Erokspor vs Amed: match statistics
Erokspor vs Amed: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Erokspor played Amed in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The match was played on 9 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Erokspor: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Amed: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Erokspor scores 2.30 and concedes 0.94 goals per match. Amed scores 2.24 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.93 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Erokspor 58%, Amed 52%. Over 2.5: Erokspor 61%, Amed 61%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Amed has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.52. Erokspor: 12.8 shots per match, Amed: 15.3.
Match halves
Erokspor: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.45. Amed: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 1.21.
Goals by minute
Erokspor: 76-90+ (22 goals). Amed: 76-90+ (18 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Lig: 2.93 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Amed is the favorite based on form — they have won 5 of their last 5 matches and scored 16 goals in that period (avg 3.2 per match), conceding only 1 goal. Erokspor over their last 5 matches have a 2-1-2 record, scored 9 goals (1.8 per match) and conceded 9 (1.8 per match), indicating defensive issues in the short term. This season the home side score on average 2.25 goals with an xG of 1.59 and concede 0.94 goals, and they also post higher possession (59%) and more shots on target (5.19) than the visitors, which reflects the quality of chances created at home. The visitors away average 2.00 goals with an xG of 1.46 and concede 1.38 goals, but their recent run is an average of 3 points per match over the last 5, whereas Erokspor have 1.4 points per match, showing a clear form advantage for Amed. Considering the guests’ 5-match winning streak and the 9 goals conceded by Erokspor in their last five games, I back an away win, although I expect an open, high-scoring match.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Data analysis favors a BTTS 'Yes' scenario. Erokspor at home averages 2.47 goals scored per match (xG 1.94) and has a season BTTS rate of 53%, with BTTS in 80% of the last 5 matches while conceding on average 1.8 goals. Amed away averages 2.00 goals (xG 1.46), scored 16 goals in the last 5 matches (3.2 per match) and conceded only 0.2 goals, producing a 5-game winning streak but a low recent BTTS rate of 20%. xG comparison shows Erokspor creates 1.94 xG versus the 1.22 xG Amed typically allows away, while Amed creates 1.46 xG versus the 1.07 xG Erokspor typically allows at home — both teams have realistic scoring potential. Considering Erokspor’s 17.82 shots (6.59 on target), Amed’s strong offensive form and the hosts’ recent defensive results, I assign a 65% probability to BTTS 'Yes' and 35% to 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals calculated from xG and seasonal averages are 1.68 for Erokspor and 1.28 for Amed, totaling 2.96 expected goals. Erokspor has xG 1.94 and scores 2.47 goals/match on average with 6.59 SOT, Amed has xG 1.46 and scores 2.00 goals/match with 4.75 SOT; opponents' xG (1.07 for home, 1.22 for away) give preliminary forecasts of 1.58/1.27 before adjustment. Seasonal indicators support the over: Over 1.5 occurred in 76% of Erokspor matches and 94% of Amed matches, Over 2.5 in 59% and 63%, and Over 3.5 only in 29% and 31% of cases, so the strongest signal is for over 1.5 goals. A Poisson model with lambda=2.96 projects roughly an 80% probability of >1.5 (about 20% under), around 57% for >2.5 and about 35% for >3.5, which aligns with seasonal shares. Additionally, Amed scored 16 goals (3.2 avg) and conceded 1 (0.2) in the last 5 matches, while Erokspor is 9-9 (1.8 avg) in that period, therefore I recommend playing the over at the 1.5 line as the strongest and most justified pick.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The favorite to be leading at half-time and to win the match is Erokspor: they led at the break in 9 matches this season (53%) and average 1.12 goals scored by half-time while conceding only 0.24, which strongly supports the hosts leading at the interval. Their xG is 1.94 versus Amed’s 1.46, and their average shots on target are 6.59 versus 4.75; combined with an average points per game of 2.65 for Erokspor versus 1.56 for Amed, this increases the likelihood of a full-time victory for the hosts. Erokspor keep a clean sheet in the first half in 76% of matches, while Amed concede an average of 0.63 goals by half-time, which limits the probability of the visitors leading at 45 minutes. One should note Amed’s current form: 5 wins in a row (last 5 matches) and they led at the break in 60% of those games, so scenarios with a draw at half-time or a later turnaround have a visible, albeit smaller, chance. As a result I rate the '1/1' HT/FT option highest, with a secondary possibility of 'X/1' and a moderate probability of a draw or a turnaround after half-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Erokspor | Amed | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.46 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Amed is 114% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Erokspor · 3 pts / match - Amed
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Erokspor is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.94 goals / match - Erokspor · 1 goals / match - Amed
Erokspor scores in 85% of matches (28 of 33 matches), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 39% (13 of 33 matches).
Amed scores in 85% of matches (28 of 33 matches), while Erokspor keeps a clean sheet in 36% (12 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Erokspor
Over / Under - Amed
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Amed is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.61 pts / match - Erokspor · 1.85 pts / match - Amed
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Erokspor - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 58%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Amed - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +7 | +8 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (22 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +15 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (18 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Erokspor
Amed
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).
Teams vs league
| Erokspor | Liga | Amed | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.24 | 2.93 | ▲ 3.24 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 58% | 49% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 61% | 55% | ▲ 61% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 29% | ▲ 39% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 72% | ▼ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 79% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Erokspor 0 - 0 - 1 Amed. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Erokspor vs Amed?
The 1. Lig match finished Erokspor 1:1 Amed. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Erokspor vs Amed?
Erokspor score 2.30 goals per game on average and Amed 2.24. The 1. Lig average is 2.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Erokspor's matches and 52% of Amed's.
What form are Erokspor and Amed in?
Over the last 5 games Erokspor have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Amed 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Erokspor vs Amed?
The statistical background for Erokspor vs Amed — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


