DAC vs Žilina: match statistics
DAC vs Žilina: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
DAC play Žilina in Super Liga (Slovakia). The match date is 25 April 2026 at 20:30. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
DAC: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Žilina: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
DAC scores 1.72 and concedes 1.06 goals per match. Žilina scores 1.84 and concedes 1.28. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: DAC 53%, Žilina 56%. Over 2.5: DAC 63%, Žilina 63%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
DAC has higher xG: 1.86 vs 1.45. DAC: 17.6 shots per match, Žilina: 12.7.
Match halves
DAC: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.81. Žilina: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.94.
Goals by minute
DAC: 61-75 (14 goals). Žilina: 61-75 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Super Liga: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
3 H2H matches: 0-1-2. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 67%.
Match description
DAC (2nd place) has a clear advantage in chance creation at home: on average 60% possession, 20.43 shots and 6.86 shots on target per match, while Žilina (3rd place) away records 48% possession, 11.86 shots and 4.21 shots on target. This is also reflected in xG — DAC at home have 2.22 xG versus Žilina’s 1.37 xG away, although the hosts have lower conversion (9%) compared to Žilina’s 17%. The visitors are very efficient, scoring 10 goals in the last 5 matches and averaging 2.0 goals away, but on the road they concede 1.96 xG against and lose on average 1.36 goals. DAC at home concede 1.14 goals on average and have a positive home goal difference (+9), however in the last 5 matches the hosts scored 7 and conceded 9, indicating some defensive issues. Considering the hosts’ dominance in possession and higher xG combined with Žilina’s greater finishing efficiency, I predict a DAC win with probabilities: 55% home, 25% draw, 20% away.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| DAC | Žilina | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
DAC is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - DAC · 0.6 pts / match - Žilina
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Žilina is 7% better for: goals scored per match.
1.72 goals / match - DAC · 1.84 goals / match - Žilina
DAC is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.06 goals / match - DAC · 1.28 goals / match - Žilina
DAC scores in 81% of matches (26 of 32 matches), while Žilina keeps a clean sheet in 28% (9 of 32 matches).
Žilina scores in 75% of matches (24 of 32 matches), while DAC keeps a clean sheet in 38% (12 of 32 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — DAC
Over / Under — Žilina
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
DAC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Žilina - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (14 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
DAC
Žilina
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super Liga).
Teams vs league
| DAC | Liga | Žilina | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.78 | 2.82 | ▲ 3.13 |
| Both teams scored | • 53% | 53% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 63% | 57% | ▲ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 27% | • 28% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 73% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 72% | 74% | ▲ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): DAC 0 - 1 - 2 Žilina. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of DAC vs Žilina?
The Super Liga match finished DAC 3:1 Žilina. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between DAC and Žilina?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches DAC won 0, Žilina won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before DAC vs Žilina?
DAC score 1.72 goals per game on average and Žilina 1.84. The Super Liga average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 53% of DAC's matches and 56% of Žilina's.
What form are DAC and Žilina in?
Over the last 5 games DAC have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Žilina 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for DAC vs Žilina?
The statistical background for DAC vs Žilina — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.