Indonesia - Liga 2Data current as of 07 September 2026

Delta Putra Sidoarjo vs Kendal Tornado: match statistics

Delta Putra Sidoarjo vs Kendal Tornado: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Delta Putra Sidoarjo played Kendal Tornado in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The match was played on 19 April 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Delta Putra Sidoarjo: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Kendal Tornado: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Delta Putra Sidoarjo scores 1.46 and concedes 1.21 goals per match. Kendal Tornado scores 1.71 and concedes 0.64. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Delta Putra Sidoarjo 50%, Kendal Tornado 36%. Over 2.5: Delta Putra Sidoarjo 50%, Kendal Tornado 57%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Delta Putra Sidoarjo has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.37. Delta Putra Sidoarjo: 13.2 shots per match, Kendal Tornado: 8.9.

Match halves

Delta Putra Sidoarjo: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.71. Kendal Tornado: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.21.

Goals by minute

Delta Putra Sidoarjo: 76-90+ (12 goals). Kendal Tornado: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 2: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Delta Putra Sidoarjo averages 1.5 goals per home match with xG 1.94, 17.42 shots and 6.83 shots on target, while Kendal Tornado away averages 0.8 goals, xG 1.18, 9.5 shots and 4.5 shots on target. Despite Kendal’s higher conversion rate (11% vs 9%), the home side’s superiority in chance creation (17.42 vs 9.5 shots) yields significantly more scoring opportunities. In the last 5 matches Delta conceded 10 goals (2.0 per match) and recorded only one win (form 'llllw', ~0.6 points per game), whereas Kendal scored 6 and conceded 3 in that period (0.6 conceded per game), with a 2-2-1 record and 1.6 points per game. Kendal failed to score in 60% of away games but also has 40% clean sheets, indicating low-scoring outcomes; Delta at home failed to score in only 25% of matches. Considering the clear home advantage in xG (1.94 vs 1.18) and shot volume, alongside Delta’s poorer recent form, I give a moderate edge to the hosts and predict a Delta Putra Sidoarjo win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I forecast BTTS - No as more likely, estimating a 75% probability for 'no' versus 25% for 'yes', because seasonal metrics of both teams point to frequent clean sheets: the home side have 63% of matches without conceding, and the visitors 40%, while seasonal BTTS rates are 38% for the home team and only 20% for the visitors. Delta Putra scores on average 2.0 goals per match with xG 1.45 and 6.13 shots on target, indicating attacking efficiency, but simultaneously concedes only 0.38 goals on average per season, favoring 1-0 or 0-0 outcomes. Kendal Tornado have low goal production – 0.8 goals per match and xG 1.18 – and in the last 5 matches scored 6 and conceded only 3 (averaging 1.2 scored and 0.6 conceded), which confirms the visitors' defensive solidity. The home side's last 5 matches are defensively weaker (5 scored and 10 conceded, averaging 1.0 scored and 2.0 conceded), which gives some signal toward 'yes', but the seasonal profile (63% clean sheets for the home team and a league clean sheet rate of 60%) weighs in favor of 'no'. On this basis I prefer the 'no' bet with a 75% edge due to both teams' low seasonal BTTS rates and the high proportion of clean-sheet matches.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Delta Putra Sidoarjo scores an average of 2.0 goals per game (35 goals this season), while Kendal Tornado only 0.8 (20 goals), giving the hosts an offensive edge. xG comparison shows the hosts have xG 1.45 and xG against Kendal 1.13, combining to an expected ~1.29 goals for the home side; conversely Kendal xG 1.18 and xG against Delta 1.01 yield ~1.10 for the visitors, total 2.39 goals. Delta averages 6.13 shots on target versus 4.5 for the visitors and has a conversion rate of 21% vs 11%, increasing the likelihood that the hosts will realize a larger share of that potential. Despite low BTTS rates (38% and 20%), season rates over 1.5 are 75% for Delta and 40% for Kendal, and >2.5 are 63% and 40%; with an expected 2.39 goals this gives a strong signal for Over 1.5 (~69%) but a weaker signal for Over 2.5 (~43%). Therefore I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the best and most justified line for this match.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Delta Putra holds a clear seasonal advantage: averaging 2.0 goals scored per match versus Kendal Tornado’s 0.8, with home conceded goals 0.38 versus 1.00 for the visitors, and xG 1.45 versus 1.18 in favor of the hosts. The hosts lead at the break in 50% of matches, have scored 5 first-half goals versus 2 for their opponents and average 0.63 first-half goals while conceding 0.00, which supports a lead at the break. However, note the hosts’ poorer form in the last five fixtures (1 win, 4 losses) and that they were trailing at half-time in 60% of those five games, which lowers confidence in the HT forecast. Considering the hosts’ higher conversion rate (21% vs 11%), more shots on target (6.13 vs 4.50) and a season home win rate of 63% versus 20% for the visitors, the most likely scenario is 1/1 (lead at the break and full-time win), which I assess at 40%. As alternatives I assign 15% to Half-Time draw / Full-Time home win (X/1) and 10% to conceding the first half and staging a turnaround to win (2/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
4Shots12
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
1Shots on target9
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
0.72xG1.83
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
2Corners8
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
54Dangerous attacks61
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
-1Fouls-1
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
2Cards1
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
1.46Goals scored / match1.71
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
1.21Goals conceded / match0.64
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
49%Average possession50%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
5.71Shots on target / match5.14
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.17Shots per match8.93
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
5.71Shots on target5.14
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
11.1%Shot conversion19.2%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
49%Possession50%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
1.58xG for1.37
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
1.29xG against1.02
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado

Shooting quality

Delta Putra Sidoarjo: BalancedKendal Tornado: Efficient finishing
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
Accuracy (shots on target)43%58%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kendal Tornado is 167% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Delta Putra Sidoarjo · 1.6 pts / match - Kendal Tornado

Delta Putra Sidoarjo
LLLLW
Season result split
46% W13% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-3-10
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-5
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
WWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 2.01Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Kendal Tornado
DWDLW
Season result split
50% W29% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-3
1.79 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.03Opponent xG: 1.12BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kendal Tornado is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

1.46 goals / match - Delta Putra Sidoarjo · 1.71 goals / match - Kendal Tornado

Kendal Tornado is 89% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.21 goals / match - Delta Putra Sidoarjo · 0.64 goals / match - Kendal Tornado

Delta Putra Sidoarjo scoring profile: mixed

Delta Putra Sidoarjo scores in 67% of matches (16 of 24 matches), while Kendal Tornado keeps a clean sheet in 50% (7 of 14 matches).

Kendal Tornado scoring profile: strong

Kendal Tornado scores in 64% of matches (9 of 14 matches), while Delta Putra Sidoarjo keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 matches).

35Goals scored (season)24
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
29Goals conceded (season)9
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
2.67Average goals in match2.36
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
5Goals scored (last 5)6
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
10Goals conceded (last 5)3
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal64%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
42%2 goals50%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
25%3 goals36%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
13%4 goals21%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal50%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
33%2 goals7%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
8%3 goals7%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
0%4 goals0%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
Delta Putra Sidoarjo - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 24 matches
49%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time0%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
25%Scored in both halves36%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS29%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
40%BTTS - last 540%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time43%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time7%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time64%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kendal Tornado is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Delta Putra Sidoarjo · 1.86 pts / match - Kendal Tornado

Delta Putra Sidoarjo - half-time state
38% leading38% draw25% trailing
Kendal Tornado - half-time state
43% leading57% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.86
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
0.54Goals conceded (1st half)0
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
1.29Average goals (1st half)0.5
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
58%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
46%No goal before half-time57%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)1.21
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
1.38Average goals (2nd half)1.86
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado
63%No goal after half-time43%
Delta Putra SidoarjoKendal Tornado

Delta Putra Sidoarjo - second-half results

33% W25% R42% P
36
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kendal Tornado - second-half results

36% W43% R21% P
26
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Delta Putra Sidoarjo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.40
Goals scored / match1.00.0
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match2.20.8
1 goal100%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference-1-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Kendal Tornado - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.41.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Delta Putra Sidoarjo
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
4
8
16-30
9
1
31-45
3
7
46-60
2
0
61-75
12
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Kendal Tornado
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
3
0
31-45
5
3
46-60
8
0
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.51
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+59%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Delta Putra Sidoarjo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
34% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
34%

Kendal Tornado

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.72
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
151%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
40%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).

Teams vs league

Delta Putra SidoarjoLigaKendal Tornado
Average goals in match 2.672.72 2.36
Both teams scored 50%49% 36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%48% 57%
Clean sheets 21%29% 50%
Goal before half-time 75%69% 43%
Goal after half-time 75%78% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.59
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+41%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Kendal TornadoAssistAkbar Firmansyah
  2. Kendal TornadoYellow cardGufroni Al Maruf
  3. Kendal TornadoAssistAkbar Firmansyah
  4. Delta Putra SidoarjoYellow cardMuhammad Rafli
  5. Delta Putra SidoarjoYellow cardMochamad Shulton Fajar

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Delta Putra Sidoarjo 1 - 0 - 0 Kendal Tornado. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Delta Putra Sidoarjo vs Kendal Tornado?

The Liga 2 match finished Delta Putra Sidoarjo 0:2 Kendal Tornado. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Delta Putra Sidoarjo vs Kendal Tornado?

Delta Putra Sidoarjo score 1.46 goals per game on average and Kendal Tornado 1.71. The Liga 2 average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Delta Putra Sidoarjo's matches and 36% of Kendal Tornado's.

What form are Delta Putra Sidoarjo and Kendal Tornado in?

Over the last 5 games Delta Putra Sidoarjo have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Kendal Tornado 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Delta Putra Sidoarjo vs Kendal Tornado?

The statistical background for Delta Putra Sidoarjo vs Kendal Tornado — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.