United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 06 September 2026

Connecticut United vs Toronto II: match statistics

Connecticut United vs Toronto II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Connecticut United played Toronto II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 12 July 2026. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Connecticut United: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Toronto II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Connecticut United scores 1.75 and concedes 1.81 goals per match. Toronto II scores 1.47 and concedes 1.88. League average: 3.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Connecticut United 75%, Toronto II 53%. Over 2.5: Connecticut United 81%, Toronto II 71%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Connecticut United has higher xG: 1.75 vs 1.25. Connecticut United: 14.2 shots per match, Toronto II: 10.2.

Match halves

Connecticut United: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.81. Toronto II: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.82.

Goals by minute

Connecticut United: 31-45+ (7 goals). Toronto II: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.23 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates an advantage for Connecticut United: hosts score on average 1.43 goals per home match with average xG 1.67, while Toronto II scores 1.22 goals away with xG 1.21. In the last 5 matches Connecticut has scored 13 goals (2.6 per match) and averaged 1.8 points per match, whereas Toronto has only 5 goals in five games (1.0 per match) and 0.6 points per match. Defensively the visitors perform worse: Toronto concedes 1.89 goals on average away and have conceded 14 goals in the last 5 matches, while the hosts concede 1.71 at home and had 9 goals conceded in those five games. Connecticut also creates more chances — on average 13.71 shots and 6 shots on target per home match versus Toronto’s 9.89 shots and 4.33 on target — and the visitors fail to score in 56% of away matches compared to 29% for the hosts. Considering form (3 wins in the last 5 for the hosts), the xG advantage (1.67 vs 1.21) and a clearly superior chance-creation profile, I assess probabilities as: home 65%, draw 20%, away 15%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS market leans toward Yes because Connecticut United has a season BTTS rate of 88% and 80% in the last 5 matches, while Toronto II, despite a season rate of 22%, has reached 60% BTTS in their last 5 games. Connecticut averages 1.75 goals per game this season (2.6 in the last 5) and concedes 1.88 (1.8 in the last 5), whereas Toronto records 1.22 goals this season (1.0 in the last 5) and concedes 1.89 (2.8 in the last 5), indicating a high likelihood of goals at both ends. xG confirms the offensive profile: Connecticut has xG 1.31 versus Toronto 1.21 and xG against 1.65 versus 1.78, and the league average BTTS is 62%, which further favors Goal/Goal. Additionally, the home side has only 13% clean sheet expected matches this season, and Toronto concedes an average of 2.8 goals in their last 5, so I assess BTTS probability at 75% vs 25% and recommend a BTTS - Yes wager.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I forecast around 3.25 total goals: 1.80 for Connecticut United and 1.45 for Toronto II. Based on xG: home xG = 1.31 vs xG conceded to Toronto = 1.78 (avg ~1.55 for the home side), away xG = 1.21 vs xG conceded to Connecticut = 1.65 (avg ~1.43 for the away side), and the last 5 matches boost the home evaluation (last5 xG_for_home = 1.8 and last5 xG_against_away = 1.79). Match statistics confirm a high goal potential — seasonally Connecticut has 88% of matches Over 2.5, Toronto 56%, and in the last 5 games the Over 2.5 rates are 100% (home) and 80% (away); the combined average goals in those last 5 matches is ~4.1 goals (22 and 19 goals in five matches). A Poisson model with lambda=3.25 gives P(>1.5)≈83.5% and P(>2.5)≈63.0%, therefore I rate Over 1.5 at ~84% and Over 2.5 at ~63%. The strongest signal from the data is the Over on the 1.5 line (most likely), although the 2.5 line also has solid statistical support.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Connecticut United has a clear advantage at the break — they led in 50% of matches and average 1.0 goals by half-time versus 0.33 for Toronto II, with a half-time goal difference of +4 for the hosts compared to 0 for the visitors. Over full matches the hosts win 50% of games and score 1.75 goals on average with an xG of 1.31, while Toronto II records only 22% wins and an xG of 1.21. Additionally, Connecticut is more efficient in attack (conversion 17% vs 12%) and averages more shots (10.5 vs 9.89), and in the last five fixtures the hosts have a 60% win rate versus 20% for Toronto. For these reasons the strongest signal is the hosts taking the lead at the break and maintaining the win to full-time, hence the recommendation 1/1 (HT/FT: Home/Home).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
11Shots9
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
4Shots on target5
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
1.41xG1.38
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
2Corners3
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
60Dangerous attacks63
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
16Fouls13
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
0Cards0
Connecticut UnitedToronto II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Connecticut UnitedToronto II
1.75Goals scored / match1.47
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
1.81Goals conceded / match1.88
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
46%Average possession48%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
6.31Shots on target / match4.41
Connecticut UnitedToronto II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.19Shots per match10.18
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
6.31Shots on target4.41
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
12.3%Shot conversion14.5%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
46%Possession48%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
1.75xG for1.25
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
1.3xG against1.72
Connecticut UnitedToronto II

Shooting quality

Connecticut United: Counter-attackingToronto II: Efficient finishing
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
Accuracy (shots on target)44%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Connecticut United is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Connecticut United · 0.6 pts / match - Toronto II

Connecticut United
LWWLW
Season result split
38% W13% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-8
1.25 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.80Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Toronto II
WLLLL
Season result split
35% W18% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-8
1.24 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Connecticut United is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

1.75 goals / match - Connecticut United · 1.47 goals / match - Toronto II

Connecticut United scoring profile: very strong

Connecticut United scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Toronto II keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).

Toronto II scoring profile: very strong

Toronto II scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while Connecticut United keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).

28Goals scored (season)25
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
29Goals conceded (season)32
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
3.56Average goals in match3.35
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
13Goals scored (last 5)5
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
9Goals conceded (last 5)14
Connecticut UnitedToronto II

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal71%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
50%2 goals53%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
31%3 goals12%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
13%4 goals6%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal76%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
63%2 goals47%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
19%3 goals35%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
13%4 goals18%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

75%
Connecticut United - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 16 matches
61%
League average

Goal patterns

44%BTTS at half-time12%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
19%BTTS in both halves12%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
44%Scored in both halves29%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II

BTTS and goal count

75%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
80%BTTS - last 560%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
56%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
31%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
69%Min. 2 goals after half-time71%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time53%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Toronto II is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.31 pts / match - Connecticut United · 1.47 pts / match - Toronto II

Connecticut United - half-time state
31% leading38% draw31% trailing
Toronto II - half-time state
35% leading41% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.31Points per match (1st half)1.47
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
0.94Goals scored (1st half)0.65
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
0.81Goals conceded (1st half)0.41
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
1.75Average goals (1st half)1.06
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
44%Clean sheet before half-time71%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
31%No goal before half-time53%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.19Points per match (2nd half)0.88
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
0.81Goals scored (2nd half)0.82
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.47
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
1.81Average goals (2nd half)2.29
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
25%Clean sheet after half-time35%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II
44%No goal after half-time47%
Connecticut UnitedToronto II

Connecticut United - second-half results

31% W25% R44% P
21
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Toronto II - second-half results

18% W35% R47% P
25
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.1

Concedes 1.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Connecticut United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.80
Goals scored / match1.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match2.22.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7
Toronto II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.20
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.82.0
Average goals in match1.62.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference0-9
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Connecticut United
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
5
5
16-30
7
8
31-45
3
4
46-60
3
6
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Toronto II
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
5
3
31-45
3
7
46-60
5
5
61-75
6
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.46
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+16%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Connecticut United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Toronto II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.64
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Connecticut UnitedLigaToronto II
Average goals in match 3.563.23 3.35
Both teams scored 75%61% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 81%65% 71%
Clean sheets 13%22% 24%
Goal before half-time 81%75% 65%
Goal after half-time 94%84% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.23
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.41
Away goals / match
+29%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Connecticut UnitedGoalAlex Monis
  2. Toronto IISubstitutionOn: Dekwon BarrowOff: Stefan Kapor
  3. Toronto IIGoalDekwon Barrow
  4. Connecticut UnitedGoalMiklos Barnabas Tanyi
  5. Connecticut UnitedSubstitutionOn: Cauã Paixão SouzaOff: Miklos Barnabas Tanyi
  6. Connecticut UnitedGoalCauã Paixão Souza

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Connecticut United 1 - 0 - 1 Toronto II. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Toronto II
2 : 4
Connecticut United
Connecticut United
0 : 2
Toronto II

FAQ

What was the result of Connecticut United vs Toronto II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Connecticut United 3:2 Toronto II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Connecticut United and Toronto II?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Connecticut United won 1, Toronto II won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Connecticut United vs Toronto II?

Connecticut United score 1.75 goals per game on average and Toronto II 1.47. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Connecticut United's matches and 53% of Toronto II's.

What form are Connecticut United and Toronto II in?

Over the last 5 games Connecticut United have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Toronto II 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Connecticut United vs Toronto II?

The statistical background for Connecticut United vs Toronto II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.