chongqing Tongliang Long play Shanghai SIPG in Chinese Super League (China). The match date is 9 August 2026.
Current form
Chongqing Tongliang Long: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Shanghai SIPG: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chongqing Tongliang Long scores 1.10 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. Shanghai SIPG scores 1.50 and concedes 1.35. League average: 3.08 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chongqing Tongliang Long 52%, Shanghai SIPG 70%. Over 2.5: Chongqing Tongliang Long 33%, Shanghai SIPG 60%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 58%.
xG, shots and style
Shanghai SIPG has higher xG: 1.40 vs 0.99. Chongqing Tongliang Long: 8.8 shots per match, Shanghai SIPG: 11.4.
Match halves
Chongqing Tongliang Long: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.71. Shanghai SIPG: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.90.
Goals by minute
Chongqing Tongliang Long: 46-60 (6 goals). Shanghai SIPG: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Chinese Super League: 3.08 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 58%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chongqing Tongliang Long | Shanghai SIPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Shanghai SIPG is 250% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 1.4 pts / match - Shanghai SIPG
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Shanghai SIPG is 36% better for: goals scored per match.
1.1 goals / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 1.5 goals / match - Shanghai SIPG
Chongqing Tongliang Long is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.14 goals / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 1.35 goals / match - Shanghai SIPG
Chongqing Tongliang Long scores in 76% of matches (16 of 21 matches), while Shanghai SIPG keeps a clean sheet in 15% (3 of 20 matches).
Shanghai SIPG scores in 85% of matches (17 of 20 matches), while Chongqing Tongliang Long keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chongqing Tongliang Long
Over / Under - Shanghai SIPG
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Shanghai SIPG is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.1 pts / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 1.4 pts / match - Shanghai SIPG
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chongqing Tongliang Long - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Shanghai SIPG - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chongqing Tongliang Long
Shanghai SIPG
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Chongqing Tongliang Long | Liga | Shanghai SIPG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.24 | 3.08 | ▼ 2.85 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 52% | 64% | ▲ 70% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 58% | ▲ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 20% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 52% | 71% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 81% | 88% | ▼ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Chongqing Tongliang Long 1 - 0 - 0 Shanghai SIPG. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
When do Chongqing Tongliang Long and Shanghai SIPG play?
Chongqing Tongliang Long face Shanghai SIPG on 9 August 2026 in Chinese Super League. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What do the goal statistics show before Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Shanghai SIPG?
Chongqing Tongliang Long score 1.10 goals per game on average and Shanghai SIPG 1.50. The Chinese Super League average is 3.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Chongqing Tongliang Long's matches and 70% of Shanghai SIPG's.
What form are Chongqing Tongliang Long and Shanghai SIPG in?
Over the last 5 games Chongqing Tongliang Long have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Shanghai SIPG 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Shanghai SIPG?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Shanghai SIPG: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.