Egypt - Second DivisionData current as of 16 October 2026

Dayrout vs Masar: match statistics

Dayrout crest
Dayrout
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Masar crest
Masar

Dayrout vs Masar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Dayrout played Masar in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 7 May 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Dayrout: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Masar: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Dayrout scores 0.59 and concedes 0.94 goals per match. Masar scores 1.38 and concedes 0.84. League average: 1.93 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Dayrout 25%, Masar 41%. Over 2.5: Dayrout 22%, Masar 31%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

xG, shots and style

Masar has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.18. Dayrout: 5.8 shots per match, Masar: 8.8.

Match halves

Dayrout: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.38. Masar: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.69.

Goals by minute

Dayrout: 76-90+ (6 goals). Masar: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 1.93 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the away win ("2") because Masar holds a clear offensive advantage: 44 goals scored this season versus Dayrout’s 19, and an average of 1.75 goals away compared to Dayrout’s 0.63 at home. The visitors generate more high-quality opportunities — on average 5.46 shots on target and a 15% conversion rate away versus 3.67 on target and 6% for Dayrout — translating into superior finishing efficiency. Hosts, however, defend compactly at home: they concede only 0.44 goals per match and record a clean sheet in 63% of home games, while Masar concedes 0.69 away, which increases the likelihood of a low-scoring game or a draw. Additionally, Masar fail to score in only 6% of away matches, whereas Dayrout fail to score in 44% of their home games, so the probability that the visitors will break down the home defence is high. Considering goal difference (GD +17 away for Masar vs GD +3 for Dayrout) and slightly better xG (1.49 vs 1.44), I assess probabilities as: 60% away win, 25% draw, 15% home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I assign a 35% probability to BTTS (Both Teams To Score - Yes) and 65% to No BTTS, therefore I recommend 'No' as the pick. Masar averages 1.75 goals per game, registers 5.46 shots on target and a 15% conversion rate, so they are the more likely side to score; Dayrout averages 1.0 goal per game, 2.86 shots on target and an 8% conversion, which limits their scoring potential. Seasonal BTTS rate is 25% for Dayrout versus 56% for Masar, while the league averages 1.93 goals per match and has a high clean sheet rate of 76%, favoring a scenario where at least one team keeps a clean sheet. In the last 5 matches Dayrout has 60% BTTS and 1.4 goals per game, but their recent xG is only 0.41 per match with 7 goals scored, indicating overperformance and less sustainability of their finishing. Considering Masar’s solid defense (0.69 goals conceded per season) and Dayrout’s low and inconsistent offensive efficiency, the 'No' scenario appears statistically stronger.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Calculations based on xG and goal averages yield expected goals of 1.25 for Dayrout and 1.20 for Masar, totaling ≈2.45 goals — computed by averaging Dayrout xG 1.18 with xG against Masar 1.31 and Masar xG 1.49 with xG against Dayrout 0.91. Masar creates and finishes more chances: on average 5.46 shots on target and a 15% conversion versus Dayrout’s 2.86 shots on target and 8% conversion; this season Masar has 44 goals for and 27 against, Dayrout 19 for and 30 against. Season metrics show a moderate probability for Over 2.5 goals (about 31% for each team), but in the last 5 matches Dayrout had 60% of games Over 2.5 and 60% BTTS, which increases outcome variance. As a result the strongest signal is Over on the 1.5 line (I estimate ~84% chance for Over 1.5), while the 2.5 line is balanced (Over ≈46% / Under ≈54%) and 3.5 is clearly Under (Over ≈14% / Under ≈86%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Masar is the clear favorite: they average 2.31 points per match versus Dayrout’s 0.94 and have won 69% of games (vs 19% for the home side), which strongly supports an away victory. The visitors led at the break in 8 matches (57%) and average 0.93 goals by half-time compared to the hosts’ 0.44; additionally their xG of 1.49 (vs 1.18 for Dayrout) and 5.46 shots on target (vs 2.86) demonstrate an early attacking advantage. In the second half Masar often dominates – they won second halves in 56% of matches and score on average 0.93 goals while conceding only 0.36, increasing the likelihood of holding and extending a lead. Dayrout frequently go into half-time drawn (draw at half-time in 56% of home matches), so an X/2 scenario is also possible, but the strongest signal from the data points to 2/2 (HT/FT: lead at the break by the away team and away win by full-time).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

35Possession (%)65
DayroutMasar
4Shots11
DayroutMasar
2Shots on target6
DayroutMasar
0xG0
DayroutMasar
-1Corners-1
DayroutMasar
0Dangerous attacks0
DayroutMasar
16Fouls8
DayroutMasar
0Cards0
DayroutMasar

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.59Goals scored / match1.38
DayroutMasar
0.94Goals conceded / match0.84
DayroutMasar
31%Average possession47%
DayroutMasar
1.84Shots on target / match3.31
DayroutMasar

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.84Shots per match8.78
DayroutMasar
1.84Shots on target3.31
DayroutMasar
10.2%Shot conversion15.7%
DayroutMasar
31%Possession47%
DayroutMasar
1.18xG for1.32
DayroutMasar
1.17xG against1.09
DayroutMasar

Shooting quality

Dayrout: BalancedMasar: Counter-attacking
DayroutMasar
Accuracy (shots on target)32%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.200.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Masar is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Dayrout · 1.4 pts / match - Masar

Dayrout
DLDDW
Season result split
22% W44% D34% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-14-11
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-8-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.91Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Masar
LWLWD
Season result split
44% W31% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-10-8
1.63 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
11-4-1
Last 5 away
3-2-0
DDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 0.89BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Masar is 134% better for: goals scored per match.

0.59 goals / match - Dayrout · 1.38 goals / match - Masar

Masar is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.94 goals / match - Dayrout · 0.84 goals / match - Masar

Dayrout scoring profile: mixed

Dayrout scores in 47% of matches (15 of 32 matches), while Masar keeps a clean sheet in 38% (12 of 32 matches).

Masar scoring profile: mixed

Masar scores in 66% of matches (21 of 32 matches), while Dayrout keeps a clean sheet in 50% (16 of 32 matches).

19Goals scored (season)44
DayroutMasar
30Goals conceded (season)27
DayroutMasar
1.53Average goals in match2.22
DayroutMasar
7Goals scored (last 5)8
DayroutMasar
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
DayroutMasar

How often they score at least...

47%1 goal66%
DayroutMasar
9%2 goals38%
DayroutMasar
3%3 goals16%
DayroutMasar
0%4 goals13%
DayroutMasar

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal63%
DayroutMasar
22%2 goals19%
DayroutMasar
9%3 goals3%
DayroutMasar
6%4 goals0%
DayroutMasar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time19%
DayroutMasar
0%BTTS in both halves6%
DayroutMasar
6%Scored in both halves31%
DayroutMasar

BTTS and goal count

13%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
DayroutMasar
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
DayroutMasar
60%BTTS - last 540%
DayroutMasar

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

34%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
DayroutMasar
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
DayroutMasar
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
DayroutMasar

2nd half

59%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
DayroutMasar
19%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
DayroutMasar
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
DayroutMasar

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Masar is 68% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.97 pts / match - Dayrout · 1.63 pts / match - Masar

Dayrout - half-time state
9% leading69% draw22% trailing
Masar - half-time state
38% leading50% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.97Points per match (1st half)1.63
DayroutMasar
0.16Goals scored (1st half)0.63
DayroutMasar
0.34Goals conceded (1st half)0.31
DayroutMasar
0.5Average goals (1st half)0.94
DayroutMasar
75%Clean sheet before half-time72%
DayroutMasar
84%No goal before half-time50%
DayroutMasar

After half-time (2nd half)

1.31Points per match (2nd half)1.28
DayroutMasar
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
DayroutMasar
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
DayroutMasar
0.91Average goals (2nd half)1.19
DayroutMasar
69%Clean sheet after half-time53%
DayroutMasar
66%No goal after half-time59%
DayroutMasar

Dayrout - second-half results

28% W47% D25% L
31
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding244%

Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Masar - second-half results

31% W34% D34% L
52
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.63
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Dayrout - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.20
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.0
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Masar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Dayrout
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
1
8
16-30
3
2
31-45
2
5
46-60
4
5
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Masar
ScoredConceded
10
6
0-15
9
0
16-30
3
5
31-45
4
2
46-60
7
4
61-75
11
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+220%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
31%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Dayrout

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.59
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
58%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

Masar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-17.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
150%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

DayroutLigaMasar
Average goals in match▼ 1.531.93▲ 2.22
Both teams scored▼ 25%41%• 41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 22%32%• 31%
Clean sheets▲ 50%38%• 38%
Goal before half-time▼ 34%53%▲ 59%
Goal after half-time▼ 59%68%▲ 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.93
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.01
Home goals / match
0.92
Away goals / match
+10%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Dayrout 0 - 0 - 1 Masar. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Dayrout vs Masar?

The Second Division match finished Dayrout 2:0 Masar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Dayrout vs Masar?

Dayrout score 0.59 goals per game on average and Masar 1.38. The Second Division average is 1.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Dayrout's matches and 41% of Masar's.

What form are Dayrout and Masar in?

Over the last 5 games Dayrout have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Masar 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dayrout vs Masar?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.