Colorado Springs vs San Antonio: match statistics
Colorado Springs vs San Antonio: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Colorado Springs played San Antonio in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Colorado Springs: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. San Antonio: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Colorado Springs scores 1.65 and concedes 1.57 goals per match. San Antonio scores 1.22 and concedes 1.13. League average: 2.71 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Colorado Springs 61%, San Antonio 48%. Over 2.5: Colorado Springs 57%, San Antonio 43%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Colorado Springs has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.42. Colorado Springs: 16.2 shots per match, San Antonio: 12.7.
Match halves
Colorado Springs: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 1.17. San Antonio: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.65.
Goals by minute
Colorado Springs: 76-90+ (14 goals). San Antonio: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-4. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Colorado Springs have a clear attacking edge at home: they average 1.91 goals, generate 2.11 xG and register 18.64 shots per match, while San Antonio average 1.27 goals, 1.20 xG and 10.91 shots away from home. The hosts win 55% of their home matches, whereas the visitors win 36% of their away fixtures and draw as many as 45% of them. Recent form also slightly favors Colorado Springs, who have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 10 goals during that run, compared with San Antonio’s 4 goals over the same period. Both teams concede an average of 1.27 goals in their respective home and away matches, but the hosts restrict opponents to just 0.92 xG, compared with 1.38 for the visitors. The superior quality of chances created and home advantage point to a Colorado Springs win, although San Antonio’s high draw rate limits confidence in the prediction.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Colorado Springs has recorded BTTS in only 42% of matches and has also kept a clean sheet in 42% of games, which strongly supports the possibility of a defensive struggle for one side. San Antonio has a higher seasonal BTTS rate of 55%, but averages just 1.27 goals per match and scored only 0.8 goals across its last 5 games. The hosts have recently been very attacking, averaging 2.0 goals and an xG of 2.13 per match over their last five appearances, but San Antonio conceded only 1.2 goals per game during that period, with an xG against of 1.16. The visitors failed to score in 36% of their matches this season, while the hosts did so in 42%, meaning the scenario in which at least one team fails to score is marginally more likely than both teams finding the net. Therefore, BTTS - No is the preferred selection over BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Colorado Springs generate an average of 1.62 xG per match and take 14.25 shots, while San Antonio allow an average of 1.38 xG, which supports the case for a home goal. However, the visitors produce only 1.20 xG and 3.18 shots on target per game, while the hosts keep a clean sheet in 42% of matches. In their last five appearances, Colorado Springs played games averaging 4.0 goals, but San Antonio scored just 0.8 goals per match during this period. The key signal in favor of the lower line comes from the full season: Over 3.5 goals did not land in 83% of the hosts’ matches and 82% of the visitors’ games. Therefore, the clearest edge lies with Under 3.5 goals, despite a realistic chance of a result featuring 2 or 3 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Colorado Springs win, as the hosts were level at the break in 6 of 12 matches, or 50% of the time, and in their last five games they went into half-time all square on five occasions. Colorado Springs have greater attacking potential, with an average xG of 1.62 compared with San Antonio’s 1.20, while the hosts average 14.25 shots and 4.67 shots on target, compared with their opponents’ 10.91 and 3.18, respectively. The hosts’ defence looks solid before the break, conceding only 0.33 goals per first half and keeping a clean sheet in 83% of such periods. After the interval, Colorado Springs have averaged 1.4 goals over their last five matches, while San Antonio have managed just 0.4, strengthening the case for a turnaround by the hosts. San Antonio frequently share the points, recording draws in 45% of their matches this season, but their average of 0.8 goals scored across their last five outings limits the likelihood of an away win.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Colorado Springs | San Antonio | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Colorado Springs is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Colorado Springs · 1 pts / match - San Antonio
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Colorado Springs is 35% better for: goals scored per match.
1.65 goals / match - Colorado Springs · 1.22 goals / match - San Antonio
San Antonio is 39% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.57 goals / match - Colorado Springs · 1.13 goals / match - San Antonio
Colorado Springs scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while San Antonio keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 matches).
San Antonio scores in 61% of matches (14 of 23 matches), while Colorado Springs keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Colorado Springs
Over / Under - San Antonio
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
San Antonio is 55% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.04 pts / match - Colorado Springs · 1.61 pts / match - San Antonio
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Colorado Springs - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
San Antonio - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Colorado Springs
San Antonio
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Colorado Springs | Liga | San Antonio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.22 | 2.71 | ▼ 2.35 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 61% | 55% | ▼ 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 49% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 27% | ▲ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 65% | • 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 96% | 79% | ▼ 65% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): Colorado Springs 1 - 1 - 4 San Antonio. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Colorado Springs vs San Antonio?
The USL Championship match finished Colorado Springs 2:1 San Antonio. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Colorado Springs and San Antonio?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Colorado Springs won 1, San Antonio won 4 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Colorado Springs vs San Antonio?
Colorado Springs score 1.65 goals per game on average and San Antonio 1.22. The USL Championship average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Colorado Springs's matches and 48% of San Antonio's.
What form are Colorado Springs and San Antonio in?
Over the last 5 games Colorado Springs have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and San Antonio 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Colorado Springs vs San Antonio?
The statistical background for Colorado Springs vs San Antonio — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


