Dayrout vs Masar: match statistics
Dayrout vs Masar: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Dayrout play Masar in Second Division (Egypt). The match date is 7 May 2026 at 15:30. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Dayrout: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Masar: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Dayrout scores 0.65 and concedes 0.97 goals per match. Masar scores 1.38 and concedes 0.85. League average: 1.95 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Dayrout 26%, Masar 38%. Over 2.5: Dayrout 24%, Masar 32%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.
xG, shots and style
Masar has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.18. Dayrout: 5.6 shots per match, Masar: 8.7.
Match halves
Dayrout: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.41. Masar: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.71.
Goals by minute
Dayrout: 76-90+ (8 goals). Masar: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 1.95 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
I back the away win ("2") because Masar holds a clear offensive advantage: 44 goals scored this season versus Dayrout’s 19, and an average of 1.75 goals away compared to Dayrout’s 0.63 at home. The visitors generate more high-quality opportunities — on average 5.46 shots on target and a 15% conversion rate away versus 3.67 on target and 6% for Dayrout — translating into superior finishing efficiency. Hosts, however, defend compactly at home: they concede only 0.44 goals per match and record a clean sheet in 63% of home games, while Masar concedes 0.69 away, which increases the likelihood of a low-scoring game or a draw. Additionally, Masar fail to score in only 6% of away matches, whereas Dayrout fail to score in 44% of their home games, so the probability that the visitors will break down the home defence is high. Considering goal difference (GD +17 away for Masar vs GD +3 for Dayrout) and slightly better xG (1.49 vs 1.44), I assess probabilities as: 60% away win, 25% draw, 15% home win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Dayrout | Masar | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.21 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Dayrout is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Dayrout · 1.4 pts / match - Masar
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Masar is 112% better for: goals scored per match.
0.65 goals / match - Dayrout · 1.38 goals / match - Masar
Masar is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.97 goals / match - Dayrout · 0.85 goals / match - Masar
Dayrout scores in 50% of matches (17 of 34 matches), while Masar keeps a clean sheet in 38% (13 of 34 matches).
Masar scores in 65% of matches (22 of 34 matches), while Dayrout keeps a clean sheet in 50% (17 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Dayrout
Over / Under — Masar
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Masar is 70% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.97 pts / match - Dayrout · 1.65 pts / match - Masar
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Dayrout - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Masar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Dayrout
Masar
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Dayrout | Liga | Masar | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.62 | 1.95 | ▲ 2.24 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 26% | 41% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 24% | 32% | • 32% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 38% | • 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 32% | 53% | ▲ 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 59% | 67% | ▲ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Dayrout 0 - 0 - 1 Masar. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Dayrout vs Masar?
The Second Division match finished Dayrout 2:0 Masar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Dayrout vs Masar?
Dayrout score 0.65 goals per game on average and Masar 1.38. The Second Division average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 26% of Dayrout's matches and 38% of Masar's.
What form are Dayrout and Masar in?
Over the last 5 games Dayrout have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Masar 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dayrout vs Masar?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.