Hungary - NB INagyerdei StadionData current as of 31 August 2026

Debrecen vs MTK: match statistics

Debrecen crest
Debrecen
2 : 2half-time 1:2
MTK crest
MTK

Debrecen vs MTK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Debrecen played MTK in NB I (Hungary). The match was played on 28 August 2026. Venue: Nagyerdei Stadion. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Debrecen: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. MTK: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Debrecen scores 0.80 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. MTK scores 2.20 and concedes 1.60. League average: 3.25 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Debrecen 40%, MTK 80%. Over 2.5: Debrecen 20%, MTK 80%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

MTK has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.36. Debrecen: 11.6 shots per match, MTK: 11.4.

Match halves

Debrecen: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.60. MTK: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.40.

Goals by minute

Debrecen: 46-60 (2 goals). MTK: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NB I: 3.25 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

MTK sit 4th, while Debrecen are only ninth, with the visitors scoring 11 goals in five matches this season compared with just 4 for the hosts. The difference is also evident in their recent form: MTK have averaged 1.6 points per game over their last five fixtures, whereas Debrecen have managed only 1.0 and conceded 9 goals during that period. Away from home, the visitors average 2.0 goals, register 7 shots on target per match and convert 18% of their attempts, while Debrecen score just 0.67 goals at home with a 5% conversion rate. The hosts do create chances worth an average of 1.45 xG, but they have failed to score in one-third of their home matches, highlighting their issues in front of goal. Debrecen’s chances are kept alive by MTK’s poor away defensive record, with the visitors conceding an average of 2.0 goals and keeping no clean sheets, but the greater attacking potential points to the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS indicators point towards goals from both sides: Debrecen have seen this outcome in 67% of their matches, while MTK are at as high as 100%, compared with a league average of 56%. Neither team has yet recorded a match without scoring, and MTK average 2.00 goals scored and 2.00 conceded away from home. Debrecen have recently struggled with their finishing, scoring just 0.6 goals per match across their last five appearances, while MTK have conceded 1.6 goals per game during this period. The visitors are highly reliable offensively, averaging 2.2 goals scored, an xG of 1.54, and 7.0 shots on target per match, while Debrecen have recently conceded 1.8 goals per game. The main risk to the pick comes from the hosts’ weaker current scoring form and their 40% BTTS rate in the last five matches, but the overall profile of both teams still more clearly supports BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match profile points to goals: Debrecen score an average of 2.33 goals at home, while MTK score 2.00 and concede 2.00 goals per away game. Both teams have surpassed the 1.5-goal threshold in 100% of their matches so far, while MTK have yet to keep a clean sheet and both teams have scored in 100% of their games. The chance-quality metrics are also positive, with MTK averaging 1.61 xG against 1.27 xG conceded by Debrecen, while the hosts generate 1.51 xG compared with 1.41 xG conceded by their opponents. Debrecen’s weaker recent finishing, at just 0.6 goals per game across their last five matches, reduces confidence in the Over 2.5 goals selection but does not undermine the strong case for Over 1.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

MTK are showing clearly superior current form: over their last five matches, they have averaged 2.2 goals and won 40% of their games, while Debrecen have scored only 0.6 goals on average and won just 20% of the time. The hosts have failed to score before half-time in any of these matches, were trailing at the break in 60% of them, and conceded an average of 0.8 goals in the first half. MTK have averaged 0.8 goals before half-time in their last five matches, while across the full available sample, the visitors scored an average of 1.0 first-half goal and conceded 1.5 at this stage. After the break, MTK are particularly effective, averaging 1.4 goals and winning 80% of second halves. Therefore, the most likely scenario is for the visitors to lead at the break and maintain their advantage through full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

62Possession (%)38
DebrecenMTK
17Shots10
DebrecenMTK
8Shots on target7
DebrecenMTK
2.34xG1.5
DebrecenMTK
15Corners3
DebrecenMTK
100Dangerous attacks53
DebrecenMTK
11Fouls7
DebrecenMTK
3Cards3
DebrecenMTK

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.8Goals scored / match2.2
DebrecenMTK
1.4Goals conceded / match1.6
DebrecenMTK
53%Average possession52%
DebrecenMTK
3.8Shots on target / match6.8
DebrecenMTK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.6Shots per match11.4
DebrecenMTK
3.8Shots on target6.8
DebrecenMTK
6.9%Shot conversion19.3%
DebrecenMTK
53%Possession52%
DebrecenMTK
1.36xG for1.55
DebrecenMTK
1.16xG against1.33
DebrecenMTK

Shooting quality

Debrecen: BalancedMTK: Efficient finishing
DebrecenMTK
Accuracy (shots on target)33%60%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

MTK is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Debrecen · 1.6 pts / match - MTK

Debrecen
LLWDD
Season result split
20% W40% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 at home
1-1-1
LWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
MTK
WDLDW
Season result split
40% W40% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-0
Last 5 away
0-2-0
DD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

MTK is 175% better for: goals scored per match.

0.8 goals / match - Debrecen · 2.2 goals / match - MTK

Debrecen is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.4 goals / match - Debrecen · 1.6 goals / match - MTK

Debrecen scoring profile: strong

Debrecen scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while MTK keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

MTK scoring profile: very strong

MTK scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Debrecen keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).

4Goals scored (season)11
DebrecenMTK
7Goals conceded (season)8
DebrecenMTK
2.2Average goals in match3.8
DebrecenMTK
4Goals scored (last 5)11
DebrecenMTK
7Goals conceded (last 5)8
DebrecenMTK

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal100%
DebrecenMTK
20%2 goals80%
DebrecenMTK
0%3 goals40%
DebrecenMTK
0%4 goals0%
DebrecenMTK

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal80%
DebrecenMTK
40%2 goals40%
DebrecenMTK
20%3 goals40%
DebrecenMTK
20%4 goals0%
DebrecenMTK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time60%
DebrecenMTK
20%BTTS in both halves20%
DebrecenMTK
20%Scored in both halves60%
DebrecenMTK

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
DebrecenMTK
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
DebrecenMTK
40%BTTS - last 580%
DebrecenMTK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
DebrecenMTK
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time80%
DebrecenMTK
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
DebrecenMTK

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
DebrecenMTK
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
DebrecenMTK
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
DebrecenMTK

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

MTK is 150% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.4 pts / match - Debrecen · 1 pts / match - MTK

Debrecen - half-time state
0% leading40% draw60% trailing
MTK - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.4Points per match (1st half)1
DebrecenMTK
0.2Goals scored (1st half)0.8
DebrecenMTK
1Goals conceded (1st half)1.2
DebrecenMTK
1.2Average goals (1st half)2
DebrecenMTK
40%Clean sheet before half-time20%
DebrecenMTK
80%No goal before half-time20%
DebrecenMTK

After half-time (2nd half)

1.6Points per match (2nd half)2.6
DebrecenMTK
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)1.4
DebrecenMTK
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
DebrecenMTK
1Average goals (2nd half)1.8
DebrecenMTK
80%Clean sheet after half-time60%
DebrecenMTK
40%No goal after half-time20%
DebrecenMTK

Debrecen - second-half results

40% W40% R20% P
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.40
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.6

Defence stays stable across the full match.

MTK - second-half results

80% W20% R0% P
5
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.8

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Debrecen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.60
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-4+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
MTK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.60
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match1.20.4
Average goals in match2.01.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference-2+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Debrecen
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
0
2
31-45
2
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

MTK
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
1
3
31-45
2
0
46-60
3
0
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-11%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Debrecen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.80
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.56
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
41%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

MTK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.65
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
171%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).

Teams vs league

DebrecenLigaMTK
Average goals in match 2.203.25 3.80
Both teams scored 40%57% 80%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 20%61% 80%
Clean sheets 40%25% 20%
Goal before half-time 60%75% 100%
Goal after half-time 60%79% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.25
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.96
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MTKYellow cardKristóf Hinora
  2. MTKYellow cardMihály Kata
  3. DebrecenYellow cardCsanád Vilmos Dénes
  4. DebrecenGoalBalázs Dzsudzsák
  5. MTKSubstitutionOn: Dániel ZsóriOff: István Bognár
  6. DebrecenSubstitutionOn: Shedrach Daniel KayeOff: Ákos Szendrei
  7. MTKSubstitutionOn: Soma SzuhodovszkiOff: Mikolay Timóteus
  8. DebrecenSubstitutionOn: Leon MyrtajOff: Dávid Patai
  9. DebrecenYellow cardBalázs Dzsudzsák
  10. MTKSubstitutionOn: Ádám ZuborOff: Zalán Kerezsi
  11. DebrecenSubstitutionOn: Rotem Moshe KellerOff: Gergő Tercza
  12. MTKYellow cardÁdám Zubor

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Debrecen 1 - 1 - 1 MTK. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Debreceni VSC
2 : 2
MTK Budapest FC
MTK Budapest FC
3 : 0
Debreceni VSC
Debreceni VSC
1 : 0
MTK Budapest FC

FAQ

What was the result of Debrecen vs MTK?

The NB I match finished Debrecen 2:2 MTK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Debrecen and MTK?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Debrecen won 1, MTK won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Debrecen vs MTK?

Debrecen score 0.80 goals per game on average and MTK 2.20. The NB I average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Debrecen's matches and 80% of MTK's.

What form are Debrecen and MTK in?

Over the last 5 games Debrecen have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and MTK 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Debrecen vs MTK?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Debrecen vs MTK: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.