Italy - Serie AData current as of 11 September 2026

Como vs Roma: match statistics

Como crest
Como
2 : 1half-time 0:1
Roma crest
Roma
145%(2.07)
X30%(3.30)
225%(3.65)

Como presents an impressive home form with a 50% win rate and only a 14% defeat rate at their own stadium, averaging 1.71 goals per match with a very low average of conceded goals (0.71). The hosts are in excellent shape with a streak of three wins and two draws in their last five fixtures, earning an average of 2.2 points per match. Roma is struggling in away games, losing as much as 43% of their matches and scoring an average of only 1.14 goals, and their recent form (1 win, 3 draws, 1 loss) is noticeably weaker than Como's. Furthermore, Roma has negative xG stats on the road (1.37 xG For vs 1.27 xG Against), which suggests difficulties in creating chances. Como's high ball possession (64%) and home efficiency strongly advocate for a home win, although Roma's experience and their 50% away win rate mean an upset cannot be ruled out.

Como vs Roma: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Como played Roma in Serie A (Italy). The match was played on 15 March 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Como: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Roma: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Como scores 1.64 and concedes 0.75 goals per match. Roma scores 1.36 and concedes 0.75. League average: 2.44 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Como 43%, Roma 32%. Over 2.5: Como 43%, Roma 32%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Roma has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.57. Como: 14.0 shots per match, Roma: 13.5.

Match halves

Como: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.93. Roma: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.82.

Goals by minute

Como: 76-90+ (11 goals). Roma: 61-75 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie A: 2.44 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Como presents an impressive home form with a 50% win rate and only a 14% defeat rate at their own stadium, averaging 1.71 goals per match with a very low average of conceded goals (0.71). The hosts are in excellent shape with a streak of three wins and two draws in their last five fixtures, earning an average of 2.2 points per match. Roma is struggling in away games, losing as much as 43% of their matches and scoring an average of only 1.14 goals, and their recent form (1 win, 3 draws, 1 loss) is noticeably weaker than Como's. Furthermore, Roma has negative xG stats on the road (1.37 xG For vs 1.27 xG Against), which suggests difficulties in creating chances. Como's high ball possession (64%) and home efficiency strongly advocate for a home win, although Roma's experience and their 50% away win rate mean an upset cannot be ruled out.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

66Possession (%)34
ComoRoma
22Shots3
ComoRoma
7Shots on target1
ComoRoma
2.24xG0.39
ComoRoma
7Corners1
ComoRoma
50Dangerous attacks16
ComoRoma
16Fouls18
ComoRoma
2Cards3
ComoRoma

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.64Goals scored / match1.36
ComoRoma
0.75Goals conceded / match0.75
ComoRoma
61%Average possession57%
ComoRoma
5.04Shots on target / match4.64
ComoRoma

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14Shots per match13.54
ComoRoma
5.04Shots on target4.64
ComoRoma
11.7%Shot conversion10%
ComoRoma
61%Possession57%
ComoRoma
1.57xG for1.58
ComoRoma
1.08xG against1.12
ComoRoma

Shooting quality

Como: DominantRoma: Balanced
ComoRoma
Accuracy (shots on target)36%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Como is 25% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Como · 1.6 pts / match - Roma

Como
LDWWW
Season result split
50% W32% D18% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-9-5
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +25
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-5-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 0.95BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Roma
WDWDL
Season result split
57% W11% D32% L
Season (W-D-L)
16-3-9
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-1-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WWLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.03BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Como is 21% better for: goals scored per match.

1.64 goals / match - Como · 1.36 goals / match - Roma

Como scoring profile: strong

Como scores in 75% of matches (21 of 28 matches), while Roma keeps a clean sheet in 43% (12 of 28 matches).

Roma scoring profile: strong

Roma scores in 75% of matches (21 of 28 matches), while Como keeps a clean sheet in 46% (13 of 28 matches).

46Goals scored (season)38
ComoRoma
21Goals conceded (season)21
ComoRoma
2.39Average goals in match2.11
ComoRoma
9Goals scored (last 5)11
ComoRoma
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
ComoRoma

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal75%
ComoRoma
46%2 goals46%
ComoRoma
25%3 goals14%
ComoRoma
7%4 goals0%
ComoRoma

How often they concede at least...

54%1 goal57%
ComoRoma
11%2 goals14%
ComoRoma
7%3 goals4%
ComoRoma
4%4 goals0%
ComoRoma

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time7%
ComoRoma
0%BTTS in both halves4%
ComoRoma
32%Scored in both halves29%
ComoRoma

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
ComoRoma
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
ComoRoma
80%BTTS - last 560%
ComoRoma

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time61%
ComoRoma
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time11%
ComoRoma
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
ComoRoma

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
ComoRoma
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
ComoRoma
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
ComoRoma

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Como is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.75 pts / match - Como · 1.61 pts / match - Roma

Como - half-time state
43% leading46% draw11% trailing
Roma - half-time state
39% leading43% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.75Points per match (1st half)1.61
ComoRoma
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.54
ComoRoma
0.29Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
ComoRoma
1Average goals (1st half)0.79
ComoRoma
71%Clean sheet before half-time75%
ComoRoma
43%No goal before half-time57%
ComoRoma

After half-time (2nd half)

1.54Points per match (2nd half)1.64
ComoRoma
0.93Goals scored (2nd half)0.82
ComoRoma
0.46Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
ComoRoma
1.39Average goals (2nd half)1.32
ComoRoma
64%Clean sheet after half-time61%
ComoRoma
50%No goal after half-time39%
ComoRoma

Como - second-half results

39% W36% D25% L
49
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Roma - second-half results

43% W36% D21% L
45
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.61
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Como - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.401.20
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.61.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+40
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
Roma - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match0.61.6
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.82.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Como
ScoredConceded
9
4
0-15
6
2
16-30
5
2
31-45
5
7
46-60
10
2
61-75
11
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

Roma
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
7
0
16-30
4
4
31-45
6
4
46-60
11
2
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-56%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Como

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Roma

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
58%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).

Teams vs league

ComoLigaRoma
Average goals in match 2.392.44 2.11
Both teams scored 43%47% 32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%47% 32%
Clean sheets 46%31% 43%
Goal before half-time 68%65% 61%
Goal after half-time 75%77% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.44
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
1.14
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ComoYellow cardMaxence Caqueret
  2. ComoSubstitutionOn: Maximo PerroneOff: Maxence Caqueret
  3. RomaYellow cardDaniele Ghilardi
  4. ComoSubstitutionOn: Ignace Van Der BremptOff: Lucas Da Cunha

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Davide MassaMatches officiated: 17
5.29Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 218%Home wins24%Draws59%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Como 0 - 0 - 1 Roma. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Como vs Roma?

The Serie A match finished Como 2:1 Roma. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Como vs Roma?

Como score 1.64 goals per game on average and Roma 1.36. The Serie A average is 2.44 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Como's matches and 32% of Roma's.

What form are Como and Roma in?

Over the last 5 games Como have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Roma 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Como vs Roma?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.