Colorado Springs vs Tulsa Roughnecks: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Colorado Springs vs Tulsa Roughnecks: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Colorado Springs play Tulsa Roughnecks in USL Championship (United States). The match date is 25 October 2026.
Current form
Colorado Springs: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Tulsa Roughnecks: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Colorado Springs scores 1.45 and concedes 1.31 goals per match. Tulsa Roughnecks scores 1.17 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.71 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Colorado Springs 55%, Tulsa Roughnecks 45%. Over 2.5: Colorado Springs 48%, Tulsa Roughnecks 31%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Colorado Springs has higher xG: 1.73 vs 1.29. Colorado Springs: 15.6 shots per match, Tulsa Roughnecks: 10.7.
Match halves
Colorado Springs: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 1.03. Tulsa Roughnecks: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.59.
Goals by minute
Colorado Springs: 76-90+ (14 goals). Tulsa Roughnecks: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 7 previous H2H matches were available: 4-0-3. Average goals 2.29, BTTS 29%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Colorado Springs | Tulsa Roughnecks | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Colorado Springs is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Colorado Springs · 1.2 pts / match - Tulsa Roughnecks
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Colorado Springs is 24% better for: goals scored per match.
1.45 goals / match - Colorado Springs · 1.17 goals / match - Tulsa Roughnecks
Tulsa Roughnecks is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.31 goals / match - Colorado Springs · 1 goals / match - Tulsa Roughnecks
Colorado Springs scores in 69% of matches (20 of 29 matches), while Tulsa Roughnecks keeps a clean sheet in 41% (12 of 29 matches).
Tulsa Roughnecks scores in 69% of matches (20 of 29 matches), while Colorado Springs keeps a clean sheet in 24% (7 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Colorado Springs
Over / Under - Tulsa Roughnecks
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tulsa Roughnecks is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.1 pts / match - Colorado Springs · 1.62 pts / match - Tulsa Roughnecks
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Colorado Springs - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Tulsa Roughnecks - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Colorado Springs
Tulsa Roughnecks
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Colorado Springs | Liga | Tulsa Roughnecks | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.76 | 2.71 | ▼ 2.17 |
| Both teams scored | • 55% | 54% | ▼ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 48% | 49% | ▼ 31% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 28% | ▲ 41% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 48% | 66% | ▼ 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 77% | ▼ 66% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (7): Colorado Springs 4 - 0 - 3 Tulsa Roughnecks. Average goals 2.29, both teams scored in 29% matches.
FAQ
When do Colorado Springs and Tulsa Roughnecks play?
Colorado Springs face Tulsa Roughnecks on 25 October 2026 in USL Championship. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Colorado Springs and Tulsa Roughnecks?
In the last 7 head-to-head matches Colorado Springs won 4, Tulsa Roughnecks won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.29 goals, with both teams scoring in 29% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Colorado Springs vs Tulsa Roughnecks?
Colorado Springs score 1.45 goals per game on average and Tulsa Roughnecks 1.17. The USL Championship average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Colorado Springs's matches and 45% of Tulsa Roughnecks's.
What form are Colorado Springs and Tulsa Roughnecks in?
Over the last 5 games Colorado Springs have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Tulsa Roughnecks 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Colorado Springs vs Tulsa Roughnecks?
The statistical background for Colorado Springs vs Tulsa Roughnecks — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.