Ethiopia Nigd Bank vs Sheger Ketema: match statistics
Ethiopia Nigd Bank vs Sheger Ketema: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ethiopia Nigd Bank played Sheger Ketema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 15 May 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Ethiopia Nigd Bank: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Sheger Ketema: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ethiopia Nigd Bank scores 1.23 and concedes 1.19 goals per match. Sheger Ketema scores 0.93 and concedes 0.83. League average: 1.80 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ethiopia Nigd Bank 58%, Sheger Ketema 47%. Over 2.5: Ethiopia Nigd Bank 45%, Sheger Ketema 23%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 27%.
xG, shots and style
Sheger Ketema has higher xG: 1.16 vs 1.13. Ethiopia Nigd Bank: 6.3 shots per match, Sheger Ketema: 8.0.
Match halves
Ethiopia Nigd Bank: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.77. Sheger Ketema: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.57.
Goals by minute
Ethiopia Nigd Bank: 76-90+ (10 goals). Sheger Ketema: 46-60 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ethiopia Premier League: 1.80 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 27%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I expect a draw because both teams have almost identical expected xG (Ethiopia Nigd Bank 1.22 vs Sheger Ketema 1.23) and similar average goals conceded (home side 1.07 conceded at home vs 1.00 conceded by visitors away). The hosts convert better at their ground — an average of 3.14 shots on target and a 19% conversion yield 1.53 goals per game — but in the last 5 matches they scored only 3 goals and average 0.8 points per game (1W, 1D, 3L). Sheger Ketema show greater form stability: in their last 5 they have 2 wins and 3 draws, scored 5 and conceded only 2, averaging 1.8 points per game; away they also record 43% draws and only 21% of matches without scoring. Considering the visitors’ form advantage and the hosts’ superior home efficiency, a share of the points looks most likely.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have seasonal BTTS rates of 50% (Ethiopia Nigd Bank) and 43% (Sheger Ketema), averaging ~46%, but the league BTTS is lower at 41%. In the last 5 matches the home side recorded BTTS only 20% with an average of 0.6 goals scored and 1.0 conceded, while the away side had 40% BTTS with 1.0 scored and 0.4 conceded, indicating a weaker home attack and a generally more defensive away profile. Additionally, the league has a very high clean sheet rate of 79%, with individual CS at 50% (home) and 43% (away), which significantly reduces the probability of both teams scoring. xG is 1.10 for the home team versus 1.23 for the visitors, with xG against of 1.05 and 1.23 respectively; the league average goals of 1.8 and low over2.5 (25%/21%) suggest low-scoring matches, therefore the "No" (No Goal) scenario is more likely (62% vs 38%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG- and defensive-statistics-based model suggests a total expected goals around 2.31: home attack xG 1.10 versus away defense xG 1.23 yields ~1.17 goals for the home side, and away attack xG 1.23 versus home defense xG 1.05 yields ~1.14 goals for the visitors. For total lambda=2.31, a Poisson distribution translates to roughly a 67% chance of at least 2 goals (over 1.5), about 41% for at least 3 goals (over 2.5) and around 20% for 4+ goals (over 3.5). Seasonal indicators confirm a moderate goal potential: over 1.5 occurs in 50% of home matches and 64% of away matches, but over 2.5 happened in only 25% of home fixtures and 21% of away fixtures, which argues against over 2.5. Additionally, shot conversion is low (conversion 10% for homes vs 13% for aways) and the league averages 1.8 goals per game, therefore the strongest signal from the data is over 1.5 (line 1.5) with an estimated 67% probability of at least 2 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The first half is most likely to finish level: the home side were tied at the break in 81% of matches and the visitors in 64%, with average first-half goals of 0.75 for hosts and 0.57 for visitors, indicating few first-half goals. After the break the visitors hold the edge — they score an average of 0.79 goals in second halves versus 0.38 for the hosts and win second halves in 43% of cases vs 19% for the home team, so visitors more often break a lead at the break. Season-long metrics also favor Sheger Ketema: average goals 2.14 vs 1.44, xG 1.23 vs 1.10, more shots 8.79 vs 7.25 and higher conversion 13% vs 10%, which increases the visitors’ chances of winning. Form over the last five matches confirms this trend — the visitors have 40% wins in their last five compared to 20% for the hosts, and the hosts have not led at half-time in their last five matches (0%), reducing their chance of holding a lead. Consequently the most probable scenario is a half-time draw with a visitor win at full-time (X/2), to which I assigned the highest probability of 38%; alternatively I assigned X/X 22% and 2/2 14%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ethiopia Nigd Bank | Sheger Ketema | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.18 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.48 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Sheger Ketema is 125% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Ethiopia Nigd Bank · 1.8 pts / match - Sheger Ketema
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ethiopia Nigd Bank is 32% better for: goals scored per match.
1.23 goals / match - Ethiopia Nigd Bank · 0.93 goals / match - Sheger Ketema
Sheger Ketema is 43% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.19 goals / match - Ethiopia Nigd Bank · 0.83 goals / match - Sheger Ketema
Ethiopia Nigd Bank scores in 71% of matches (22 of 31 matches), while Sheger Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 47% (14 of 30 matches).
Sheger Ketema scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Ethiopia Nigd Bank keeps a clean sheet in 26% (8 of 31 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ethiopia Nigd Bank
Over / Under - Sheger Ketema
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sheger Ketema is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.1 pts / match - Ethiopia Nigd Bank · 1.23 pts / match - Sheger Ketema
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ethiopia Nigd Bank - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Sheger Ketema - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ethiopia Nigd Bank
Sheger Ketema
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Ethiopia Nigd Bank | Liga | Sheger Ketema | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.42 | 1.80 | • 1.77 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 58% | 41% | ▲ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 45% | 27% | ▼ 23% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 26% | 40% | ▲ 47% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 54% | ▼ 43% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 71% | 59% | • 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Sheger KetemaGoalBiniyam Fikru
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Ethiopia Nigd Bank 0 - 1 - 0 Sheger Ketema. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Ethiopia Nigd Bank vs Sheger Ketema?
The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Ethiopia Nigd Bank 2:1 Sheger Ketema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ethiopia Nigd Bank vs Sheger Ketema?
Ethiopia Nigd Bank score 1.23 goals per game on average and Sheger Ketema 0.93. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Ethiopia Nigd Bank's matches and 47% of Sheger Ketema's.
What form are Ethiopia Nigd Bank and Sheger Ketema in?
Over the last 5 games Ethiopia Nigd Bank have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Sheger Ketema 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ethiopia Nigd Bank vs Sheger Ketema?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


