United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 23 October 2026

Colorado Springs vs San Antonio: match statistics

Colorado Springs crest
Colorado Springs
2 : 1half-time 0:0
San Antonio crest
San Antonio

Colorado Springs vs San Antonio: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Colorado Springs played San Antonio in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Colorado Springs: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. San Antonio: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Colorado Springs scores 1.65 and concedes 1.57 goals per match. San Antonio scores 1.22 and concedes 1.13. League average: 2.71 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Colorado Springs 61%, San Antonio 48%. Over 2.5: Colorado Springs 57%, San Antonio 43%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Colorado Springs has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.42. Colorado Springs: 16.2 shots per match, San Antonio: 12.7.

Match halves

Colorado Springs: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 1.17. San Antonio: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.65.

Goals by minute

Colorado Springs: 76-90+ (14 goals). San Antonio: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-4. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Colorado Springs have a clear attacking edge at home: they average 1.91 goals, generate 2.11 xG and register 18.64 shots per match, while San Antonio average 1.27 goals, 1.20 xG and 10.91 shots away from home. The hosts win 55% of their home matches, whereas the visitors win 36% of their away fixtures and draw as many as 45% of them. Recent form also slightly favors Colorado Springs, who have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 10 goals during that run, compared with San Antonio’s 4 goals over the same period. Both teams concede an average of 1.27 goals in their respective home and away matches, but the hosts restrict opponents to just 0.92 xG, compared with 1.38 for the visitors. The superior quality of chances created and home advantage point to a Colorado Springs win, although San Antonio’s high draw rate limits confidence in the prediction.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Colorado Springs has recorded BTTS in only 42% of matches and has also kept a clean sheet in 42% of games, which strongly supports the possibility of a defensive struggle for one side. San Antonio has a higher seasonal BTTS rate of 55%, but averages just 1.27 goals per match and scored only 0.8 goals across its last 5 games. The hosts have recently been very attacking, averaging 2.0 goals and an xG of 2.13 per match over their last five appearances, but San Antonio conceded only 1.2 goals per game during that period, with an xG against of 1.16. The visitors failed to score in 36% of their matches this season, while the hosts did so in 42%, meaning the scenario in which at least one team fails to score is marginally more likely than both teams finding the net. Therefore, BTTS - No is the preferred selection over BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Colorado Springs generate an average of 1.62 xG per match and take 14.25 shots, while San Antonio allow an average of 1.38 xG, which supports the case for a home goal. However, the visitors produce only 1.20 xG and 3.18 shots on target per game, while the hosts keep a clean sheet in 42% of matches. In their last five appearances, Colorado Springs played games averaging 4.0 goals, but San Antonio scored just 0.8 goals per match during this period. The key signal in favor of the lower line comes from the full season: Over 3.5 goals did not land in 83% of the hosts’ matches and 82% of the visitors’ games. Therefore, the clearest edge lies with Under 3.5 goals, despite a realistic chance of a result featuring 2 or 3 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Colorado Springs win, as the hosts were level at the break in 6 of 12 matches, or 50% of the time, and in their last five games they went into half-time all square on five occasions. Colorado Springs have greater attacking potential, with an average xG of 1.62 compared with San Antonio’s 1.20, while the hosts average 14.25 shots and 4.67 shots on target, compared with their opponents’ 10.91 and 3.18, respectively. The hosts’ defence looks solid before the break, conceding only 0.33 goals per first half and keeping a clean sheet in 83% of such periods. After the interval, Colorado Springs have averaged 1.4 goals over their last five matches, while San Antonio have managed just 0.4, strengthening the case for a turnaround by the hosts. San Antonio frequently share the points, recording draws in 45% of their matches this season, but their average of 0.8 goals scored across their last five outings limits the likelihood of an away win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
9Shots7
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
4Shots on target1
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
1.3xG0.92
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
1Corners4
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
61Dangerous attacks56
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
12Fouls16
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
2Cards2
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
1.65Goals scored / match1.22
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
1.57Goals conceded / match1.13
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
54%Average possession54%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
4.48Shots on target / match3.96
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16.17Shots per match12.65
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
4.48Shots on target3.96
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
10.2%Shot conversion9.6%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
54%Possession54%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
1.78xG for1.42
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
1.17xG against1.32
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio

Shooting quality

Colorado Springs: AttackingSan Antonio: Balanced
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
Accuracy (shots on target)28%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Colorado Springs is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Colorado Springs · 1 pts / match - San Antonio

Colorado Springs
WLLWW
Season result split
43% W17% D39% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-4-9
1.48 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-3
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 2.14Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
San Antonio
DLLWD
Season result split
39% W39% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-5
1.57 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-5-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
LWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Colorado Springs is 35% better for: goals scored per match.

1.65 goals / match - Colorado Springs · 1.22 goals / match - San Antonio

San Antonio is 39% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.57 goals / match - Colorado Springs · 1.13 goals / match - San Antonio

Colorado Springs scoring profile: strong

Colorado Springs scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while San Antonio keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 matches).

San Antonio scoring profile: very strong

San Antonio scores in 61% of matches (14 of 23 matches), while Colorado Springs keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 23 matches).

38Goals scored (season)28
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
36Goals conceded (season)26
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
3.22Average goals in match2.35
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
10Goals scored (last 5)3
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
10Goals conceded (last 5)6
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal61%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
52%2 goals39%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
26%3 goals17%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
9%4 goals4%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal65%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
48%2 goals30%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
17%3 goals13%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
4%4 goals4%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
Colorado Springs - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 23 matches
55%
League average

Goal patterns

35%BTTS at half-time13%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
22%BTTS in both halves9%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
30%Scored in both halves30%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
60%BTTS - last 540%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio

2nd half

96%Min. 1 goal after half-time65%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
61%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

San Antonio is 55% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.04 pts / match - Colorado Springs · 1.61 pts / match - San Antonio

Colorado Springs - half-time state
9% leading78% draw13% trailing
San Antonio - half-time state
39% leading43% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.04Points per match (1st half)1.61
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
0.48Goals scored (1st half)0.57
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
0.48Goals conceded (1st half)0.52
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
0.96Average goals (1st half)1.09
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
52%Clean sheet before half-time70%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
57%No goal before half-time52%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio

After half-time (2nd half)

1.48Points per match (2nd half)1.3
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
1.17Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
1.09Goals conceded (2nd half)0.61
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
2.26Average goals (2nd half)1.26
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
26%Clean sheet after half-time52%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio
39%No goal after half-time57%
Colorado SpringsSan Antonio

Colorado Springs - second-half results

43% W17% D39% L
24
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding478%

Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

San Antonio - second-half results

26% W52% D22% L
37
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.61
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Colorado Springs - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.4
Average goals in match1.22.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3
San Antonio - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Colorado Springs
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
3
4
16-30
5
5
31-45
8
6
46-60
5
8
61-75
14
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

San Antonio
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
5
3
16-30
5
5
31-45
6
7
46-60
4
1
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.79
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Colorado Springs

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.61
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

San Antonio

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.57
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Colorado SpringsLigaSan Antonio
Average goals in match▲ 3.222.71▼ 2.35
Both teams scored▲ 61%55%▼ 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 57%49%▼ 43%
Clean sheets▼ 13%27%▲ 35%
Goal before half-time▼ 57%65%• 65%
Goal after half-time▲ 96%79%▼ 65%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.71
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.51
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. San AntonioYellow cardMichael Maldonado
  2. San AntonioSubstitutionOn: Cristian Agustín Parano RasguidoOff: Luke Haakenson
  3. Colorado SpringsYellow cardSteven Echevarria
  4. Colorado SpringsSubstitutionOn: Jonas FjeldbergOff: Bryce Jamison
  5. Colorado SpringsGoalJonas FjeldbergAssist: Jon-Talen Maples
  6. Colorado SpringsGoalKhori BennettAssist: Frank Daroma
  7. San AntonioSubstitutionOn: Emil CuelloOff: Nelson Blanco
  8. Colorado SpringsYellow cardChristian Herrera
  9. Colorado SpringsSubstitutionOn: Patrick Julien BurnerOff: Frank Daroma
  10. San AntonioSubstitutionOn: Santiago PatinoOff: Michael Maldonado
  11. San AntonioYellow cardJorge Hernandez
  12. San AntonioGoalEmil CuelloAssist: Daniel Barbir

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Colorado Springs 1 - 1 - 4 San Antonio. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Colorado Springs
1 : 2
San Antonio
San Antonio
3 : 3
Colorado Springs
Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC
1 : 0
San Antonio FC
San Antonio FC
3 : 2
Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC
Colorado Springs
1 : 2
San Antonio
San Antonio
2 : 0
Colorado Springs

FAQ

What was the result of Colorado Springs vs San Antonio?

The USL Championship match finished Colorado Springs 2:1 San Antonio. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Colorado Springs and San Antonio?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Colorado Springs won 1, San Antonio won 4 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Colorado Springs vs San Antonio?

Colorado Springs score 1.65 goals per game on average and San Antonio 1.22. The USL Championship average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Colorado Springs's matches and 48% of San Antonio's.

What form are Colorado Springs and San Antonio in?

Over the last 5 games Colorado Springs have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and San Antonio 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Colorado Springs vs San Antonio?

The statistical background for Colorado Springs vs San Antonio — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.