Italy - Serie AStadio Giuseppe SinigagliaData current as of 19 September 2026

Como vs Parma: match statistics

Como crest
Como
2 : 1half-time 1:0
Parma crest
Parma

Como vs Parma: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Como played Parma in Serie A (Italy). The match was played on 14 September 2026. Venue: Stadio Giuseppe Sinigaglia. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Como: 2-1-0, 2.33 points/match. Parma: 0-1-2, 0.33 points/match.

Goal statistics

Como scores 2.33 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Parma scores 0.33 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.92 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Como 100%, Parma 33%. Over 2.5: Como 67%, Parma 0%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

Como has higher xG: 2.16 vs 0.90. Como: 20.3 shots per match, Parma: 8.0.

Match halves

Como: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 0.67. Parma: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

Como: 16-30 (3 goals). Parma: 46-60 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie A: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 0.50, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Como remain unbeaten after three rounds, scoring 7 goals and conceding just 3, while Parma have 0 wins, 1 draw and 2 defeats with a 1:4 goal difference. The hosts have won 2 of their last 5 matches and averaged 1.6 points per game during that period, whereas Parma have suffered 3 defeats in five outings, collecting just 0.8 points per game. Parma’s away figures are particularly concerning: they have failed to score in 100% of their matches on the road, averaging 0 goals and allowing opponents an xG of 1.91. With Parma’s own xG standing at just 0.57 and an average of 2 goals conceded away from home, Como should create more chances and have strong grounds to win. A draw remains possible due to the limited sample size, but the advantage in form, attacking efficiency and defensive performance clearly favors the hosts.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Parma’s very poor away scoring record: the team averages 0.0 goals, has failed to score in 100% of such matches, and records just 0.57 xG. Como are not an exceptionally prolific home side either, averaging 0.5 goals and 1.06 xG, although Parma’s defense allows opponents 1.91 xG and concedes an average of 2.0 goals. In their last five matches, Como have improved offensively to 1.4 goals and 1.82 xG, making a home goal a realistic scenario, but Parma have scored only 0.6 goals per game over the same period. Parma’s BTTS rate stands at 0% in the season data and just 20% across their last five appearances, well below the league average of 53%, so it is more likely that at least one team—primarily the visitors—will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have finished all of their league matches to date with a maximum of 2 goals, which clearly supports the low 3.5 goal line. Parma have averaged 0.6 goals in their last 5 matches and have failed to score in any of their away appearances so far, despite recording an average xG of 1.12 over their last five games. Como are in better attacking form, scoring 1.4 goals per match across their last 5 outings and creating an average of 1.82 xG, but Parma have conceded just 1.2 goals per game during this period. The projected total of 2.20 goals suggests a home advantage but does not point to an open game with four goals. The strongest selection is therefore Under 3.5 goals, as even with an improvement in Como’s attack, Parma’s poor finishing limits the match’s scoring potential.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Como are showing clearly better current form: over their last five matches, they have averaged 1.4 goals and 1.6 points, compared with Parma’s 0.6 goals and 0.8 points. The hosts won 40% of those games and lost just 20%, while the visitors suffered defeat in 60% of their matches. Como’s advantage is also evident before the break, as they averaged 1.0 goal in first halves compared with Parma’s 0.4, and held a lead at the break in 40% of their matches, versus 20% for their opponents. Parma have yet to score in the available seasonal data, while their attacking xG stands at just 0.57, with an average xG conceded of 1.91, further supporting a scenario in which the hosts control the game. The most likely outcome is therefore Como taking the lead before half-time and maintaining it until the final whistle: 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
ComoParma
29Shots12
ComoParma
7Shots on target4
ComoParma
2.99xG1.29
ComoParma
11Corners4
ComoParma
95Dangerous attacks35
ComoParma
8Fouls4
ComoParma
1Cards0
ComoParma

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.33Goals scored / match0.33
ComoParma
1Goals conceded / match1.33
ComoParma
60%Average possession45%
ComoParma
7Shots on target / match2.67
ComoParma

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

20.33Shots per match8
ComoParma
7Shots on target2.67
ComoParma
11.5%Shot conversion4.2%
ComoParma
60%Possession45%
ComoParma
2.16xG for0.9
ComoParma
1.33xG against1.71
ComoParma

Shooting quality

Como: DominantParma: Balanced
ComoParma
Accuracy (shots on target)34%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.12

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Como is 606% better for: last-5 form.

2.33 pts / match - Como · 0.33 pts / match - Parma

Como
DWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
67% W33% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.3Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 2.16Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 67%
Parma
LLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W33% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.3Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 0.90Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Como is 606% better for: goals scored per match.

2.33 goals / match - Como · 0.33 goals / match - Parma

Como is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Como · 1.33 goals / match - Parma

Como scoring profile: very strong

Como scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Parma keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

Parma scoring profile: strong

Parma scores in 33% of matches (1 of 3 matches), while Como keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

7Goals scored (season)1
ComoParma
3Goals conceded (season)4
ComoParma
3.33Average goals in match1.67
ComoParma
7Goals scored (last 5)1
ComoParma
3Goals conceded (last 5)4
ComoParma

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal33%
ComoParma
67%2 goals0%
ComoParma
33%3 goals0%
ComoParma
33%4 goals0%
ComoParma

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
ComoParma
0%2 goals33%
ComoParma
0%3 goals0%
ComoParma
0%4 goals0%
ComoParma

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

67%BTTS at half-time0%
ComoParma
0%BTTS in both halves0%
ComoParma
33%Scored in both halves0%
ComoParma

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
ComoParma
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
ComoParma
100%BTTS - last 533%
ComoParma

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time33%
ComoParma
67%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
ComoParma
67%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
ComoParma

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
ComoParma
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
ComoParma
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
ComoParma

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Como is 199% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Como · 0.67 pts / match - Parma

Como - half-time state
67% leading0% draw33% trailing
Parma - half-time state
0% leading67% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)0.67
ComoParma
1.67Goals scored (1st half)0
ComoParma
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
ComoParma
2.67Average goals (1st half)0.33
ComoParma
0%Clean sheet before half-time67%
ComoParma
33%No goal before half-time100%
ComoParma

After half-time (2nd half)

2.33Points per match (2nd half)1
ComoParma
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
ComoParma
0Goals conceded (2nd half)1
ComoParma
0.67Average goals (2nd half)1.33
ComoParma
100%Clean sheet after half-time33%
ComoParma
33%No goal after half-time67%
ComoParma

Como - second-half results

67% W33% D0% L
6
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-1.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Parma - second-half results

33% W0% D67% L
2
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Como - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.33
Goals scored / match1.70.7
Goals conceded / match1.00.0
Average goals in match2.70.7
1 goal100%67%
2 goals67%0%
3 goals67%0%
Clean sheet0%100%
No goal33%33%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 67% leading - 0% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 67% won - 33% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 67% - Half-time goals total: 5
Parma - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.671.00
Goals scored / match0.00.3
Goals conceded / match0.31.0
Average goals in match0.31.3
1 goal33%100%
2 goals0%33%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet67%33%
No goal100%67%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 67% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 0% draw - 67% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Como
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
3
3
16-30
2
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Parma
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-80%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Como

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.83
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
165%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Parma

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.81
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.57
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
22%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).

Teams vs league

ComoLigaParma
Average goals in match 3.332.92 1.67
Both teams scored 100%59% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%57% 0%
Clean sheets 0%20% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%59% 33%
Goal after half-time 67%86% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.92
Average goals per match
59%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.41
Home goals / match
1.51
Away goals / match
+-7%
Home attack advantage
+-7%
Home defence advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
8%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
30%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ParmaSubstitutionOn: Matija FriganOff: El Bilal Touru00e9
  2. ComoSubstitutionOn: Anastasios DouvikasOff: Moise Bioty Kean
  3. ComoYellow cardMaxence Caqueret

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Como 1 - 1 - 0 Parma. Average goals 0.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Calcio Como
1 : 0
Parma Calcio 1913
Parma Calcio 1913
0 : 0
Calcio Como

FAQ

What was the result of Como vs Parma?

The Serie A match finished Como 2:1 Parma. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Como and Parma?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Como won 1, Parma won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Como vs Parma?

Como score 2.33 goals per game on average and Parma 0.33. The Serie A average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Como's matches and 33% of Parma's.

What form are Como and Parma in?

Over the last 5 games Como have a 2-1-0 record (2.33 points per game) and Parma 0-1-2 (0.33 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Como vs Parma?

The statistical background for Como vs Parma — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.