Slovenia - 2. SNLIgrišče Ivan GregoričData current as of 19 September 2026

Dekani vs Beltinci: match statistics

Dekani crest
Dekani
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Beltinci crest
Beltinci

Dekani vs Beltinci: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Dekani played Beltinci in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 13 September 2026. Venue: Igrišče Ivan Gregorič. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Dekani: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Beltinci: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Dekani scores 0.60 and concedes 0.60 goals per match. Beltinci scores 2.20 and concedes 1.60. League average: 2.89 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Dekani 0%, Beltinci 60%. Over 2.5: Dekani 20%, Beltinci 80%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Beltinci has higher xG: 2.08 vs 1.35. Dekani: 10.4 shots per match, Beltinci: 15.6.

Match halves

Dekani: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.20. Beltinci: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.20.

Goals by minute

Dekani: 16-30 (1 goals). Beltinci: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. SNL: 2.89 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Beltinci sit 4th and have won 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring 10 goals in that period, while Dekani have scored 4 and managed just 1 win. However, the visitors create significantly more high-quality chances away from home, averaging 2.12 xG compared with Dekani’s 1.46 at home, as well as 14.5 shots per match compared with the hosts’ 11.33. The key counterweight is Beltinci’s very poor defensive record away from home: they concede an average of 3 goals per match, have lost both away fixtures and have kept no clean sheets. Dekani concede just 0.67 goals per home match and have kept a clean sheet in 67% of their games, but they fail to score in as many as 67% of home appearances. The clash between Beltinci’s stronger overall form, Dekani’s solid defence and both teams’ problems in less favourable conditions points to a draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Beltinci have a very strong attacking case, having scored in every match this season, averaging 2.12 xG and finding the net in 60% of their last five fixtures. At the same time, Dekani have scored just 0.8 goals per match across their last five games, and the Goal/Goal scenario has not occurred once during that period. The hosts are also solid without the ball: they concede only 0.67 goals per game this season, have kept a clean sheet in 67% of their matches, and allowed just 0.6 goals per game across their last five fixtures. Beltinci's season BTTS rate is indeed 100%, but it is based on a small sample, while Dekani's stands at just 33%, compared with a league average of 41%. The most likely scenario is therefore that Beltinci score but Dekani fail to respond, making BTTS - No the preferred option.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Dekani score an average of 3.0 goals per home match and create chances worth 2.06 xG, while Beltinci concede as many as 3.0 goals away from home. The visitors have kept no clean sheets, whereas the hosts average 8.0 shots on target, compared with 4.5 for Beltinci. In matches involving both teams, the 1.5-goal line has been exceeded in 100% of games so far, while Beltinci also have 100% of their away matches finishing Over 2.5 and Over 3.5 goals. Caution is warranted due to Dekani’s recent form, as they have scored only 0.8 goals across their previous five matches, with just 20% of those games going Over 2.5 goals. Nevertheless, the combination of the hosts’ very strong attack and Beltinci’s weak defense gives the strongest edge to Over 1.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Dekani have won all of their matches at home so far, scoring an average of 3.0 goals and conceding just 0.67, while Beltinci have failed to earn a single point away from home and have allowed their opponents to score 3.0 goals per match. The home side’s advantage is particularly evident before half-time: they have led at the break in 67% of these matches, averaging 1.67 first-half goals, while Beltinci have failed to score in the opening half and have conceded an average of 1.5 goals. Dekani also create more high-quality chances on home turf, averaging 8.0 shots on target compared with their opponents’ 4.5, while their conversion rate stands at 18%, versus 7% for Beltinci. After the break, the hosts continue to look solid, scoring an average of 1.33 goals and conceding just 0.33. Beltinci’s improved recent form, with 3 wins in their last 5 matches, lowers confidence in the prediction, but their very poor away results primarily point towards a scenario in which Dekani lead at half-time and secure the final victory: 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
DekaniBeltinci
7Shots9
DekaniBeltinci
0Shots on target2
DekaniBeltinci
0.95xG1.18
DekaniBeltinci
9Corners6
DekaniBeltinci
69Dangerous attacks63
DekaniBeltinci
14Fouls13
DekaniBeltinci
0Cards0
DekaniBeltinci

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.6Goals scored / match2.2
DekaniBeltinci
0.6Goals conceded / match1.6
DekaniBeltinci
50%Average possession54%
DekaniBeltinci
3.2Shots on target / match6.6
DekaniBeltinci

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.4Shots per match15.6
DekaniBeltinci
3.2Shots on target6.6
DekaniBeltinci
5.8%Shot conversion14.1%
DekaniBeltinci
50%Possession54%
DekaniBeltinci
1.35xG for2.08
DekaniBeltinci
1.08xG against1.31
DekaniBeltinci

Shooting quality

Dekani: BalancedBeltinci: Attacking
DekaniBeltinci
Accuracy (shots on target)31%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.190.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Beltinci is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Dekani · 1.8 pts / match - Beltinci

Dekani
WLLDD
Season result split
20% W40% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 at home
1-1-1
WLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%
Beltinci
WLWLW
Season result split
60% W0% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 2.08Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Beltinci is 267% better for: goals scored per match.

0.6 goals / match - Dekani · 2.2 goals / match - Beltinci

Dekani is 167% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.6 goals / match - Dekani · 1.6 goals / match - Beltinci

Dekani scoring profile: more difficult

Dekani scores in 20% of matches (1 of 5 matches), while Beltinci keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).

Beltinci scoring profile: strong

Beltinci scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Dekani keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 matches).

3Goals scored (season)11
DekaniBeltinci
3Goals conceded (season)8
DekaniBeltinci
1.2Average goals in match3.8
DekaniBeltinci
3Goals scored (last 5)11
DekaniBeltinci
3Goals conceded (last 5)8
DekaniBeltinci

How often they score at least...

20%1 goal100%
DekaniBeltinci
20%2 goals60%
DekaniBeltinci
20%3 goals40%
DekaniBeltinci
0%4 goals20%
DekaniBeltinci

How often they concede at least...

40%1 goal60%
DekaniBeltinci
20%2 goals60%
DekaniBeltinci
0%3 goals40%
DekaniBeltinci
0%4 goals0%
DekaniBeltinci

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time20%
DekaniBeltinci
0%BTTS in both halves20%
DekaniBeltinci
20%Scored in both halves60%
DekaniBeltinci

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
DekaniBeltinci
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
DekaniBeltinci
0%BTTS - last 560%
DekaniBeltinci

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
DekaniBeltinci
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time60%
DekaniBeltinci
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time40%
DekaniBeltinci

2nd half

40%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
DekaniBeltinci
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
DekaniBeltinci
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
DekaniBeltinci

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Beltinci is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Dekani · 1.6 pts / match - Beltinci

Dekani - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing
Beltinci - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.6
DekaniBeltinci
0.4Goals scored (1st half)1
DekaniBeltinci
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
DekaniBeltinci
0.8Average goals (1st half)1.8
DekaniBeltinci
60%Clean sheet before half-time60%
DekaniBeltinci
80%No goal before half-time40%
DekaniBeltinci

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)2.4
DekaniBeltinci
0.2Goals scored (2nd half)1.2
DekaniBeltinci
0.2Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
DekaniBeltinci
0.4Average goals (2nd half)2
DekaniBeltinci
80%Clean sheet after half-time60%
DekaniBeltinci
80%No goal after half-time0%
DekaniBeltinci

Dekani - second-half results

20% W60% D20% L
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Beltinci - second-half results

80% W0% D20% L
8
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Dekani - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.80.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Beltinci - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.40
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Dekani
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Beltinci
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
30%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-40%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
20%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Dekani

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.75
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
36%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
49%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Beltinci

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.77
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
180%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

DekaniLigaBeltinci
Average goals in match 1.202.89 3.80
Both teams scored 0%44% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 20%56% 80%
Clean sheets 60%33% 40%
Goal before half-time 60%69% 80%
Goal after half-time 40%80% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.89
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.67
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+31%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Dekani 0 - 0 - 2 Beltinci. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

ND Beltinci
2 : 0
NK Jadran Dekani
NK Jadran Dekani
0 : 1
ND Beltinci

FAQ

What was the result of Dekani vs Beltinci?

The 2. SNL match finished Dekani 0:0 Beltinci. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Dekani and Beltinci?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Dekani won 0, Beltinci won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Dekani vs Beltinci?

Dekani score 0.60 goals per game on average and Beltinci 2.20. The 2. SNL average is 2.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Dekani's matches and 60% of Beltinci's.

What form are Dekani and Beltinci in?

Over the last 5 games Dekani have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Beltinci 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dekani vs Beltinci?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Dekani vs Beltinci: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.