Džiugas Telšiai vs Panevėžys: match statistics
Džiugas Telšiai vs Panevėžys: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Džiugas Telšiai played Panevėžys in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match was played on 30 May 2026. Venue: Telšių centrinis stadionas. Final score: 4:0.
Current form
Džiugas Telšiai: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Panevėžys: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Džiugas Telšiai scores 1.40 and concedes 1.07 goals per match. Panevėžys scores 1.00 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.57 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Džiugas Telšiai 40%, Panevėžys 57%. Over 2.5: Džiugas Telšiai 47%, Panevėžys 50%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Džiugas Telšiai has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.19. Džiugas Telšiai: 11.6 shots per match, Panevėžys: 10.1.
Match halves
Džiugas Telšiai: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 1.00. Panevėžys: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.36.
Goals by minute
Džiugas Telšiai: 76-90+ (7 goals). Panevėžys: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
A Lyga: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 40%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Džiugas Telšiai are the favorites for this match — they sit 2nd, have a 57% home win rate and have scored 21 goals this season, equating to 1.29 goals per home game. Their home defense concedes 1.14 goals per match and records 43% clean sheets, while Panevėžys concede 2.29 goals away on average and carry a -9 goal differential. The visitors have good short-term form (9 goals in their last 5 matches and 2.0 points per game; 3-1-1), but their away xG is only 1.13 versus Džiugas’s 1.32 home xG. Additionally, the hosts create more high-quality chances: 3.86 shots on target and 11.71 total shots per home match versus the visitors’ 3.57 on target and 9.57 total shots away, and a 53% vs 48% possession favors game control. Based on the advantage in average goals and defensive solidity, I tip a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 57% each, well above the league average of 47%, providing a strong initial signal in favor of BTTS - Yes. Panevėžys concedes an average of 2.29 goals per match with xG against of 1.85, while scoring 9 goals in the last 5 matches (1.8 per match), indicating potential both to score and to concede. Džiugas averages 1.0 goals scored at home and concedes 0.71 goals seasonally with 29% clean sheets, but in the last 5 matches scored 6 goals (1.2 per match) and conceded 1.0 goal — showing they can also allow goals. Additionally, the league average is 2.55 goals per match, Panevėžys has 71% of matches over 2.5 and 56% of over 2.5 matches with BTTS, so combining these signals I project the BTTS - Yes scenario as more likely (65% vs 35%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model (home xG_for 1.26 vs away xG_against 1.85; away xG_for 1.13 vs home xG_against 1.46) projects 1.56 goals for Džiugas and 1.30 for Panevėžys, totaling 2.86 expected goals. Season trends show Over 1.5 occurred in 57% of Džiugas matches and 71% of Panevėžys matches, and both teams have BTTS at 57%, which supports a strong signal for Over 1.5 (≈78% probability). Signals for Over 2.5 are mixed: Džiugas have only 29% of matches above 2.5 while Panevėžys have 71%, but the 2.86 xG total translates to roughly a 54% probability of Over 2.5. Additionally, average shots on target 4.0 (home) vs 3.57 (away) and the last 5 matches (home 1.2 goals avg, away 1.8) confirm offensive potential and increase the likelihood of at least two goals. For these reasons I recommend betting Over 1.5 as the strongest and most probable pick, with Over 2.5 as a secondary option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Džiugas led at the break in 3 of 7 matches (43%), while Panevėžys were leading in only 2 of 7 (29%), indicating a home advantage in the first half. The home side score an average of 0.57 goals by half-time and keep a clean sheet at the break in 57% of matches, whereas the visitors concede an average of 1.14 goals by half-time and have only 29% clean halves — this points to a scenario where Džiugas holds the lead at the break. Over the full match Džiugas averages 1.00 goals for and concedes 0.71, and Panevėžys average 1.00 scored and 2.29 conceded, with Panevėžys losing 71% of games; such a defensive differential (2.29 vs 0.71) favors the home victory. xG also supports Džiugas: their xG is 1.26 versus 1.13 for the visitors, and average xG against Panevėžys is 1.85 compared to 1.46 against the hosts, meaning the visitors allow more created chances. Taking all this into account, the strongest signal is the home lead at half-time and maintaining the win to full-time (1/1), so I assign the highest weight to that scenario in my forecast.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Džiugas Telšiai | Panevėžys | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Džiugas Telšiai is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Džiugas Telšiai · 1.4 pts / match - Panevėžys
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Džiugas Telšiai is 40% better for: goals scored per match.
1.4 goals / match - Džiugas Telšiai · 1 goals / match - Panevėžys
Džiugas Telšiai is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.07 goals / match - Džiugas Telšiai · 1.5 goals / match - Panevėžys
Džiugas Telšiai scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 matches).
Panevėžys scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Džiugas Telšiai keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Džiugas Telšiai
Over / Under - Panevėžys
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Panevėžys is 46% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.93 pts / match - Džiugas Telšiai · 1.36 pts / match - Panevėžys
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Džiugas Telšiai - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Panevėžys - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Džiugas Telšiai
Panevėžys
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| Džiugas Telšiai | Liga | Panevėžys | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.47 | 2.57 | • 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 47% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 47% | 53% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 47% | 32% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 70% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 75% | ▼ 64% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Džiugas Telšiai 3 - 1 - 1 Panevėžys. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 40% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Džiugas Telšiai vs Panevėžys?
The A Lyga match finished Džiugas Telšiai 4:0 Panevėžys. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Džiugas Telšiai and Panevėžys?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Džiugas Telšiai won 3, Panevėžys won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Džiugas Telšiai vs Panevėžys?
Džiugas Telšiai score 1.40 goals per game on average and Panevėžys 1.00. The A Lyga average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Džiugas Telšiai's matches and 57% of Panevėžys's.
What form are Džiugas Telšiai and Panevėžys in?
Over the last 5 games Džiugas Telšiai have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Panevėžys 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Džiugas Telšiai vs Panevėžys?
The statistical background for Džiugas Telšiai vs Panevėžys — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


