Italy - Serie AData current as of 11 September 2026

Como vs Lecce: match statistics

Como crest
Como
3 : 1half-time 3:1
Lecce crest
Lecce
165%(1.47)
X22%(4.60)
213%(8.35)

Como displays significantly better home form with a 46% win rate and an impressive +12 goal difference in home matches. The hosts maintain an average of 63% possession and score 1.62 goals per home fixture, conceding just 0.69. Lecce has very poor away statistics—only 25% wins on the road, a negative goal difference of -7, and failing to score in 50% of matches. Additionally, the visitors average only 0.67 goals per away match, which, combined with Como's 54% clean sheet rate at home, makes the hosts the clear favorite. The difference in xG (1.79 for Como vs 1.01 for Lecce) and table position (6th vs 18th) further confirm the hosts' advantage in this clash.

Como vs Lecce: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Como played Lecce in Serie A (Italy). The match was played on 28 February 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Como: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Lecce: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Como scores 1.58 and concedes 0.73 goals per match. Lecce scores 0.65 and concedes 1.27. League average: 2.41 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Como 38%, Lecce 31%. Over 2.5: Como 38%, Lecce 31%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Como has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.10. Como: 14.3 shots per match, Lecce: 10.0.

Match halves

Como: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.96. Lecce: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.31.

Goals by minute

Como: 61-75 (10 goals). Lecce: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie A: 2.41 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Como displays significantly better home form with a 46% win rate and an impressive +12 goal difference in home matches. The hosts maintain an average of 63% possession and score 1.62 goals per home fixture, conceding just 0.69. Lecce has very poor away statistics—only 25% wins on the road, a negative goal difference of -7, and failing to score in 50% of matches. Additionally, the visitors average only 0.67 goals per away match, which, combined with Como's 54% clean sheet rate at home, makes the hosts the clear favorite. The difference in xG (1.79 for Como vs 1.01 for Lecce) and table position (6th vs 18th) further confirm the hosts' advantage in this clash.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

3 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

69Possession (%)31
ComoLecce
12Shots5
ComoLecce
7Shots on target2
ComoLecce
1.6xG0.67
ComoLecce
5Corners1
ComoLecce
48Dangerous attacks28
ComoLecce
15Fouls12
ComoLecce
0Cards1
ComoLecce

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.58Goals scored / match0.65
ComoLecce
0.73Goals conceded / match1.27
ComoLecce
61%Average possession43%
ComoLecce
5.08Shots on target / match2.42
ComoLecce

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.31Shots per match10.04
ComoLecce
5.08Shots on target2.42
ComoLecce
11%Shot conversion6.5%
ComoLecce
61%Possession43%
ComoLecce
1.59xG for1.1
ComoLecce
1.1xG against1.48
ComoLecce

Shooting quality

Como: DominantLecce: Balanced
ComoLecce
Accuracy (shots on target)35%24%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Como is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Como · 1.4 pts / match - Lecce

Como
WDLDW
Season result split
46% W35% D19% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-9-5
1.73 pts / match · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-5-2
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.73Opponent xG: 0.91BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Lecce
DLWWL
Season result split
23% W23% D54% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-14
0.92 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-7
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Como is 143% better for: goals scored per match.

1.58 goals / match - Como · 0.65 goals / match - Lecce

Como is 74% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.73 goals / match - Como · 1.27 goals / match - Lecce

Como scoring profile: strong

Como scores in 73% of matches (19 of 26 matches), while Lecce keeps a clean sheet in 31% (8 of 26 matches).

Lecce scoring profile: more difficult

Lecce scores in 46% of matches (12 of 26 matches), while Como keeps a clean sheet in 50% (13 of 26 matches).

41Goals scored (season)17
ComoLecce
19Goals conceded (season)33
ComoLecce
2.31Average goals in match1.92
ComoLecce
10Goals scored (last 5)4
ComoLecce
3Goals conceded (last 5)4
ComoLecce

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal46%
ComoLecce
42%2 goals19%
ComoLecce
23%3 goals0%
ComoLecce
8%4 goals0%
ComoLecce

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal69%
ComoLecce
12%2 goals42%
ComoLecce
8%3 goals12%
ComoLecce
4%4 goals4%
ComoLecce

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time12%
ComoLecce
0%BTTS in both halves4%
ComoLecce
31%Scored in both halves8%
ComoLecce

BTTS and goal count

19%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
ComoLecce
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
ComoLecce
40%BTTS - last 520%
ComoLecce

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time54%
ComoLecce
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time19%
ComoLecce
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
ComoLecce

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
ComoLecce
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
ComoLecce
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
ComoLecce

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Como is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.65 pts / match - Como · 1.15 pts / match - Lecce

Como - half-time state
38% leading50% draw12% trailing
Lecce - half-time state
19% leading58% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.65Points per match (1st half)1.15
ComoLecce
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.35
ComoLecce
0.27Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
ComoLecce
0.88Average goals (1st half)0.73
ComoLecce
73%Clean sheet before half-time65%
ComoLecce
46%No goal before half-time69%
ComoLecce

After half-time (2nd half)

1.58Points per match (2nd half)0.77
ComoLecce
0.96Goals scored (2nd half)0.31
ComoLecce
0.46Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
ComoLecce
1.42Average goals (2nd half)1.19
ComoLecce
65%Clean sheet after half-time38%
ComoLecce
50%No goal after half-time77%
ComoLecce

Como - second-half results

42% W31% D27% L
43
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lecce - second-half results

15% W31% D54% L
30
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Como - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.60
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Lecce - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Como
ScoredConceded
8
3
0-15
5
2
16-30
3
2
31-45
5
6
46-60
10
2
61-75
10
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Lecce
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
3
5
16-30
2
4
31-45
1
4
46-60
2
12
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.12
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
35%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+42%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Como

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-19.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Lecce

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
57%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).

Teams vs league

ComoLigaLecce
Average goals in match 2.312.41 1.92
Both teams scored 38%46% 31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%46% 31%
Clean sheets 50%32% 31%
Goal before half-time 65%64% 54%
Goal after half-time 77%77% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.41
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+10%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LecceSubstitutionOn: Santiago PierottiOff: Corrie Ndaba
  2. LecceYellow cardLameck Banda
  3. LecceSubstitutionOn: Riccardo SottilOff: Lameck Banda
  4. LecceSubstitutionOn: Gaby JeanOff: Tiago Gabriel Coelho Oliveira

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Francesco FourneauMatches officiated: 11
4.09Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 255%Home wins18%Draws27%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Como 1 - 0 - 0 Lecce. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Como vs Lecce?

The Serie A match finished Como 3:1 Lecce. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Como vs Lecce?

Como score 1.58 goals per game on average and Lecce 0.65. The Serie A average is 2.41 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Como's matches and 31% of Lecce's.

What form are Como and Lecce in?

Over the last 5 games Como have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Lecce 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Como vs Lecce?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Como vs Lecce: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.