Scotland - League TwoNew Douglas ParkData current as of 15 October 2026

Clyde vs Dumbarton: match statistics

Clyde crest
Clyde
2 : 1half-time 2:0
Dumbarton crest
Dumbarton

Clyde vs Dumbarton: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Clyde played Dumbarton in League Two (Scotland). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Venue: New Douglas Park. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Clyde: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Dumbarton: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Clyde scores 2.33 and concedes 1.78 goals per match. Dumbarton scores 1.11 and concedes 1.67. League average: 3.40 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Clyde 78%, Dumbarton 44%. Over 2.5: Clyde 78%, Dumbarton 67%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

Clyde has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.11. Clyde: 13.3 shots per match, Dumbarton: 8.0.

Match halves

Clyde: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 1.22. Dumbarton: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Clyde: 31-45+ (5 goals). Dumbarton: 61-75 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League Two: 3.40 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-2. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 40%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Clyde have won all 4 of their home matches so far, while Dumbarton have lost all 4 away games, clearly favouring the hosts. At home, Clyde average 3.25 goals scored and 1 conceded, whereas Dumbarton have managed just 0.5 goals per game away from home and conceded 2.5. The hosts’ advantage in chance creation is reflected in their average xG of 1.66 compared with the visitors’ 1.14, although the gap between Clyde’s goals scored and xG suggests they may not sustain such a high conversion rate. Dumbarton have won 4 of their last 5 matches overall, compared with Clyde’s 2, but the visitors’ away form remains considerably weaker. In addition, Clyde have conceded as many as 11 goals in their last 5 matches, so despite the hosts’ clear advantage, Dumbarton could still find the net.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

In their last 5 matches, both teams scored in 100% of Clyde’s games and 80% of Dumbarton’s, making this the strongest signal in favour of BTTS - Yes. Over this period, Clyde scored and conceded an average of 2.2 goals, while Dumbarton scored 2.4 and conceded 1.6 per match. The case for the home side to score is also supported by their average of 1.6 goals at home, compared with Dumbarton conceding 2.5 goals per away game. The main risk for this market is the visitors’ away scoring record: they average just 0.5 goals on the road and failed to score in 50% of their away matches, although their last 5 games point to a clear improvement in attack.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals: this line has been cleared in 80% of Clyde’s matches and 100% of Dumbarton’s matches in the provided data. Clyde score an average of 1.6 goals, while Dumbarton concede 2.5, giving the home side a clear chance of scoring at least twice. The last five matches for the two teams averaged 4.4 and 4.0 goals respectively, although these figures cover all their matches, not just this head-to-head pairing. I expect around 3.0 goals in total, but the visitors’ lower average of 0.5 goals scored makes Over 1.5 a safer pick than Over 2.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Clyde have won 80% of their home matches, while Dumbarton have lost 100% of their away fixtures, which clearly points to a home win. Clyde led at the break in 40% of their home matches, while Dumbarton were trailing at half-time in 50% of their away games, making a home lead at half-time the most likely single scenario. Clyde could extend their advantage after the break: the hosts average 1.2 goals in second halves, while the visitors concede 1.75 and have failed to score in any of their away second halves. In addition, Clyde average 1.6 goals per home match, while Dumbarton concede 2.5 per away match. However, caution is warranted, as Dumbarton have won four of their last five matches regardless of venue, so the HT/FT scenario of Clyde leading at the break and winning at full-time is not certain.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
ClydeDumbarton
8Shots5
ClydeDumbarton
5Shots on target2
ClydeDumbarton
1.4xG0.88
ClydeDumbarton
3Corners1
ClydeDumbarton
75Dangerous attacks58
ClydeDumbarton
13Fouls9
ClydeDumbarton
2Cards4
ClydeDumbarton

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.33Goals scored / match1.11
ClydeDumbarton
1.78Goals conceded / match1.67
ClydeDumbarton
56%Average possession47%
ClydeDumbarton
4.89Shots on target / match3.67
ClydeDumbarton

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.33Shots per match8
ClydeDumbarton
4.89Shots on target3.67
ClydeDumbarton
17.5%Shot conversion13.9%
ClydeDumbarton
56%Possession47%
ClydeDumbarton
1.59xG for1.11
ClydeDumbarton
1.18xG against1.54
ClydeDumbarton

Shooting quality

Clyde: Efficient finishingDumbarton: Counter-attacking
ClydeDumbarton
Accuracy (shots on target)37%46%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.480.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Dumbarton is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Clyde · 1.8 pts / match - Dumbarton

Clyde
DWWDL
Season result split
56% W22% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-2
1.89 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-0-0
Last 5 at home
4-0-0
WWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Dumbarton
LWLWW
Season result split
44% W0% D56% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-0-5
1.33 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-4
Last 5 away
0-0-4
LLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Clyde is 110% better for: goals scored per match.

2.33 goals / match - Clyde · 1.11 goals / match - Dumbarton

Dumbarton is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.78 goals / match - Clyde · 1.67 goals / match - Dumbarton

Clyde scoring profile: very strong

Clyde scores in 89% of matches (8 of 9 matches), while Dumbarton keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 matches).

Dumbarton scoring profile: very strong

Dumbarton scores in 67% of matches (6 of 9 matches), while Clyde keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 matches).

21Goals scored (season)10
ClydeDumbarton
16Goals conceded (season)15
ClydeDumbarton
4.11Average goals in match2.78
ClydeDumbarton
13Goals scored (last 5)8
ClydeDumbarton
13Goals conceded (last 5)7
ClydeDumbarton

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal67%
ClydeDumbarton
78%2 goals33%
ClydeDumbarton
56%3 goals11%
ClydeDumbarton
11%4 goals0%
ClydeDumbarton

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal78%
ClydeDumbarton
33%2 goals56%
ClydeDumbarton
22%3 goals33%
ClydeDumbarton
11%4 goals0%
ClydeDumbarton

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time11%
ClydeDumbarton
0%BTTS in both halves0%
ClydeDumbarton
56%Scored in both halves22%
ClydeDumbarton

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
ClydeDumbarton
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS22%
ClydeDumbarton
100%BTTS - last 560%
ClydeDumbarton

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

89%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
ClydeDumbarton
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
ClydeDumbarton
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
ClydeDumbarton

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
ClydeDumbarton
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
ClydeDumbarton
44%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
ClydeDumbarton

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Clyde is 64% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Clyde · 1.22 pts / match - Dumbarton

Clyde - half-time state
56% leading33% draw11% trailing
Dumbarton - half-time state
33% leading22% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1.22
ClydeDumbarton
1.11Goals scored (1st half)0.44
ClydeDumbarton
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
ClydeDumbarton
1.56Average goals (1st half)1.11
ClydeDumbarton
56%Clean sheet before half-time56%
ClydeDumbarton
22%No goal before half-time56%
ClydeDumbarton

After half-time (2nd half)

1.56Points per match (2nd half)1.11
ClydeDumbarton
1.22Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
ClydeDumbarton
1.33Goals conceded (2nd half)1
ClydeDumbarton
2.56Average goals (2nd half)1.67
ClydeDumbarton
44%Clean sheet after half-time33%
ClydeDumbarton
33%No goal after half-time56%
ClydeDumbarton

Clyde - second-half results

44% W22% D33% L
18
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.9

Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Dumbarton - second-half results

33% W11% D56% L
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Clyde - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.40
Goals scored / match0.81.8
Goals conceded / match0.42.2
Average goals in match1.24.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%80%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Dumbarton - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.40
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.82.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Clyde
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
4
2
16-30
5
2
31-45
4
4
46-60
2
1
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Dumbarton
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
3
16-30
2
1
31-45
2
4
46-60
3
3
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.45
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-42%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Clyde

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.74
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.60
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Dumbarton

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).

Teams vs league

ClydeLigaDumbarton
Average goals in match▲ 4.113.40▼ 2.78
Both teams scored▲ 78%53%▼ 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 78%62%▲ 67%
Clean sheets▼ 11%24%▼ 22%
Goal before half-time▲ 89%82%▼ 78%
Goal after half-time▼ 78%84%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.40
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
2.02
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+46%
Home attack advantage
+32%
Home defence advantage
+34%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
16%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ClydeSubstitutionOn: Marley RedfernOff: Nathan Cannon
  2. DumbartonYellow cardLeighton McIntosh
  3. ClydeYellow cardLogan Dunachie
  4. DumbartonYellow cardThomas Lang
  5. ClydeGoalJamie Bradley
  6. ClydeSubstitutionOn: Darren HynesOff: Barry Cuddihy
  7. ClydeYellow cardTimam Scott
  8. DumbartonGoalLeighton McIntoshAssist: Mason Munn
  9. DumbartonRed cardChristopher McKenna

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Clyde 2 - 1 - 2 Dumbarton. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 40% matches.

Dumbarton
1 : 0
Clyde
Clyde FC
2 : 0
Dumbarton FC
Dumbarton FC
0 : 0
Clyde FC
Clyde FC
3 : 1
Dumbarton FC
Dumbarton FC
2 : 1
Clyde FC

FAQ

What was the result of Clyde vs Dumbarton?

The League Two match finished Clyde 2:1 Dumbarton. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Clyde and Dumbarton?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Clyde won 2, Dumbarton won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Clyde vs Dumbarton?

Clyde score 2.33 goals per game on average and Dumbarton 1.11. The League Two average is 3.40 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 78% of Clyde's matches and 44% of Dumbarton's.

What form are Clyde and Dumbarton in?

Over the last 5 games Clyde have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Dumbarton 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Clyde vs Dumbarton?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.