EIF vs SJK Akatemia: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
EIF vs SJK Akatemia: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
EIF play SJK Akatemia in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 26 September 2026. Venue: Ekenäs Centrumplan.
Current form
EIF: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. SJK Akatemia: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
EIF scores 1.17 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. SJK Akatemia scores 0.67 and concedes 1.67. League average: 2.59 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: EIF 38%, SJK Akatemia 38%. Over 2.5: EIF 46%, SJK Akatemia 33%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
EIF has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.24. EIF: 11.5 shots per match, SJK Akatemia: 10.2.
Match halves
EIF: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.63. SJK Akatemia: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.46.
Goals by minute
EIF: 76-90+ (9 goals). SJK Akatemia: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-1. Average goals 2.60, BTTS 40%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| EIF | SJK Akatemia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
EIF is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - EIF · 0.2 pts / match - SJK Akatemia
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
EIF is 75% better for: goals scored per match.
1.17 goals / match - EIF · 0.67 goals / match - SJK Akatemia
EIF is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - EIF · 1.67 goals / match - SJK Akatemia
EIF scores in 63% of matches (15 of 24 matches), while SJK Akatemia keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 24 matches).
SJK Akatemia scores in 46% of matches (11 of 24 matches), while EIF keeps a clean sheet in 33% (8 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - EIF
Over / Under - SJK Akatemia
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
EIF is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.17 pts / match - EIF · 0.88 pts / match - SJK Akatemia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
EIF - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
SJK Akatemia - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 8%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 2.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
EIF
SJK Akatemia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| EIF | Liga | SJK Akatemia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.67 | 2.59 | ▼ 2.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 45% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 46% | 47% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 31% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 66% | ▼ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 79% | 74% | ▲ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): EIF 3 - 1 - 1 SJK Akatemia. Average goals 2.60, both teams scored in 40% matches.
FAQ
When do EIF and SJK Akatemia play?
EIF face SJK Akatemia on 26 September 2026 in Ykkösliiga at Ekenäs Centrumplan. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between EIF and SJK Akatemia?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches EIF won 3, SJK Akatemia won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before EIF vs SJK Akatemia?
EIF score 1.17 goals per game on average and SJK Akatemia 0.67. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 38% of EIF's matches and 38% of SJK Akatemia's.
What form are EIF and SJK Akatemia in?
Over the last 5 games EIF have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and SJK Akatemia 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for EIF vs SJK Akatemia?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for EIF vs SJK Akatemia: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.