Finland - YkkösliigaEkenäs CentrumplanData current as of 08 September 2026

EIF vs Haka: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

EIF vs Haka: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

EIF play Haka in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 12 September 2026. Venue: Ekenäs Centrumplan.

Current form

EIF: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Haka: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

EIF scores 1.18 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Haka scores 1.86 and concedes 1.09. League average: 2.54 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: EIF 36%, Haka 55%. Over 2.5: EIF 45%, Haka 59%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

Haka has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.44. EIF: 11.6 shots per match, Haka: 13.4.

Match halves

EIF: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.64. Haka: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 1.14.

Goals by minute

EIF: 76-90+ (8 goals). Haka: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 5.50, BTTS 100%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(3.55)
(3.50)
(1.89)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.18Goals scored / match1.86
EIFHaka
1.5Goals conceded / match1.09
EIFHaka
51%Average possession57%
EIFHaka
4.18Shots on target / match4.95
EIFHaka

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.64Shots per match13.45
EIFHaka
4.18Shots on target4.95
EIFHaka
10.2%Shot conversion13.9%
EIFHaka
51%Possession57%
EIFHaka
1.44xG for1.69
EIFHaka
1.48xG against1.19
EIFHaka

Shooting quality

EIF: BalancedHaka: Efficient finishing
EIFHaka
Accuracy (shots on target)36%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Haka is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - EIF · 1.8 pts / match - Haka

EIF
WWLLD
Season result split
36% W14% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-11
1.23 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-0-5
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Haka
WWWLL
Season result split
55% W18% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-4-6
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.98Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Haka is 58% better for: goals scored per match.

1.18 goals / match - EIF · 1.86 goals / match - Haka

Haka is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - EIF · 1.09 goals / match - Haka

EIF scoring profile: strong

EIF scores in 64% of matches (14 of 22 matches), while Haka keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).

Haka scoring profile: very strong

Haka scores in 82% of matches (18 of 22 matches), while EIF keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 matches).

26Goals scored (season)41
EIFHaka
33Goals conceded (season)24
EIFHaka
2.68Average goals in match2.95
EIFHaka
3Goals scored (last 5)8
EIFHaka
3Goals conceded (last 5)5
EIFHaka

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal82%
EIFHaka
32%2 goals59%
EIFHaka
14%3 goals27%
EIFHaka
5%4 goals14%
EIFHaka

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal68%
EIFHaka
41%2 goals36%
EIFHaka
27%3 goals5%
EIFHaka
14%4 goals0%
EIFHaka

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time18%
EIFHaka
14%BTTS in both halves5%
EIFHaka
18%Scored in both halves41%
EIFHaka

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
EIFHaka
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
EIFHaka
0%BTTS - last 540%
EIFHaka

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
EIFHaka
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
EIFHaka
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
EIFHaka

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
EIFHaka
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
EIFHaka
32%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
EIFHaka

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Haka is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.18 pts / match - EIF · 1.41 pts / match - Haka

EIF - half-time state
23% leading50% draw27% trailing
Haka - half-time state
41% leading18% draw41% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.18Points per match (1st half)1.41
EIFHaka
0.55Goals scored (1st half)0.73
EIFHaka
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
EIFHaka
1.05Average goals (1st half)1.32
EIFHaka
68%Clean sheet before half-time50%
EIFHaka
64%No goal before half-time50%
EIFHaka

After half-time (2nd half)

1.23Points per match (2nd half)1.91
EIFHaka
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)1.14
EIFHaka
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
EIFHaka
1.64Average goals (2nd half)1.64
EIFHaka
45%Clean sheet after half-time55%
EIFHaka
55%No goal after half-time27%
EIFHaka

EIF - second-half results

32% W27% R41% P
26
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding157%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Haka - second-half results

50% W41% R9% P
31
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding134%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

EIF - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.40.8
1 goal20%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Haka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

EIF
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
4
2
16-30
5
6
31-45
4
8
46-60
2
5
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Haka
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
7
3
16-30
5
3
31-45
6
1
46-60
7
4
61-75
12
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.82
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+95%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

EIF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
121%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Haka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
150%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

EIFLigaHaka
Average goals in match 2.682.54 2.95
Both teams scored 36%44% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 45%45% 59%
Clean sheets 36%32% 32%
Goal before half-time 50%64% 82%
Goal after half-time 77%72% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.54
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
1.24
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+5%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): EIF 0 - 0 - 2 Haka. Average goals 5.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

When do EIF and Haka play?

EIF face Haka on 12 September 2026 in Ykkösliiga at Ekenäs Centrumplan. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between EIF and Haka?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches EIF won 0, Haka won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before EIF vs Haka?

EIF score 1.18 goals per game on average and Haka 1.86. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 36% of EIF's matches and 55% of Haka's.

What form are EIF and Haka in?

Over the last 5 games EIF have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Haka 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for EIF vs Haka?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for EIF vs Haka: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.