EIF vs MP: match statistics
EIF vs MP: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
EIF play MP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 6 June 2026 at 15:00. Venue: Ekenäs Centrumplan. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
EIF: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. MP: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
EIF scores 1.40 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. MP scores 0.93 and concedes 1.27. League average: 2.47 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: EIF 53%, MP 47%. Over 2.5: EIF 67%, MP 40%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
EIF has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.23. EIF: 10.2 shots per match, MP: 9.9.
Match halves
EIF: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.87. MP: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.53.
Goals by minute
EIF: 76-90+ (8 goals). MP: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
EIF has a clear home advantage: they have won 80% of home matches, possess a +7 goal difference and average 2.4 goals per home game. In the last 5 matches EIF scored 12 goals and run a home sequence of lwwww, translating to 1.8 points per game over the last 5 rounds; defensively the hosts concede 1.0 goal per home match on average. MP struggle offensively away: they score only 0.8 goals on average, have a shot conversion of 7% and fail to score in 40% of away fixtures; in their last 5 matches the visitors scored 6 goals and have 1.2 PPG. xG indicates similar creation levels (EIF xG for 1.37 at home vs MP xG for 1.36 away), but the hosts convert chance quality far better (22% conversion vs 7%), giving them an edge in finishing. Considering EIF’s 0% FTS, a strong home run and MP’s poor away efficiency, I forecast an EIF win and estimate probabilities at approximately 70% for the hosts, 18% for a draw and 12% for the visitors.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| EIF | MP | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
MP is 400% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - EIF · 1 pts / match - MP
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
EIF is 51% better for: goals scored per match.
1.4 goals / match - EIF · 0.93 goals / match - MP
MP is 57% better for: goals conceded per match.
2 goals / match - EIF · 1.27 goals / match - MP
EIF scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).
MP scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while EIF keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — EIF
Over / Under — MP
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
MP is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - EIF · 1.47 pts / match - MP
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
EIF - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
MP - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -8 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
EIF
MP
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| EIF | Liga | MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.40 | 2.47 | ▼ 2.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 53% | 44% | ▲ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 44% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 31% | ▼ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | • 60% | 60% | • 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 73% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: EIF 0 - 0 - 1 MP. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of EIF vs MP?
The Ykkösliiga match finished EIF 1:0 MP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before EIF vs MP?
EIF score 1.40 goals per game on average and MP 0.93. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 53% of EIF's matches and 47% of MP's.
What form are EIF and MP in?
Over the last 5 games EIF have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and MP 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for EIF vs MP?
The statistical background for EIF vs MP — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.