Northern Ireland - NIFL PremiershipData current as of 23 July 2026

Cliftonville vs Bangor: match statistics

Cliftonville crest
Cliftonville
3 : 1half-time 1:0
Bangor crest
Bangor
165%(1.53)
X20%(3.80)
215%(5.50)

Cliftonville presents decidedly better home form with a 42% win rate and a positive goal difference (+2) at their own stadium. The hosts hold the advantage in possession (54% vs 41%) and scoring efficiency in home matches (1.5 goals on average). Bangor shows poor away disposition with 58% losses and a negative goal difference (-8), conceding an average of 1.92 goals per match. The form of both teams in the last five matches also favors the hosts (1.4 PPG vs 0.6 PPG). xG statistics confirm Cliftonville's advantage (1.51 vs 1.06), suggesting higher quality in chance creation. Considering all these factors, a home victory appears to be the most likely scenario.

Cliftonville vs Bangor: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cliftonville play Bangor in NIFL Premiership (Northern Ireland). The match date is 10 February 2026 at 20:45. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Cliftonville: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Bangor: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cliftonville scores 1.44 and concedes 1.56 goals per match. Bangor scores 1.08 and concedes 1.71. League average: 2.94 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cliftonville 59%, Bangor 55%. Over 2.5: Cliftonville 59%, Bangor 53%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Cliftonville has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.12. Cliftonville: 11.8 shots per match, Bangor: 8.3.

Match halves

Cliftonville: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.79. Bangor: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.55.

Goals by minute

Cliftonville: 76-90+ (14 goals). Bangor: 31-45+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NIFL Premiership: 2.94 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-1-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Cliftonville presents decidedly better home form with a 42% win rate and a positive goal difference (+2) at their own stadium. The hosts hold the advantage in possession (54% vs 41%) and scoring efficiency in home matches (1.5 goals on average). Bangor shows poor away disposition with 58% losses and a negative goal difference (-8), conceding an average of 1.92 goals per match. The form of both teams in the last five matches also favors the hosts (1.4 PPG vs 0.6 PPG). xG statistics confirm Cliftonville's advantage (1.51 vs 1.06), suggesting higher quality in chance creation. Considering all these factors, a home victory appears to be the most likely scenario.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
CliftonvilleBangor
21Shots10
CliftonvilleBangor
9Shots on target4
CliftonvilleBangor
2.35xG1.29
CliftonvilleBangor
2Corners5
CliftonvilleBangor
55Dangerous attacks52
CliftonvilleBangor
6Fouls5
CliftonvilleBangor
0Cards1
CliftonvilleBangor

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CliftonvilleBangor
1.44Goals scored / match1.08
CliftonvilleBangor
1.56Goals conceded / match1.71
CliftonvilleBangor
52%Average possession41%
CliftonvilleBangor
4.28Shots on target / match3.24
CliftonvilleBangor

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.77Shots per match8.26
CliftonvilleBangor
4.28Shots on target3.24
CliftonvilleBangor
12.2%Shot conversion13.1%
CliftonvilleBangor
52%Possession41%
CliftonvilleBangor
1.41xG for1.12
CliftonvilleBangor
1.46xG against1.6
CliftonvilleBangor

Shooting quality

Cliftonville: BalancedBangor: Counter-attacking
CliftonvilleBangor
Accuracy (shots on target)36%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cliftonville is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Cliftonville · 0.6 pts / match - Bangor

Cliftonville
LLWWL
Season result split
38% W21% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-8-16
1.36 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-4-7
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Bangor
DDDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
26% W24% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-9-19
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-6-8
Last 5 away
1-4-0
DDWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.80Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cliftonville is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.44 goals / match - Cliftonville · 1.08 goals / match - Bangor

Cliftonville is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.56 goals / match - Cliftonville · 1.71 goals / match - Bangor

Cliftonville scoring profile: very strong

Cliftonville scores in 77% of matches (30 of 39 matches), while Bangor keeps a clean sheet in 16% (6 of 38 matches).

Bangor scoring profile: strong

Bangor scores in 66% of matches (25 of 38 matches), while Cliftonville keeps a clean sheet in 26% (10 of 39 matches).

56Goals scored (season)41
CliftonvilleBangor
61Goals conceded (season)65
CliftonvilleBangor
3Average goals in match2.79
CliftonvilleBangor
7Goals scored (last 5)3
CliftonvilleBangor
11Goals conceded (last 5)8
CliftonvilleBangor

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal66%
CliftonvilleBangor
41%2 goals32%
CliftonvilleBangor
15%3 goals8%
CliftonvilleBangor
5%4 goals3%
CliftonvilleBangor

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal84%
CliftonvilleBangor
54%2 goals42%
CliftonvilleBangor
15%3 goals29%
CliftonvilleBangor
8%4 goals11%
CliftonvilleBangor

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time21%
CliftonvilleBangor
8%BTTS in both halves5%
CliftonvilleBangor
21%Scored in both halves24%
CliftonvilleBangor

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
CliftonvilleBangor
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
CliftonvilleBangor
80%BTTS - last 540%
CliftonvilleBangor

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
CliftonvilleBangor
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
CliftonvilleBangor
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
CliftonvilleBangor

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
CliftonvilleBangor
49%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
CliftonvilleBangor
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
CliftonvilleBangor

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cliftonville is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.23 pts / match - Cliftonville · 1.16 pts / match - Bangor

Cliftonville - half-time state
28% leading38% draw33% trailing
Bangor - half-time state
29% leading29% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.23Points per match (1st half)1.16
CliftonvilleBangor
0.64Goals scored (1st half)0.53
CliftonvilleBangor
0.77Goals conceded (1st half)0.84
CliftonvilleBangor
1.41Average goals (1st half)1.37
CliftonvilleBangor
46%Clean sheet before half-time45%
CliftonvilleBangor
54%No goal before half-time55%
CliftonvilleBangor

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)0.97
CliftonvilleBangor
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
CliftonvilleBangor
0.79Goals conceded (2nd half)0.87
CliftonvilleBangor
1.59Average goals (2nd half)1.42
CliftonvilleBangor
46%Clean sheet after half-time42%
CliftonvilleBangor
49%No goal after half-time55%
CliftonvilleBangor

Cliftonville - second-half results

36% W31% R33% P
48
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
54
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Bangor - second-half results

21% W34% R45% P
44
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding90%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 26%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Cliftonville - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match1.60.6
Average goals in match2.61.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5
Bangor - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cliftonville
ScoredConceded
9
3
0-15
7
11
16-30
9
16
31-45
10
8
46-60
7
13
61-75
14
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Bangor
ScoredConceded
4
9
0-15
4
10
16-30
12
13
31-45
9
9
46-60
5
10
61-75
7
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.90
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+4%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cliftonville

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Bangor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NIFL Premiership).

Teams vs league

CliftonvilleLigaBangor
Average goals in match 3.002.94 2.79
Both teams scored 59%52% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%56% 53%
Clean sheets 26%26% 16%
Goal before half-time 74%76% 79%
Goal after half-time 77%80% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.94
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.61
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Cliftonville 0 - 1 - 1 Bangor. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Bangor FC
1 : 1
Cliftonville FC
Bangor FC
3 : 1
Cliftonville FC

FAQ

What was the result of Cliftonville vs Bangor?

The NIFL Premiership match finished Cliftonville 3:1 Bangor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cliftonville and Bangor?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Cliftonville won 0, Bangor won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cliftonville vs Bangor?

Cliftonville score 1.44 goals per game on average and Bangor 1.08. The NIFL Premiership average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Cliftonville's matches and 55% of Bangor's.

What form are Cliftonville and Bangor in?

Over the last 5 games Cliftonville have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Bangor 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cliftonville vs Bangor?

The statistical background for Cliftonville vs Bangor — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.