Lithuania - A LygaTelšių centrinis stadionasData current as of 06 September 2026

Džiugas Telšiai vs Panevėžys: match statistics

Džiugas Telšiai vs Panevėžys: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Džiugas Telšiai played Panevėžys in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match was played on 30 May 2026. Venue: Telšių centrinis stadionas. Final score: 4:0.

Current form

Džiugas Telšiai: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Panevėžys: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Džiugas Telšiai scores 1.40 and concedes 1.07 goals per match. Panevėžys scores 1.00 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.57 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Džiugas Telšiai 40%, Panevėžys 57%. Over 2.5: Džiugas Telšiai 47%, Panevėžys 50%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Džiugas Telšiai has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.19. Džiugas Telšiai: 11.6 shots per match, Panevėžys: 10.1.

Match halves

Džiugas Telšiai: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 1.00. Panevėžys: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.36.

Goals by minute

Džiugas Telšiai: 76-90+ (7 goals). Panevėžys: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

A Lyga: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 40%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Džiugas Telšiai are the favorites for this match — they sit 2nd, have a 57% home win rate and have scored 21 goals this season, equating to 1.29 goals per home game. Their home defense concedes 1.14 goals per match and records 43% clean sheets, while Panevėžys concede 2.29 goals away on average and carry a -9 goal differential. The visitors have good short-term form (9 goals in their last 5 matches and 2.0 points per game; 3-1-1), but their away xG is only 1.13 versus Džiugas’s 1.32 home xG. Additionally, the hosts create more high-quality chances: 3.86 shots on target and 11.71 total shots per home match versus the visitors’ 3.57 on target and 9.57 total shots away, and a 53% vs 48% possession favors game control. Based on the advantage in average goals and defensive solidity, I tip a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 57% each, well above the league average of 47%, providing a strong initial signal in favor of BTTS - Yes. Panevėžys concedes an average of 2.29 goals per match with xG against of 1.85, while scoring 9 goals in the last 5 matches (1.8 per match), indicating potential both to score and to concede. Džiugas averages 1.0 goals scored at home and concedes 0.71 goals seasonally with 29% clean sheets, but in the last 5 matches scored 6 goals (1.2 per match) and conceded 1.0 goal — showing they can also allow goals. Additionally, the league average is 2.55 goals per match, Panevėžys has 71% of matches over 2.5 and 56% of over 2.5 matches with BTTS, so combining these signals I project the BTTS - Yes scenario as more likely (65% vs 35%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model (home xG_for 1.26 vs away xG_against 1.85; away xG_for 1.13 vs home xG_against 1.46) projects 1.56 goals for Džiugas and 1.30 for Panevėžys, totaling 2.86 expected goals. Season trends show Over 1.5 occurred in 57% of Džiugas matches and 71% of Panevėžys matches, and both teams have BTTS at 57%, which supports a strong signal for Over 1.5 (≈78% probability). Signals for Over 2.5 are mixed: Džiugas have only 29% of matches above 2.5 while Panevėžys have 71%, but the 2.86 xG total translates to roughly a 54% probability of Over 2.5. Additionally, average shots on target 4.0 (home) vs 3.57 (away) and the last 5 matches (home 1.2 goals avg, away 1.8) confirm offensive potential and increase the likelihood of at least two goals. For these reasons I recommend betting Over 1.5 as the strongest and most probable pick, with Over 2.5 as a secondary option.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Džiugas led at the break in 3 of 7 matches (43%), while Panevėžys were leading in only 2 of 7 (29%), indicating a home advantage in the first half. The home side score an average of 0.57 goals by half-time and keep a clean sheet at the break in 57% of matches, whereas the visitors concede an average of 1.14 goals by half-time and have only 29% clean halves — this points to a scenario where Džiugas holds the lead at the break. Over the full match Džiugas averages 1.00 goals for and concedes 0.71, and Panevėžys average 1.00 scored and 2.29 conceded, with Panevėžys losing 71% of games; such a defensive differential (2.29 vs 0.71) favors the home victory. xG also supports Džiugas: their xG is 1.26 versus 1.13 for the visitors, and average xG against Panevėžys is 1.85 compared to 1.46 against the hosts, meaning the visitors allow more created chances. Taking all this into account, the strongest signal is the home lead at half-time and maintaining the win to full-time (1/1), so I assign the highest weight to that scenario in my forecast.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
9Shots5
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
4Shots on target1
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
1.12xG0.69
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
3Corners2
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
36Dangerous attacks41
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
13Fouls17
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
3Cards6
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
1.4Goals scored / match1
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
1.07Goals conceded / match1.5
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
51%Average possession47%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
3.6Shots on target / match3.71
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.6Shots per match10.14
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
3.6Shots on target3.71
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
12.1%Shot conversion9.9%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
51%Possession47%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
1.33xG for1.19
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
1.14xG against1.66
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys

Shooting quality

Džiugas Telšiai: BalancedPanevėžys: Balanced
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
Accuracy (shots on target)31%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Džiugas Telšiai is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Džiugas Telšiai · 1.4 pts / match - Panevėžys

Džiugas Telšiai
WDWLW
Season result split
53% W20% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-4
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-0-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Panevėžys
LWLDW
Season result split
36% W21% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-6
1.29 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-5
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Džiugas Telšiai is 40% better for: goals scored per match.

1.4 goals / match - Džiugas Telšiai · 1 goals / match - Panevėžys

Džiugas Telšiai is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.07 goals / match - Džiugas Telšiai · 1.5 goals / match - Panevėžys

Džiugas Telšiai scoring profile: very strong

Džiugas Telšiai scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 matches).

Panevėžys scoring profile: mixed

Panevėžys scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Džiugas Telšiai keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).

21Goals scored (season)14
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
16Goals conceded (season)21
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
2.47Average goals in match2.5
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
9Goals scored (last 5)6
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal71%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
40%2 goals29%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
20%3 goals0%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
0%4 goals0%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal79%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
40%2 goals29%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
13%3 goals29%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
0%4 goals14%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
Džiugas Telšiai - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.6 of 15 matches
47%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time29%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
20%BTTS in both halves7%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
27%Scored in both halves7%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
40%BTTS - last 560%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time29%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time64%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Panevėžys is 46% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.93 pts / match - Džiugas Telšiai · 1.36 pts / match - Panevėžys

Džiugas Telšiai - half-time state
7% leading73% draw20% trailing
Panevėžys - half-time state
36% leading29% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.93Points per match (1st half)1.36
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.64
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.79
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
0.93Average goals (1st half)1.43
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
53%Clean sheet before half-time43%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
67%No goal before half-time50%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys

After half-time (2nd half)

2.07Points per match (2nd half)1.07
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.36
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
1.53Average goals (2nd half)1.07
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
60%Clean sheet after half-time57%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys
27%No goal after half-time71%
Džiugas TelšiaiPanevėžys

Džiugas Telšiai - second-half results

67% W7% R27% P
14
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding757%

Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Panevėžys - second-half results

21% W43% R36% P
19
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Džiugas Telšiai - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.40
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Panevėžys - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.80
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.2
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Džiugas Telšiai
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
4
16-30
3
1
31-45
2
3
46-60
6
1
61-75
7
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Panevėžys
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
3
2
16-30
4
4
31-45
1
4
46-60
0
2
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.49
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
57%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Džiugas Telšiai

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Panevėžys

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).

Teams vs league

Džiugas TelšiaiLigaPanevėžys
Average goals in match 2.472.57 2.50
Both teams scored 40%47% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%53% 50%
Clean sheets 47%32% 21%
Goal before half-time 53%70% 79%
Goal after half-time 93%75% 64%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.57
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
1.18
Away goals / match
+17%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Džiugas TelšiaiGoalValentino VermeulenAssist: Lukas Ankudinovas
  2. Džiugas TelšiaiGoalRonald SobowaleAssist: Denis Ževžikovas
  3. PanevėžysYellow cardElivelto Ribeiro Dantas
  4. Džiugas TelšiaiYellow cardIbrahim Cisse
  5. PanevėžysYellow cardStrahinja Kerkez
  6. Džiugas TelšiaiYellow cardDenis Ževžikovas
  7. PanevėžysRed cardJustinas Januševskij
  8. Džiugas TelšiaiGoalIker Ezequiel Scotto
  9. PanevėžysSubstitutionOn: Lovro GrajfonerOff: Elivelto Ribeiro Dantas
  10. PanevėžysYellow cardKwadwo Asamoah
  11. PanevėžysSubstitutionOn: Dovydas BalsysOff: Kwadwo Asamoah
  12. Džiugas TelšiaiSubstitutionOn: Brendan Ifeanyi AsomughaOff: Ibrahim Cisse
  13. Džiugas TelšiaiGoalVilius Piliukaitis
  14. PanevėžysYellow cardJoël Fey d'Or Bopesu
  15. Džiugas TelšiaiSubstitutionOn: Tomas StelmokasOff: Denis Ževžikovas
  16. Džiugas TelšiaiYellow cardNikita Pavlovskij

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Džiugas Telšiai 3 - 1 - 1 Panevėžys. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 40% matches.

Panevėžys
0 : 1
Džiugas Telšiai
FK Džiugas Telšiai
1 : 4
FK Panevėžys
FK Panevėžys
0 : 1
FK Džiugas Telšiai
FK Džiugas Telšiai
1 : 1
FK Panevėžys
FK Panevėžys
0 : 1
FK Džiugas Telšiai

FAQ

What was the result of Džiugas Telšiai vs Panevėžys?

The A Lyga match finished Džiugas Telšiai 4:0 Panevėžys. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Džiugas Telšiai and Panevėžys?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Džiugas Telšiai won 3, Panevėžys won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Džiugas Telšiai vs Panevėžys?

Džiugas Telšiai score 1.40 goals per game on average and Panevėžys 1.00. The A Lyga average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Džiugas Telšiai's matches and 57% of Panevėžys's.

What form are Džiugas Telšiai and Panevėžys in?

Over the last 5 games Džiugas Telšiai have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Panevėžys 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Džiugas Telšiai vs Panevėžys?

The statistical background for Džiugas Telšiai vs Panevėžys — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.