Italy - Serie AData current as of 11 September 2026

Como vs Pisa: match statistics

Como crest
Como
5 : 0half-time 2:0
Pisa crest
Pisa
170%(1.27)
X20%(5.70)
210%(10.54)

Como is clearly in better form, occupying 4th place in the standings with an impressive record of 15 wins and a +15 goal difference at home. The hosts are in excellent form, winning 4 of their last 5 matches and averaging 1.73 goals per home match while conceding just 0.73 goals. Pisa is in 19th place, has not won a single away match this season, and has a disastrous goal difference of -15 on the road. The visitors have lost 4 of their last 5 matches, conceding an average of 2.21 goals per away match. The xG statistics (1.81 vs 1.04) and possession (64% vs 38%) further confirm Como's superiority, making the hosts' victory the most likely scenario.

Como vs Pisa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Como played Pisa in Serie A (Italy). The match was played on 22 March 2026. Final score: 5:0.

Current form

Como: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Pisa: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Como scores 1.66 and concedes 0.76 goals per match. Pisa scores 0.79 and concedes 1.69. League average: 2.45 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Como 45%, Pisa 45%. Over 2.5: Como 45%, Pisa 45%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Como has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.11. Como: 14.3 shots per match, Pisa: 9.9.

Match halves

Como: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.97. Pisa: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.45.

Goals by minute

Como: 76-90+ (12 goals). Pisa: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie A: 2.45 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Como is clearly in better form, occupying 4th place in the standings with an impressive record of 15 wins and a +15 goal difference at home. The hosts are in excellent form, winning 4 of their last 5 matches and averaging 1.73 goals per home match while conceding just 0.73 goals. Pisa is in 19th place, has not won a single away match this season, and has a disastrous goal difference of -15 on the road. The visitors have lost 4 of their last 5 matches, conceding an average of 2.21 goals per away match. The xG statistics (1.81 vs 1.04) and possession (64% vs 38%) further confirm Como's superiority, making the hosts' victory the most likely scenario.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
3 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

73Possession (%)27
ComoPisa
14Shots7
ComoPisa
7Shots on target0
ComoPisa
1.71xG0.69
ComoPisa
7Corners1
ComoPisa
43Dangerous attacks35
ComoPisa
5Fouls6
ComoPisa
0Cards2
ComoPisa

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.66Goals scored / match0.79
ComoPisa
0.76Goals conceded / match1.69
ComoPisa
61%Average possession40%
ComoPisa
5.1Shots on target / match2.83
ComoPisa

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.28Shots per match9.93
ComoPisa
5.1Shots on target2.83
ComoPisa
11.6%Shot conversion8%
ComoPisa
61%Possession40%
ComoPisa
1.59xG for1.11
ComoPisa
1.05xG against1.66
ComoPisa

Shooting quality

Como: DominantPisa: Balanced
ComoPisa
Accuracy (shots on target)36%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Como is 333% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Como · 0.6 pts / match - Pisa

Como
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
52% W31% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-9-5
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-5-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 0.87BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Pisa
LLLLW
Season result split
7% W41% D52% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-12-15
0.62 pts / match · goal difference -26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-8-6
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 0.95Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Como is 110% better for: goals scored per match.

1.66 goals / match - Como · 0.79 goals / match - Pisa

Como is 122% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.76 goals / match - Como · 1.69 goals / match - Pisa

Como scoring profile: very strong

Como scores in 76% of matches (22 of 29 matches), while Pisa keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 29 matches).

Pisa scoring profile: mixed

Pisa scores in 48% of matches (14 of 29 matches), while Como keeps a clean sheet in 45% (13 of 29 matches).

48Goals scored (season)23
ComoPisa
22Goals conceded (season)49
ComoPisa
2.41Average goals in match2.48
ComoPisa
10Goals scored (last 5)4
ComoPisa
4Goals conceded (last 5)9
ComoPisa

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal48%
ComoPisa
48%2 goals28%
ComoPisa
24%3 goals3%
ComoPisa
7%4 goals0%
ComoPisa

How often they concede at least...

55%1 goal83%
ComoPisa
10%2 goals48%
ComoPisa
7%3 goals21%
ComoPisa
3%4 goals10%
ComoPisa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
ComoPisa
0%BTTS in both halves3%
ComoPisa
31%Scored in both halves14%
ComoPisa

BTTS and goal count

28%Min. 3 goals and BTTS34%
ComoPisa
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
ComoPisa
80%BTTS - last 540%
ComoPisa

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time55%
ComoPisa
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
ComoPisa
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
ComoPisa

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
ComoPisa
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
ComoPisa
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
ComoPisa

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Como is 97% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.69 pts / match - Como · 0.86 pts / match - Pisa

Como - half-time state
41% leading45% draw14% trailing
Pisa - half-time state
10% leading55% draw34% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.69Points per match (1st half)0.86
ComoPisa
0.69Goals scored (1st half)0.34
ComoPisa
0.31Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
ComoPisa
1Average goals (1st half)1.03
ComoPisa
69%Clean sheet before half-time55%
ComoPisa
45%No goal before half-time72%
ComoPisa

After half-time (2nd half)

1.59Points per match (2nd half)0.9
ComoPisa
0.97Goals scored (2nd half)0.45
ComoPisa
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)1
ComoPisa
1.41Average goals (2nd half)1.45
ComoPisa
66%Clean sheet after half-time38%
ComoPisa
48%No goal after half-time66%
ComoPisa

Como - second-half results

41% W34% D24% L
49
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pisa - second-half results

14% W48% D38% L
25
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding70%

Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 7%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Como - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.401.60
Goals scored / match1.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.61.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+4+2
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
Pisa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match0.62.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Como
ScoredConceded
9
5
0-15
6
2
16-30
5
2
31-45
6
7
46-60
10
2
61-75
12
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Pisa
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
3
3
16-30
2
12
31-45
5
6
46-60
3
9
61-75
5
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.45
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
36%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Como

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-17.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
129%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.74
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Pisa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).

Teams vs league

ComoLigaPisa
Average goals in match 2.412.45 2.48
Both teams scored 45%47% 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 45%47% 45%
Clean sheets 45%31% 17%
Goal before half-time 69%65% 55%
Goal after half-time 76%77% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.45
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.29
Home goals / match
1.16
Away goals / match
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PisaYellow cardSimone Canestrelli
  2. PisaYellow cardSamuele Angori
  3. PisaSubstitutionOn: Filip StojilkovicOff: Stefano Moreo

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Luca PairettoMatches officiated: 10
5.9Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 240%Home wins30%Draws30%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Como 1 - 0 - 0 Pisa. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Como vs Pisa?

The Serie A match finished Como 5:0 Pisa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Como vs Pisa?

Como score 1.66 goals per game on average and Pisa 0.79. The Serie A average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Como's matches and 45% of Pisa's.

What form are Como and Pisa in?

Over the last 5 games Como have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Pisa 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Como vs Pisa?

The statistical background for Como vs Pisa — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.